User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:40:08 AM EDT
[#1]
I want to believe.
Twitter link is no good. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:40:48 AM EDT
[#2]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:41:08 AM EDT
[#3]
Hope yall got some ice to cool down your credit cards!
Good luck, Cali! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:41:31 AM EDT
[#4]
Here comes the mag panic now!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:42:12 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I want to believe. Twitter link is no good. https://dl.airtable.com/.attachments/6d809a9cc6fddb883f29559e63a83234/94d604dc/DuncanvBecerraOpinion.pdf Direct link to decision. Haven't read it past summary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:42:36 AM EDT
[#6]
In on page 1...
Now do NYS! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:42:48 AM EDT
[#7]
In on one! Congrats brothers. Colorado too?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:42:58 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here comes the mag panic now! Im ok with this. May the mags flow freely to our oppressed CA brethren. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:43:26 AM EDT
[#9]
Well, y'all were just bitching that the panic hadn't impact mag prices
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:43:50 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Im ok with this. May the mags flow freely to our oppressed CA brethren. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Here comes the mag panic now! Im ok with this. May the mags flow freely to our oppressed CA brethren. The mags must flow |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:44:19 AM EDT
[#11]
 oooo yisss muh strict scrutiniess |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:44:42 AM EDT
[#12]
Awaiting announcement from PSA on shipping mags!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:44:47 AM EDT
[#13]
Is the NRA involved? I can't find a clear answer.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:45:09 AM EDT
[#14]
I have cases of magazines I haven't even cracked into yet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:45:50 AM EDT
[#15]
Awesome! Time for our cali friends to stock up on D60's and Pmags.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:46:16 AM EDT
[#16]
Hahahahahahahaha
TRUMP 2020 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:46:42 AM EDT
[#17]
Hahahaha he always does this on Fridays. It's great! Get after it Cali bros!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:46:48 AM EDT
[#18]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:47:16 AM EDT
[#19]
a step in the right direction. buy buy buy my CA brothers
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:47:50 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here comes the mag panic now! Good. Let em. In fact, we should all NOT buy magazines so that gun owners in California can buy standard capacity magazines. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:48:29 AM EDT
[#21]
Well Californians, the ammo might be gone but at least you can still find magazines. Get them while they're hot.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:48:30 AM EDT
[#22]
Horey sheet. Was this just Benitez laying the smack down again or the full 9th just said fuck yo mag bans?
Leagalize is confusing to this simple man. Also, doesn't help Va as the 4th said every ban is A OK and Roberts is still the needed vote. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:48:43 AM EDT
[#23]
...we only address California’s ban on LCMs [large capacity magazines - standard stuff basically] as it appears before us. We understand the purpose in passing this law. But even the laudable goal of reducing gun violence must comply with the Constitution. California’s near-categorical ban of LCMs infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense. It criminalizes the possession of half of all magazines in America today. It makes unlawful magazines that are commonly used in handguns by lawabiding citizens for self-defense. And it substantially burdens the core right of self-defense guaranteed to the people under the Second Amendment. It cannot stand. WOW! From the 9th? I'm stunned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:49:11 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/435747/Screenshot_20200814-114304_Drive-1545941.jpg oooo yisss muh strict scrutiniess 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:49:39 AM EDT
[#25]
sweet, now make it nationwide
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:49:51 AM EDT
[#26]
Were trump judges involved?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:50:02 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://dl.airtable.com/.attachments/6d809a9cc6fddb883f29559e63a83234/94d604dc/DuncanvBecerraOpinion.pdf Direct link to decision. Haven't read it past summary. Thanks. Strict Scrutiny FTW! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:51:11 AM EDT
[#28]
Get it Cali bros
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:51:21 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: In on one! Congrats brothers. Colorado too? Of course not. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:51:25 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here comes the mag panic now! Yup get dem D-60’s now |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:52:31 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: WOW! From the 9th? I'm stunned. Quote HistoryQuoted: ...we only address California’s ban on LCMs [large capacity magazines - standard stuff basically] as it appears before us. We understand the purpose in passing this law. But even the laudable goal of reducing gun violence must comply with the Constitution. California’s near-categorical ban of LCMs infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense. It criminalizes the possession of half of all magazines in America today. It makes unlawful magazines that are commonly used in handguns by lawabiding citizens for self-defense. And it substantially burdens the core right of self-defense guaranteed to the people under the Second Amendment. It cannot stand. WOW! From the 9th? I'm stunned. 9th has changed a bit. One of the judges on there now that Trump appointed hunts Elk with a SCAR-H. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:52:58 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is the NRA involved? I can't find a clear answer. Wayne is too busy shopping for new suits to be bothered to help us gun owners out lately. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:53:08 AM EDT
[#33]
Any chance this decision survives the inevitable en banc hearing?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:53:10 AM EDT
[#34]
Don't get too excited by Op's overly optimistic thread title which is misleading. The full 9th Circus Kangaroo Court did not rule in this case. It was only a few judges. The loser can now petition for the entire 9th Circus performers to look at the case and make their decision. That's called "en banc." Want to place bets on the majority of that Kangaroo Circus Court coming up with the same decision? It's going to lose and the only way this comes out a winner is if it goes to the Supreme Court. Until then, don't get excited by Op's Faux news which isn't the final word on this case.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:54:18 AM EDT
[#35]
Let the mags flow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:54:18 AM EDT
[#36]
In!
When do they start buying? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:54:45 AM EDT
[#37]
Awesome news.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:55:31 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't get too excited by Op's overly optimistic thread title which is misleading. The full 9th Circus Kangaroo Court did not rule in this case. It was only a few judges. The loser can now petition for the entire 9th Circus performers to look at the case and make their decision. That's called "en banc." Want to place bets on the majority of that Kangaroo Circus Court coming up with the same decision? It's going to lose and the only way this comes out a winner is if it goes to the Supreme Court. Until then, don't get excited by Op's Faux news which isn't the final word on this case. I'm pretty sure everybody's aware this might not be the final word. Why are you so beaten down that you can't be happy about a win, though? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:55:55 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here comes the mag panic now! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:55:57 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Im ok with this. May the mags flow freely to our oppressed CA brethren. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Here comes the mag panic now! Im ok with this. May the mags flow freely to our oppressed CA brethren. Yup. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:56:24 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 9th has changed a bit. One of the judges on there now that Trump appointed hunts Elk with a SCAR-H. Nice |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:57:01 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 9th has changed a bit. One of the judges on there now that Trump appointed hunts Elk with a SCAR-H. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: ...we only address California’s ban on LCMs [large capacity magazines - standard stuff basically] as it appears before us. We understand the purpose in passing this law. But even the laudable goal of reducing gun violence must comply with the Constitution. California’s near-categorical ban of LCMs infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense. It criminalizes the possession of half of all magazines in America today. It makes unlawful magazines that are commonly used in handguns by lawabiding citizens for self-defense. And it substantially burdens the core right of self-defense guaranteed to the people under the Second Amendment. It cannot stand. WOW! From the 9th? I'm stunned. 9th has changed a bit. One of the judges on there now that Trump appointed hunts Elk with a SCAR-H. President Trump only had about 3 appointments that were open to make on that crap, Kangaroo Court. That's 3 out of something like 12, so 3 wont change jack crap when the entire 12 or so member court makes final rulings in their crap court. Nothing will change until at least 51% of that court are replaced with sane, normal human beings. Until the you guys are dreaming. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:57:57 AM EDT
[#43]
In on 1
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:58:23 AM EDT
[#44]
I might have dozens of standard cap pmags that are taking up space in my closet...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:59:01 AM EDT
[#45]
Fucking awesome!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:59:44 AM EDT
[#46]
Haven't read yet but I suspect they'll die on the narrow tailoring part of strict scrutiny.
No court will find that "gun violence" issues are not a compelling interest (though lots of things kill more people) but the California law was so categorical that they cannot get there. If your compelling interest is "gun violence" then your law has to be narrowly tailored so that the restrictions are applied only to the extent necessary to address the specified interest. If "gun violence" is an issue, banning all guns or mags does address the proferred interest. But with a sledgehammer and lots of collateral damage to law abiding citizens. There's just no way categorical bans can be focused enough. But I suspect the sate will appeal to the whole circuit en bank. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 11:59:53 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: President Trump only had about 3 appointments that were open to make on that crap, Kangaroo Court. That's 3 out of something like 12, so 3 wont change jack crap when the entire 12 or so member court makes final rulings in their crap court. Nothing will change until at least 51% of that court are replaced with sane, normal human beings. Until the you guys are dreaming. 9th is majority R appointed now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 12:00:32 PM EDT
[#48]
Come on Cali brothers... Get ready to run again and have some freedom!!!
No get rid of the bullet button and those ghey stocks! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 12:01:10 PM EDT
[#49]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/14/2020 12:02:42 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: President Trump only had about 3 appointments that were open to make on that crap, Kangaroo Court. That's 3 out of something like 12, so 3 wont change jack crap when the entire 12 or so member court makes final rulings in their crap court. Nothing will change until at least 51% of that court are replaced with sane, normal human beings. Until the you guys are dreaming. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: ...we only address California’s ban on LCMs [large capacity magazines - standard stuff basically] as it appears before us. We understand the purpose in passing this law. But even the laudable goal of reducing gun violence must comply with the Constitution. California’s near-categorical ban of LCMs infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense. It criminalizes the possession of half of all magazines in America today. It makes unlawful magazines that are commonly used in handguns by lawabiding citizens for self-defense. And it substantially burdens the core right of self-defense guaranteed to the people under the Second Amendment. It cannot stand. WOW! From the 9th? I'm stunned. 9th has changed a bit. One of the judges on there now that Trump appointed hunts Elk with a SCAR-H. President Trump only had about 3 appointments that were open to make on that crap, Kangaroo Court. That's 3 out of something like 12, so 3 wont change jack crap when the entire 12 or so member court makes final rulings in their crap court. Nothing will change until at least 51% of that court are replaced with sane, normal human beings. Until the you guys are dreaming. "That's 3 out of something like 12" Okay, I think you need to stop talking about this issue. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File