Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 12/12/2002 9:17:01 PM EDT
I was on DU debating back and forth with DU anti gunners and some of them think the police are covered under a militia only view of the Second because they are a government entity.

Thoughts?

CRC
Link Posted: 12/12/2002 9:36:13 PM EDT
[#1]
The reason police can be armed is because they are citizens.

They are not a standing army or armed accordingly.

-934
Link Posted: 12/12/2002 9:39:00 PM EDT
[#2]
Next thing you know, the freedom of speech will be limited only to politicians and the gov.  

Anyone ask, WHY the government would need to write into the constitution that it has the right to bear arms??!!!  Dumb fucking liberal sacks of moose poop.  The right to bear arms is only second to the right to freedom of speech.  Maybe one day people will get that.
Link Posted: 12/12/2002 9:55:48 PM EDT
[#3]
I belive the D u 's genuinely belive that since it places the reponseibitly for thier safty on someone else... and thats all they want...
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top