Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 1/30/2006 12:12:58 PM EDT
MadFat Cow Disease?


http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/contagious_obesity_identifying_the_human_adenoviruses_that_may_make_us_fat_9901

Contagious obesity? Identifying the human adenoviruses that may make us fat
Submitted by BJS on Mon, 2006-01-30 05:14.

There is a lot of good advice to help us avoid becoming obese, such as "Eat less," and "Exercise." But here's a new and surprising piece of advice based on a promising area of obesity research: "Wash your hands."

There is accumulating evidence that certain viruses may cause obesity, in essence making obesity contagious, according to Leah D. Whigham, the lead researcher in a new study, "Adipogenic potential of multiple human adenoviruses in vivo and in vitro in animals," in the January issue of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology published by the American Physiological Society.

The study, by Whigham, Barbara A. Israel and Richard L. Atkinson, of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, found that the human adenovirus Ad-37 causes obesity in chickens. This finding builds on studies that two related viruses, Ad-36 and Ad-5, also cause obesity in animals.

Moreover, Ad-36 has been associated with human obesity, leading researchers to suspect that Ad-37 also may be implicated in human obesity. Whigham said more research is needed to find out if Ad-37 causes obesity in humans. One study was inconclusive, because only a handful of people showed evidence of infection with Ad-37 � not enough people to draw any conclusions, she said. Ad-37, Ad-36 and Ad-5 are part of a family of approximately 50 viruses known as human adenoviruses.

Researchers now must:

* identify the viruses that cause human obesity
* devise a screening test to identify people who are infected
* develop a vaccine

Screening test and vaccine still a long way off

The Whigham et al. study prompted an editorial in the same issue of AJP-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology by Frank Greenway, professor in the Department of Clinical Trials, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

"If Ad-36 is responsible for a significant portion of human obesity, the logical therapeutic intervention would be to develop a vaccine to prevent future infections," Greenway wrote. "If a vaccine were to be developed, one would want to ensure that all the serotypes of human adenoviruses responsible for human obesity were covered in the vaccine."

"If one could predict the potential of an adenovirus to cause human obesity by using an in vitro assay or even by animal testing, screening of the approximately 50 human adenoviruses might be accelerated, shortening the time required for vaccine formulation," Greenway wrote. "Human antibody prevalence in obese and lean human populations appears to be the only reliable method to screen adenoviruses for their potential to cause obesity in humans at the present time," he noted.

Obesity contagion theory slow to catch on

The notion that viruses can cause obesity has been a contentious one among scientists, Whigham said. And yet, there is evidence that factors other than poor diet or lack of exercise may be at work in the obesity epidemic. "The prevalence of obesity has doubled in adults in the United States in the last 30 years and has tripled in children," the study noted. "With the exception of infectious diseases, no other chronic disease in history has spread so rapidly, and the etiological factors producing this epidemic have not been clearly identified."

"It makes people feel more comfortable to think that obesity stems from lack of control," Whigham said. "It's a big mental leap to think you can catch obesity." However, other diseases once thought to be the product of environmental factors are now known to stem from infectious agents. For example, ulcers were once thought to be the result of stress, but researchers eventually implicated bacteria, H. pylori, as a cause.

"The nearly simultaneous increase in the prevalence of obesity in most countries of the world is difficult to explain by changes in food intake and exercise alone, and suggest that adenoviruses could have contributed," the study said. "The role of adenoviruses in the worldwide epidemic of obesity is a critical question that demands additional research."

Ad-37 third virus implicated in animal obesity

The theory that viruses could play a part in obesity began a few decades ago when Nikhil Dhurandhar, now at Pennington Biomedical Research Center at LSU, noticed that chickens in India infected with the avian adenovirus SMAM-1 had significantly more fat than non-infected chickens. The discovery was intriguing because the explosion of human obesity, even in poor countries, has led to suspicions that overeating and lack of exercise weren't the only culprits in the rapidly widening human girth. Since then, Ad-36 has been found to be more prevalent in obese humans.

In the current study, Whigham et al. attempted to determine which adenoviruses (in addition to Ad-36 and Ad-5) might be associated with obesity in chickens. The animals were separated into four groups and exposed to either Ad-2, Ad-31, or Ad-37. There was also a control group that was not exposed to any of the viruses. The researchers measured food intake and tracked weight over three weeks before ending the experiment and measuring the chickens' visceral fat, total body fat, serum lipids, and viral antibodies.

Chickens inoculated with Ad-37 had much more visceral fat and body fat compared with the chickens infected with Ad-2, Ad-31 or the control group, even though they didn't eat any more. The Ad-37 group was also generally heavier compared to the other three groups, but the difference wasn't great enough to be significant by scientific standards.

The authors concluded that Ad-37 increases obesity in chickens, but Ad-2 and Ad-31 do not. "Ad-37 is the third human adenovirus to increase adiposity in animals, but not all adenoviruses produce obesity," the study concluded.

There is still much to learn about how these viruses work, Whigham said. "There are people and animals that get infected and don't get fat. We don't know why," she said. Among the possibilities: the virus hasn't been in the body long enough to produce the additional fat; or the virus creates a tendency to obesity that must be triggered by overeating, she said.

Mass screening for these viruses is impractical right now because there is no simple blood test available that would quickly identify exposure to a suspect virus, Whigham et al. said. More work is needed to develop such a test, Whigham said.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:19:09 PM EDT
[#1]
I found this article very interesting too.

It does seem illogical that as Americans keep going to more expensive & more radical extremes to reduce weight, the obesity rate continues to rise.

Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:25:00 PM EDT
[#2]
Q: Why do they call it PMS?


A: Because Mad Cow Disease was already taken.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:28:30 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
I found this article very interesting too.

It does seem illogical that as Americans keep going to more expensive & more radical extremes to reduce weight, the obesity rate continues to rise.




The ones actually trying to reduce weight aren't the ones getting fat.

I blame it on high-fructose corn syrup in sodas.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:33:53 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I found this article very interesting too.

It does seem illogical that as Americans keep going to more expensive & more radical extremes to reduce weight, the obesity rate continues to rise.




The ones actually trying to reduce weight aren't the ones getting fat.

I blame it on high-fructose corn syrup in sodas.

between that and how much we sit on our ass parked in front of computers all day
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:37:30 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I found this article very interesting too.

It does seem illogical that as Americans keep going to more expensive & more radical extremes to reduce weight, the obesity rate continues to rise.




The ones actually trying to reduce weight aren't the ones getting fat.

I blame it on high-fructose corn syrup in sodas.



I blame it on caloric intake exceeding requirements.
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 12:41:13 PM EDT
[#6]
I have to cry BS on this one due to my own personal experience.  Most of my family is overweight.  My mom, her sister and their father are the exceptions.  The men on my dad's side all balooned up at 22.  I hang out with alot of overweight people.  With this much contact time, I should be able to start contending with Rosie O'Dumbass for the largest gravitational field in the solarsystem.

I think obesity could very well be genetic.  However, the day I cant see the Major, I stop eating!!!

if u truly want to diet, its very simple.

Energy in > Energy out = Weight Gain

Energy in = Energy out = Weight is constant

Energy in < Energy out = Weight loss

I hate to say it, but it really is as simple as that.  Hell, my dad has lost a remarkable amount of weight on this kinda plan.  I have him get what he normally gets, then I take 1/3rd of that, that becomes my dinner, he gets the other 2/3rds and he loses weight.  He will continue to lose weight till his body reaches a new equilibrium when his current caloric intake is balanced with his caloric output
Link Posted: 1/30/2006 1:10:30 PM EDT
[#7]
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top