Quoted:
Quoted: I once met a woman from Madison,WI who actually stated to a group of people that it is immoral to carry a gun for ANY reason. She stated that even in a rape situation it would be wrong to use "that kind of force" to halt the attack. She advocated carrying a condom or femdom instead. Her logic; if a woman were raped she could at least protect herself from STDs & pregnancy. When asked if a rapist would stop to put on the condom she replied;"I think if a woman made the argument to her rapist that this could protect HIM from prosecution due to a lack of seminal evidence he would go along with it" ( I am NOT making this up). Later in that evening she loudly accused me of being a "biggot" and "culturally insensitive" because I do not like the taste of cilantro and asked the waitress to have the chef prepare my plate without it.
There are some F'up people in Wisconsin!!!
|
That's it, I've lost all hope for the future.
|
Whoa...
+2But I've heard it argued that only deadly force would warrant deadly force, I think Shield24 argued that point on this board, 2 days ago? The logic he used (not his own apparently, but the points of law) was that someone charging you with intent of pulverizing you was not enough to shoot. Either, you run like hell OR... Only after getting your face bashed in and having no other choice, could you reach and draw
Therefore same person charging at you with intent to rape would equally not be enough reason to shoot. Apparently. Maybe laws are different for women, I dunno.
Me, I TOTALLY disagree, anyone charging at me for any fucking reason, (who is reasonably percieved as a threat) is a good enough reason to
stop the threat... by whatever means necessary, anything less defies all logic.
This chick you talked to sounds like she welcomes rapists and carries condoms around for their convienience
I mean, even someone anti-gun would advocate something like pepper spray or self-defense classes... this woman seems like she just spreads wide!