User Panel
Posted: 8/17/2005 7:54:44 PM EDT
I wonder who will be shadowing them.
August 17, 2005 San Francisco heads to yard By Christopher Munsey Times staff writer The attack submarine San Francisco, damaged during a collision with an undersea mountain earlier this year, departed Guam Aug. 17 for a surface transit across the Pacific for permanent repairs at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Washington. San Francisco will make a stop in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii during its voyage back to Washington, said Lt. Cmdr. Jeff Davis, spokesman for Commander, Submarine Force Pacific. Including the time spent in Hawaii, the transit is expected to take “a few weeks”, Davis said. San Francisco will not submerge during the transit, but will make the trip under its own power, he said. One of three attack submarines forward-deployed in Guam, San Francisco crushed its bow during a collision with an undersea mountain in the Pacific near the Caroline Islands Jan. 8. The collision fatally injured a crew member, Machinist’s Mate 2nd Class Joseph Allen Ashley. San Francisco underwent temporary repairs at a drydock in Guam at an estimated cost of $19 million, then started two months of training. The submarine completed a round of sea trials July 25-26, to prove it could safely make it back to Puget Sound under its own power. The current plan for a permanent repair at the Puget Sound shipyard calls for removing a bow section from a decommissioned Los Angeles-class submarine, removing San Francisco’s repaired bow, and fitting the replacement on, Navy officials have said. The cost estimate for the permanent repair is $79 million, said Patricia Dolan, a spokeswoman for Naval Sea Systems Command. Navy officials have said they want to send a replacement submarine to Guam to make up for San Francisco’s absence during the repair process. The name of the replacement submarine has not been announced. |
|
Google
|
|
|
You mean our guys, bad guys or both? |
|
|
USSN San Francisco
(Journalists...do they ever get anything right?) |
|
This sounds as bad as those fly by night body shops that weld the front or back half of one car onto another that had crashed.
|
|
I guess the idea is corect, but the process is a bit more complicated. This would probably be cheaper than fabricating a whole new front end and welding it on. |
|
|
I thought the N only appeared in the hull numbers? |
|
|
Just like something named the "San Francisco" to be ass-ending things in the dark.
|
|
|
||
|
I'm well aware of that I just thought it was only used in the hull numbers: USS Los Angeles (SSN-688) USS Ohio (SSBN-726) USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) |
|||
|
A 'Cut and Shut' sub!!!
NO FUCKING WAY WOULD I DIVE IN THAT FUCKER!!!!! ANdy |
|
Don't they build them by welding sections together in the first place? |
|
|
Seemed strange to me too, but apparently we've got a bunch: USS Omaha (SSN 692) USS Cincinnati (SSN 693) USS Groton (SSN 694) USS Birmingham (SSN 695) USS New York City (SSN 696) USS Indianapolis (SSN 697) USS Phoenix (SSN 702) USS Baltimore (SSN 704) USS Portsmouth (SSN 707) USS Atlanta (SSN 712) I didn't realize they came online back in '76. |
|
|
USS San Francisco (SSN 711) USS San Francisco |
|
|
I was on the new construction crew of a Trident sub, and yes, they do weld the hull segments together in rings.
I think that is a good workaround. I would be no more afraid or less afraid to dive in that sub than I was in any of the three I served on. |
|
Yes they do! But they don't crash those sections at 30 knots into a mountain first!!!! Would you buy a sports car that had been totalled in a wreck and the auto shop had cut the front off another one and welded it on? |
||
|
That's okay, I don't think your name is on the crew manifest. We have professionals that operate our submarines. |
|
|
That's how I feel about it. I'm glad there's people who like it, it's just not me. |
|
|
|
|
|
ouch, thats going to leave a mark |
||
|
Friend of mines son was on the boat when it crashed. He said it would take a year to get into a dry dock in Bremmerton and two more years to do the repairs. |
|
Let you in on a secret… I work for the Royal Navy as a civilian behind a desk now, but I have my Dolphins from back in the day. SO… as I have actually shipped out on a boat I stick to my original comment, No fucking way would I dive on that boat. ANdy |
||
|
then your a girly man and not a real submariner :p some hy-80 and a few good welders, she'll be good as new. |
|||
|
Can somebody please explain to me how a multimillion dollar state of the art Nuclear sub with every bell and whistle that can be thought of on board RUN INTO A FRIGGEN MOUNTAIN? How does that happen anyway, dont these subs have extremely advanced navigation systems on board? Somebody please clear this up for me.
|
|
They were moving fast, and had bad charts. TXL |
|
|
Still, I doubt your name will be on the manifest as we have U.S. professionals who are more than up to the task. Perhaps you'd feel more comfortable sailing on one of the boats Britain sold to Canada |
|||
|
Why? That's how they are made. A bunch of modules welded together. |
|
|
Do you think that nobody is going to bother to lay out some theodolites to make sure everything is straight before welding it up? Do you think our naval architects and shipwrights are that stupid? |
|||
|
He's British, they still all think they're better than the rest of us |
||||
|
Let me be the first. GPS does not work under water. Inertial navigation systems (even ring laser gyros IIRC) have precession errors and need to be updated at regular intervals. There are no windows or headlamps on subs. Active sonar is not used to look ahead for obstacles because it gives the boat's position away. Charts are not always 100% accurate. People (navigators and quartermasters) sometimes make mistakes in dead reckoning. Any more questions? |
|
|
|
I sailed on an Oceanographic Unit taking sounding and other measurements. We gave special attention to areas that were shallower than a certain depth. Ships of that type have been working for 40+ years, and still have not mapped all of the oceans of the world. Another problem is that area is in the "ring of fire." Remember the tsunami from last year? There are many active volcanoes under the water. New sea mountains do literally pop up where they weren't before, or weren't when they were mapped 35 years ago. We found one that had never been mapped before and it was less than 120 feet from the surface (20 fathoms). If you look at the official report that came out of the accident, there were a lot of people and process problems. One report cited that combining the Quartermaster rating with the Electronic's Rating played a part as the disciplines of the two ratings are quite different. Here's a portion of the report. Someone better at Google can probably find a link to the whole thing, www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=18257 |
||
|
If the USN has all of these sitting around......why don't they just paint one of these up......put it on-line and junk the dammaged one? Not that simple huh? |
||
|
Yeah, you forgot that undersea mountains are extremely stealthy, and that passive sonar is absolutely destroyed when moving at ahead full or ahead flank, whichever they were doing. |
||
|
Decommed subs don't just sit around, you shave your face with them every day.
|
|
I hope you are trying to be funny. |
|||
|
Of course! Doesn't the idea of a mountain being stealthy sound funny?
Damn, maybe the ten years I spent on the goddamn boats made my sense of humor bad. My wife would probably agree. |
|
No, its USS SAN FRANCISCO. N appears in the hull number, as in SSN 688 USS LOS ANGELES. |
|
|
I can't tell you who I know who was on that boat, but I can assure you he was ranked at least Lt.Commander, maybe ;) This is the internet, afterall |
|
|
So, that's the Nav, the Eng, the XO, or the CO. Which is it? |
||
|
Decommed means defueled. None of those ships are anything left but a hulk. Already stripped. Awaiting the razorblade makers. Nice pic of an EMBT blow on a 688-I. Could have been mine. |
||
|
Well, if the repair was carefully done by experts, with QC types hovering everywhere, I just might. A better analogy would be repairing a truck whose front sheet metal was damaged, but whose frame and running gear had suffered no damage. I have built subs, and the whole forward module is welded onto the pressure hull in the first place. This job, while thankfully novel, is rather straightforward compared to a re-fueling, where the pressure hull of the reactor compartment is breached. Tricky stuff, that. |
|||
|
Ever drive a car that has been reparied after a signifigant crash? They never quite drive "right" even after the reapir. Now think 1,000,000 times bigger and 750' underwater....................... |
||
|
I have no doubt that they can do it and there will be no problems.
I have flown in an aircraft that was damaged on take-off, it required the entire front section of the fuselage to be replaced. 36,000 feet at 425 KIAS. It was one of the nicest flying planes when they were done.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.