I made this argument on another forum, maybe a good 2+ minute closer for Dubya:
People whine and argue that too much emphasis is placed on 9/11. That is bullshit. Nothing has ever posed such an imminent threat to the security of our civilians AT HOME than that day. When I grew up as a kid, sometimes I would have trouble sleeping at night for fear of Mutually Assured Destruction. This was a huge but intangible threat to all of our lives, but there was nothing really to do about it. If it happened, we would just die immediately. 9/11 however showed the entire world that we were very vulnerable to attack by any small group of motivated and relatively invisible fanatics. This group used the laxity of our free society against us to propagate their attack.
This very concept was felt by every single person in America, and almost immediately everyone realized that our lifestyles would be change forever by this one act. This one act was a huge intrusion into our very freedom, because it was clear that things would have to change or we would be open to a huge influx of more such attacks - the same manner that class action suits explode, so potentially could terrorism explode into the US.
What could have been done? Completely isolate the US and its borders, making us virtual prisoners within our own borders? The other option was to strike deep against our enemy- islamofascism. It is completely naive to think that you can pin a single face or country with the bad-guy role of islamofascism- it is prevalent around the world. Rather than strike all over and violate the sovereignty of multiple 3rd world shit holes the Bush administration made a quick and decisive decision to attack the most obvious perpetrator of 9/11, and also the larger threat of Iraq.
After decimating the Taliban, we tore through Iraq and demonstrated the sheer might of a token portion of our military. We have now established bases far more capable than any carrier group right in the midst of the middle east, over some of the largest oil reserves in the world, and are establishing a new democracy in the heart of some of the most fundamental Islamic lands. This is an incredible tactical move. We not only have air and sea based capabilities in the area, but now an enormous land based force projection to deal with any potential adversaries.
So the gliberals gloat and whine that Saddam did not launch 9/11. So what? He had the motivation and capabilities to do far, far more damage than 20 monkeys with box-cutters. Unless someone has a real crystal ball, I challenge their ability to predict who will attempt the next sucker punch on our country. Beginning with the embassy in Tehran, decades of inaction by soft leaders such as Carter and Clinton have only encouraged the islamofascists to try progressively bolder worldwide attacks on our people and interests, culminating with the attacks on our soil with the first WTC attack in the 90' to 9/11.
What is clear is that whatever we were doing was NOT WORKING. John Forbes Kerry was in the Senate for 20 years during that time. There are absolutely NO initiatives on his record demonstrating any useful attempts to thwart islamofascism in that long time period. He was in the Senate during the Marine barracks attack in Beirut '83, Beirut US embassy bombings '83&'84, TWA hijacking in Athens '85, Pan Am hijacking in Karachi '86, Pan Am 103 in Lockerbie '88, WTC '93, Riyadh bombing '95, Dhahran bombing '96, African US embassy bombings '98, USS Cole '00. Kerry's record showed that he missed over 70% of the Senate Intelligence Committee meetings in his reign. He and the administrations did NOTHING back then, why does anyone believe that he will change NOW?