Well here is the latest liberal reply:
Big Deal? It is a big deal when these people are in control all the media assets that they own. You fail to realize that Disney releases a lot of adult orientated movies worse than F911, just under the name Miramax. (Maybe you need to do your research). There may be a lot of celebrities that are liberal, but the power of these celebrities is ridicously less than the power of the rich CEOs which own the companies and tend to be conservative.
You are damn right that suicide bombing are going to get all the news, especially when people are killed by the dozens. The news does report that, but the issue that both few people care and there is little measure by which you can measure success. The best thing so far is the soccer team which got a hell of a lot of press. When Iraq can actually have a stable election I will bet you that it will be heralded as a monument of success by the press, but for now the country is so out of control that it wont work. That isnt success. There is little measurable success, there is as much bad stuff going on as good stuff.
I have to laugh at the comment “Are you also aware that more Americans are killed every year in the United States than have been killed in the ENTIRE Iraq war?” because you fail to think far enough to realize that there have been ~1250 times less people in Iraq than there are in the US. (pop of US 250, 000, 000 divided by a fair guess that there have been 200,000 US service people in Iraq == 1250). To put that terms of the US that would be like 1.25 million people died because of the actions of the president (hey I am just following your logic, I realize it is faulty).
If there was a liberal media, why wouldn’t they be showing all the bad stuff that is going on in Afghanistan. The most I hear about it on CNN is that they voted and there is some controversy. Why don’t they talk about the fact that the majority of the country is controlled by warlords and that opium is making a big come back over the farmers. Why has the media dropped the hunt for bin Laden in the same manner as the president?
All you can bring is a few pieces of anecdotal evidence when you are trying to prove some kind of massive conspiracy. I realize my prior post was borderline, but you have a huge burden of proof here.
I could come back at you in the manner you came at me and ask, if there is a huge liberal bias, why did the press attack the Clinton as viciously as the did in the Lewinsky case?
You two feel the need of saying “Doesn't it feel good sticking it to a blind, one-sided liberal?”, yet you don’t see the falacy of this statement, because you guys are accusing me of the same crime you are commiting.
There is no liberal media, there is no conservative media. The media is just this entity bent on a profit motive. If it means exploiting a scandal that is on everyone’s minds like Iraq or Lewinsky it will do it. There is no profit in showing the good side of Iraq just as much as there is no profit in showing that there is a huge genocide happening in Sudan.
I'm not even sure where to begin with this one...