User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/30/2002 6:00:50 PM EDT
[#1]
Apparently, what we really need is a Constitutional amendment that protects our Constitutional Amendments...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2002 6:45:24 PM EDT
[#2]
American Family Association, now there is a winning organization. Please.
In buddha we trust. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2002 7:33:23 PM EDT
[#3]
Why are conservatives fighting to defend school prayer and the religious content of political slogans? These things are in direct opposition of scripture:
[b]And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. (Matthew 6:5-6)[/b] -Mike... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2002 7:56:33 PM EDT
[#4]
While they're at it, they ought to make an amendment that the Constitution means what it says.....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2002 11:37:45 AM EDT
[#5]
The right to be free from forced oaths was one of the main reasons that the first Euroupeans came to North America. Let's not go backwards. Both of these items were nothing more than a political response to "Godless Communism" in the 50s. If you want to pray and salute the flag, go ahead. I won't be joining you and no bully is going to make my kid do it either.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2002 3:29:51 PM EDT
[#6]
Not needed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2002 6:08:31 PM EDT
[#7]
NO!!!
Amendements should be carefully reasoned responses to serious issues regarding the preservation of liberty, not feel-good responses to minor issues. Doing so totally dilutes the seriousness of the process. All we need here is for the constitution itself to be treated as a relevent document again, and we wouldn't have problems such as the one this misguided proposal seeks to address, a runaway activist judiciary that has totally overstepped it's defined bounds. -Eric |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2002 8:01:03 PM EDT
[#8]
What we really need is an Amendment requiring elected officials to have served in the military. I believe that would have saved us from the previous administration, among other benefits.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2002 8:22:53 PM EDT
[#9]
DONE...allthough it was about a month ago!!
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
