User Panel
Posted: 3/5/2015 1:34:24 PM EDT
The religion of peace is nearing a deal with Obama... what could possibly go wrong?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/05/iran-renews-vow-to-annihilate-israel-nbc-buries-lede/ |
|
Israel should give them jobs, that is a surefire way to get rid of Islamic violence, er I mean Christian intolerance.
|
|
Iran's been going around telling everybody that they're going to kick Israel's ass after school. Israel should catch up to them during recess and get it over with.
|
|
I am glad Obummer is working on that treaty, that will remain secret from the American people.
|
|
Well with iran cutting across iraq to "attack isis" they are one step closer to Israel, what if they are meeting up with isis to join forces?
|
|
|
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’.
That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. |
|
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. View Quote Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. |
|
Quoted: If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. Quite delusional |
|
Quoted: Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. View Quote Yeah, the Iranians have pinky promised to use their nuclear bombs to annihilate only the Netanyahu regime and no other Jews. |
|
I feel the "its happening" gif may be realistically appropriate in the near future. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. |
|
Quoted:
There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. If the Jews would just shut the fuck up and die already, we would have peace in our time.... |
|
|
Quoted: There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? |
|
|
Quoted: They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. |
|
Quoted:
Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Iran will fight back. |
|
Quoted:
If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. LOL, you're the delusional one who can not differentiate rhetoric from reality. Iran may be a lot of things, but they are not suicidal. Israel knows this but loves to play this angle for obvious foreign policy reasons and interests. |
|
Quoted:
The religion of peace is nearing a deal with Obama... what could possibly go wrong? http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/05/iran-renews-vow-to-annihilate-israel-nbc-buries-lede/ View Quote And we can thank the president and the SOS (lurch) for this situation. |
|
Quoted: Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. I have a feeling that Iran's facilities won't be that easy to reach and that Israel lacks the capabilities to strike them effectively without resorting to nukes. Interesting times... |
|
Quoted:
I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? Well, you've got GD's "glass parking lot" brigade for starters. |
|
|
|
Y'all realize that if either country nukes the other...it's very likely the beginning of the end? Everybody will pick sides and WW III will be underway? In that vein...who do you think would ally with the US against the rest of the world? I have to imagine that Russia, China, NORKland, Pakistan, all the muslim countries, etc. won't be shoving each other out of the way to get in line to help the USA. The rest will be looking for the least destructive outcome for their countries. Obummer has alienated the world. The possibilities are nearly too horrible to contemplate. Be careful what you wish for....you might just get it. |
|
|
My wife expressed some interest in us renewing our vows.
I am going to put annihilate Israel on the list and see what she thinks. |
|
|
|
I would be kinda hard to nuke Isreal off the map when their crap temple is to the right of it.
|
|
Frank Underwood would almost be a better option than our current POTUS right now.
|
|
Quoted:
If Iran wants a nuke, lets give them a couple. We can even deliver. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/B-1B_B-2_and_B-52.jpg View Quote That BUFF is raked |
|
|
Why is this our problem? Let Israel do whatever they want, and then deal with the consequences themselves.
|
|
I get the feeling the only thing holding Israel back is a lack of backup from us
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Iran will fight back. If Israel believes that the mullahs represent an existential threat, that will be something they are willing to accept. |
|
|
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. View Quote In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. |
|
Quoted:
If Iran wants a nuke, lets give them a couple. We can even deliver. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/B-1B_B-2_and_B-52.jpg View Quote I dunno, Iran has been improving their air defenses for decades....they could get lucky. I say we use the ultimate in "**** your defenses".... |
|
Quoted:
The Syrians and Iraqis could have fought back, too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Iran will fight back. The Syrians and Iraqis could have fought back, too. What was interesting with Iraq, is the total Non-Commital actions of the Soldiers. More is going on in terms of social influence than people realize. Now Syria was a bit different, but impactually equivelant. |
|
It is about time the Jews got off of their high horse and stopped believing that violence is constrained to one race. Remember when the Maccabees committed horrible deeds in the name of God, to rebuild Judea? Yeah, samesies with Iran now. Therefore, we should turn a blind eye... Oh, and racism.... something about racism.... probably that YOU are a RACIST unless you agree with me!
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.