User Panel
Posted: 6/22/2016 11:12:42 AM EDT
I'm busy arguing the derp with gun control freaks, and need some clarification.
Anyone have a list or a link to one that shows what states do not require a background check for a private party transfer? Thanks! |
|
What states do not infringe on the Second Amendment would be a better question. Allow. Dude you have lived in California too long.
|
|
|
everyone except California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington State and D.C
|
|
PA is long guns only.
No check required for immediate family. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
everyone except California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington State and D.C View Quote You forgot IL, its not exactly a BG check but I believe they still keep the info. Some have said that its just to check if a foid is valid since people have ran their foid thru it a bunch of times to see if it triggers something but you have to wonder why they would issue a transaction number which means they have to keep some type of record. |
|
For long guns. A purchase permit is required for concealable firearms. |
|
View Quote |
|
Thie liberal looney bin where I live still allows FTF sales with no check.
|
|
I don't think OP knows what private means.
Oh and only take cash |
|
|
I've heard, that in Oregon, people are pretty much doing it anyway.
|
|
Pennsylvania does for anything that is not a "firearm".
A "firearm" is defined as: "Any pistol or revolver with a barrel length less than 15 inches, any shotgun with a barrel length less than 18 inches or any rifle with a barrel length less than 16 inches, or any pistol, revolver, rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than 26 inches. The barrel length of a firearm shall be determined by measuring from the muzzle of the barrel to the face of the closed action, bolt or cylinder, whichever is applicable." |
|
|
Indiana checking in. No bg check for ftf sales, no mag bans, nfa friendly, lifetime carry permit and can carry a firearm in your car on school property.
|
|
mass allows 4 ftf a year but it has to be registered (the transfer not the gun lol ) via E-fa10 and both parties have to be permit holders. we do get nic'ed to get the permits. (FID or LTC for pistol or high cap)
|
|
I had no idea how bad every other state sucked as far as guns go
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, a person holding a valid FFL is not a "private party", if that firearm is on their books. It is worth noting.
|
|
Quoted:
You have a point. But that wasn't the question. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What states do not infringe on the Second Amendment would be a better question. Allow. Dude you have lived in California too long. Make it the question. Using language that is not defeatist or represents servantude is important in these arguments. Be careful how you choose your words. |
|
Quoted:
Really? I thought you needed a permit to buy a handgun? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We do what we want in Missouri. Really? I thought you needed a permit to buy a handgun? I think at one time STL had a city ordinance or some shit that required it. |
|
Quoted:
I think at one time STL had a city ordinance or some shit that required it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We do what we want in Missouri. Really? I thought you needed a permit to buy a handgun? I think at one time STL had a city ordinance or some shit that required it. Sound right, maybe county, I have family there and vaguely remember when a cousin got his permit, I was like what "permit" |
|
Quoted:
I'm busy arguing the derp with gun control freaks, and need some clarification. Anyone have a list or a link to one that shows what states do not require a background check for a private party transfer? Thanks! View Quote The second amendment says no state requires any form of check. It mentions that specifically in the "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" section. |
|
View Quote That site seems weird. They also apparently are unaware that Louisiana is a state. |
|
Quoted: The second amendment says no state requires any form of check. It mentions that specifically in the "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" section. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'm busy arguing the derp with gun control freaks, and need some clarification. Anyone have a list or a link to one that shows what states do not require a background check for a private party transfer? Thanks! The second amendment says no state requires any form of check. It mentions that specifically in the "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" section. |
|
Illinois technically does not require a BG check. You just have to go online to make sure their foid card is valid. But to get a foid card their background check you, so BG checks on guns in IL are redundant.
|
|
Michigan allows private party sales of long guns, nothing is required.
The buyer does have to go get a pistol purchase permit for a handgun. |
|
Florida does. But personally, I only sell FTF to people who possess a CWL, and I write up a bill of sale.
|
|
WA gained "universal background checks" back in 2013 with a retarded initiative that all the democrats voted for. (it would never have made it through normal legislative channels) It was challenged in court and the case was thrown out because nobody has standing: because they've NEVER prosecuted anyone over it. Even when people do a transfer right in front of the police, and say that is what they're doing. Then they claim it is a 1st amendment political statement and thus won't prosecute! WTF. This topic makes me so mad. On the upside we have gotten silencers and SBRs legal again in recent years. MGs and SBSs aren't likely though.
So we have them, but it isn't enforced (without a sting operation it is impossible to enforce as there are no records about who owns what firearm when). Immediate family is exempted, and I don't know the legal framework around family definitions. Aren't we all brothers and sisters of humanity? F-em, I never sell anything anyway. FFLs all charge a transfer fee to perform the service, $25-50, up to them what they charge. |
|
|
Virginia allows private party transfers without the Commonwealth's interference.
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah we already knew Ma. sucked for gun rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
mass allows 4 ftf a year but it has to be registered (the transfer not the gun lol ) via E-fa10 and both parties have to be permit holders. we do get nic'ed to get the permits. (FID or LTC for pistol or high cap) Yeah we already knew Ma. sucked for gun rights. But not nearly as bad as some states. We did shoot down a SAFE Act style law shortly after NY passed theirs. Our laws do suck compared to most though. |
|
No restrictions here on private party transactions of long guns or hand guns.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.