The comments attached to the article are really harsh. I've studied and worked here at the UW since '93 and my experience is quite different. Yes, this campus is hugely liberal, and the city too, but there is balance. I would in fact be so bold as to say there are as many conservatives as there are liberals among the academicians I've worked with and gotten to know here. There's a remaining portion who are just nuts and I can't figure out their political slant.
Even the students here aren't sheep. They're genuinely interested in learning about things that they've judged ill, and often can be converted if you put forward good arguments.
ROTC students are treated well here, well enough at least... everyone on this campus should get expect to get ragged on a little for various reasons, and ROTC students don't deserve any different.
Then there is this:
This is the core. Their attitude seems to be: I have no real abilities, apart from B*** S***. In the real world, I'd probably be a file clerk. But I'm actually than everyone else, so making me a menial worker would just be so wrong. That means the world is unfair to deserving people like myself. So competition is bad. Any system that would refuse to pay me a lot of money for my non-existent skills is bad. So I'll just sit here in my ivory tower, raking in a comfortable income and I'll do anything I can to destroy the whole system that would recognize me as a parasite, if I gave it a chance (which I won't).
View Quote
Geez! Tell me if I'm right, this guy is saying that academicians have the skills of a menial worker, but still manage to get $100+k jobs, and devise this grand scheme to indoctrinate students with a system that will allow low-skilled people to flourish.
I was once a file clerk, and I can say wholeheartedly that the professors I filed stuff for were far more qualified and able than me in so many ways.
Maybe the guy who wrote that didn't go to college, but I think most of us who have spent 4yrs in college know that the 10-15yrs of studies academicians have done don't amount to just menial skills!
Of course I can't deny that there are some shitty people out there (like there is in every field) but largely the people who teach your children are well meaning, well educated, and are respected by their students.
I work in the Economics department, and there is a grand total of one open socialist among the faculty! There's a group of men here who regularly have a few beers on friday afternoons, and when I joined them once we made a toast to capitalism. There is also only one guy here who is strongly opposed to globalism. So no, this place is not filled with left wing extremists.
One last thing in my rant. Do people know how academicians performance is judged? Research, that's all. Not how they teach. Not by their conservative or liberal values (as someone suggested!). But by what they've created and what got published. What gets published determines who rises to the top and who merely remain tutors.
I would suggest looking up a particular academicians website to see their journal articles. Run through them and decide for yourself whether these people are stupid and inferior, or whether they just happen to have a different opinion than yours. For every Noam Chomsky on a university campus, there is a David Horowitz to duke it out. And you can't try to silence the Chomskys without silencing the Horowitzs.
Ok rant over.