User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 1:49:51 PM EDT
[#1]
The ultimate paradox is that she is fired for the very same thing that liberal column writers and TV commentators do every damn day.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 1:51:24 PM EDT
[#2]
From the article -
Your Friday column, in which you declared that liberals are "no good," then trashed the entire Kennedy clan as a collection of "heroin addicts, convicted killers, cheaters, bottleggers and dissolute drunks," crossed that line. I'm not going to defend the Kennedy family or liberals; either group can argue with you if they'd like. But, Ann, you're mean -- vicious, really -- which is why we do not believe that you in any way serve the public good. The fact that everything she has said is TRUE is of no relevance to this editor. Just that it paints the Kennedy's in a negative light is what makes it wrong. On a late summer morning almost a year ago, all of us -- Republicans, Democrats and everyone else -- witnessed what hate is capable of. Since that day, Americans have tried to remember that they are on the same side, regardless of differences in skin color, nation of origin, religion or political viewpoint. It has not always been easy because, more than ever, those who are different can seem more threatening. But we're trying because what we have in America is worth keeping. This tactic is familiar, and has been used against me. When you can't argue the facts, pour some emotional accelerant on the discussion and make a huge conflagration, such that, if anyone dare agree with Ms. Coulter, well, they MUST be anti_american pro terrorist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 1:59:31 PM EDT
[#3]
I just emailed Mr Unger.
I said everything in that article of hers is backed by fact. I then told him he was fired. I feel alot better now. mug |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:00:21 PM EDT
[#4]
If that's a real letter, then boy has she got a lawsuit in the works!
Equating her with the attacks of 9/11! Can you spell S-L-A-N-D-E-R boys and girls? Woo-hoo! This is going to be fun! And everyone above is right on the money, BTW... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:09:00 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: Ann Coulter Gets Fired ......Again Hopefully she is preparing to enter the US Senate. She would really liven that bunch up. No need for a speech writer. The phrase "wax eloquent" comes to mind. She is a babe. (I wonder if that offends her. If it does offend her, she is not a babe. I know she is married. But is she happily married?) |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:14:14 PM EDT
[#6]
Hehehe... I'll create a position for Ann! [sex] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:30:30 PM EDT
[#7]
Folks, we're only talking about the Centre Daily Times!
Not some real newspaper, but a mere pipsqueak of a paper, that's only in the news at all just because of this firing! Yes, Ann Coulter is probably rolling in the dough, but so what? And, BTW, [b]anti-USSA[/b], you can only have her when I'm finished with her... Eric The(InAYearOrSo!)Hun[>]:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:35:23 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted: And, BTW, [b]anti-USSA[/b], you can only have her when I'm finished with her... Eric The(InAYearOrSo!)Hun[>]:)] OK anti([red]once I get past the used part, it'll still be good[/red])USSA [sex] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 2:44:58 PM EDT
[#9]
She's not really "fired". She still has a job (or contractual relationship) with her syndication firm, etc. Like the FunGunHun said, this just means that the Podunk Daily Blather (or whatever) doesn't carry her column anymore. Hundreds of other newspapers still do carry her.
Newspapers take up and drop columns for a variety of reasons - less ad space leads to less editorial space, space filler issues, price, etc. Maybe they can save money by filling column-inches with text from a cheap local columnist who also does double-duty as a reporter/writer for no extra pay but thinks he has a bit more prestige being an Op-Ed columnist in said Podunk region). I'm sure Seniorita Coulter and her syndicators didn't flinch a bit. "Centre Daily whooo???" Her syndicators may not have even told her yet: every month there's probably an add and drop report mailed to her with her check. Bill Wiese San Mateo, CA |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 3:36:08 PM EDT
[#10]
Ann! You rock! We love you!
Here's a weak hater column by someone who knew Ann from law school, and is now apparantly envious of Ann's success [b]It's Ann herself we loathe[/b] September 3, 2002 In the late 1980s I was a student at the University of Michigan Law School. One dismal winter day, as I emerged from the fog of an early morning lecture, I encountered a remarkable document in the pages of the school newspaper. A fellow student had written a letter attacking the school's administration for taking a politically incorrect position on some matter. Although I can't remember the precise nature of the controversy, I do remember some of the phrases the student used in the course of excoriating the administration, and specifically the law school's dean, Lee Bollinger (now president of Columbia University). As I recall, the author referred to "our beach boy dean," and implied that Bollinger was more interested in honing his tennis game and working up a tan than in defending our sacred constitutional liberties. The letter continued in this vein for several paragraphs. The letter read like the sort of thing a person might write in the middle of the night under the influence of a martini or three, and I felt a pang of pity for its author, who in the cold light of morning must surely have been mortified to discover that she had allowed herself to indulge in such an over-the-top outburst of comical insolence. Yes, I remember thinking, even someone like Ann Coulter - for that was the name of the letter's author - shouldn't have to live with the embarrassment of having authored such a text. Coulter graduated from her position as the most loathed person in her law school class and went on to become a ubiquitous media celebrity. After a brief legal career, she gave herself over to the lucrative pleasures of hatred: she is currently the author of America's best-selling non-fiction book, a polemic entitled Slander, that attacks "liberals" in the most histrionic terms imaginable for making intemperate statements about people with whose views they disagree. Considered as a sincere attempt to analyze ideological bias in the media, Slander is something worse than worthless; nevertheless, as a sociological matter, both its success and that of its author tell us something about America today. At one level, people pay attention to Coulter because she is tall and blonde and extremely thin. There's little doubt that, without the cultural cachet provided by these characteristics, Coulter would be just another anonymous ideologue, churning out widely ignored diatribes. Yet because Coulter's physical appearance reflects certain media clichés of what an attractive woman is supposed to look like, she has come to be treated as a public intellectual, although her ideas are no more original or interesting than those of the most orthodox political hack. This, to put it mildly, is somewhat ironic. Coulter blasts the media for giving airtime to the political views of "worthless silicone nothings" such as actors Heather Graham and Lara Flynn Boyle, yet the only significant difference between her fame and that of people like Graham and Boyle is the precise nature of the cosmetic interventions involved in each case. Coulter's career provides a particularly stark instance of a feature found among the most annoying ideologues across the political spectrum. Coulter attributes the visceral reactions she elicits to "liberal intolerance," when those reactions have always been a product of the fact that she herself is intolerable. She is merely the latest example of someone who has managed to transform the predictable response to her own egregious behavior into a theory about the nature of the world. In short, it's not your politics that "we" can't stand, Ann: it's you. Paul Campos is a professor of law at the University of Colorado. He can be reached at [email protected]. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 3:44:25 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted: Quoted: And, BTW, [b]anti-USSA[/b], you can only have her when I'm finished with her... Eric The(InAYearOrSo!)Hun[>]:)] OK anti([red]once I get past the used part, it'll still be good[/red])USSA [sex] I got dibs on 3rd! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 3:44:40 PM EDT
[#12]
Post from antiUSSA -
once I get past the used part, it'll still be good Son, from what I've heard tell, you'll never get past the used part! [:D] Eric The([:D])Hun[>]:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 3:45:38 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted: Ann! You rock! We love you! Here's a weak hater column by someone who knew Ann from law school, and is now apparantly envious of Ann's success [b]It's Ann herself we loathe[/b] September 3, 2002 In the late 1980s I was a student at the University of Michigan Law School. One dismal winter day, [red]as I emerged from the fog of an early morning lecture,[/red] I encountered a remarkable document in the pages of the school newspaper. . . . Maybe, if was awake and paying attention in class during the lectures, he would know what was going on in the world enough to see that she is right... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 3:54:21 PM EDT
[#14]
Deliverator,I just have to ask. Same guy from somethingawful.com?
-T. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 4:02:08 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted: Deliverator,I just have to ask. Same guy from somethingawful.com? -T. No, not familiar with that site. Deliverator is the name of a character from the book "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 4:03:06 PM EDT
[#16]
They probably had to choose between her and Molly Ivins.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 4:03:36 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted: [b]It's Ann herself we loathe[/b] September 3, 2002 Setup, blah, blah. Explanation, blah, blah. More explanation, blah, blah. Yadda, Yadda, embarrassed that he didn't think to write it first. Blah, blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Ad hominem attack, blah, blah. Pity, blah, blah. Comical insolence, blah, blah. Ad hominem attack, yadda. Ad hominem attack. Unsubstantiated blah blah. Ad hominem attack, blah, blah, blah, blah. Penis envy (ironic eh?), yadda, blah, yadda, I'm an unsuccessful POS, blah, blah, she's more successful, blah. Ad hominem attack, blah, blah, I don't have a best-selling book, blah, blah, yadda, she does, I'm a weak-willed stupid shit, she's evil, blah, blah, blah. Worthless, blah, blah, yet somehow the best-seller (?), yadda, yadda. Interesting sociological matter, blah, blah, blah. Vitriol, hate, blah, blah, blah. Penis envy, blah, blah. Yadda, she isn't doing anything not already done by liberal columnists, yadda, yadda, but I'm too fucking retarded to see that, blah, blah. Physical appearance, yadda, yadda, ad hominem attack, sexist bullshit, blah, blah. Silicone interventions, she's no different (except that she's not a liberal, and she has a degree in law), more penis envy, blah, blah. Annoying ideologue, blah, blah, because she's smart, outspoken, and not a liberal, ad hominem attack, blah, blah. Ann, I hate you because you don't agree with me and because you are more successful and attractive, I'm a penisless, snivelling pile of shit and it's your fault, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda. Paul Whoeverthefuckthisguyis professor at some podunk University Reads like the infantile rantings of the leftist shithead who got turned down for a date. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 4:48:12 PM EDT
[#18]
I wrote him a message which basically said that he sucked and his whole problem with Ann was that he was too much of a douchbag to get into her pants.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:01:02 PM EDT
[#19]
Well let's just have a looksee.
[img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Fcoulter%2Ejpg[/img] Hey... wait a minute... wait just a minute... [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Fcoult%2Ejpg[/img] "It's a [b]MAN[/b] baby!" Seriously, I never understood it. Everyone's always talking about how beautiful she is and such. I've never considered her even vaguely attractive and I'm not sure why anyone would. I might add that I have never seen anyone treated so badly by a television makeup room so consistently. Even Margaret Thatcher manages to look something other than tired when she makes appearances. [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Fthatcher%2Ejpg[/img] I far prefer her brand of right-wing politics too. Coulter, while she has the gift of the gab, has never struck me as amazingly smart. She works very hard at making up the deficit by being overly caustic. I don't mind people who are controversial, so long as that's not all they are. There has to be more behind the blonde drapes than a inch of foundation and a quick powder of rouge. Really, after seeing her on this or that program, even for a scheduled appearance, I am shocked at how she looks. It just makes me think that behind the scenes, 45 minutes before airtime, some poor hairdresser/makeup artist named "Lance" has his career on the line with Ann in the chair, the prospect of making her presentable on the air seeming more and more like a distant dream (SuperLotto!) with every passing minute. "We're on in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1..." [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Fcoult2%2Ejpg[/img] ...and then the gasp from the CSPAN control room. "Oh GOD. Quick go to 60% illumination over Coulter. You, errand boy, go tell that Lance character he's fired. Does he think this is Jenny Jones? I want him out Ta-DAY." Every time I see her all I can picture is a worn out Edie Falco (Carmela Soprano) except Edie Falco is TRYING to look like a Peroxide-Blonde-treated-badly-by-the-years-of-barely-happy-marriage-to-the-cheating-murderer-who-nonetheless-made-me-the-First-Lady-of-the-New-Jersey-Mob. Ann Coulter is trying to look like an attractive journalist and serious political commentator. [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Ftwopeas%2Ejpg[/img] Apparently they do much better dye jobs at "Jessica's" in Suburban New Jersey. You know the place, where their speciality is 1.75 inch, my-husband-works-in-waste-disposal-pink colored nails and they have Days of Our Lives playing on the salon's T.V. all day. (Thank god for the Soap Opera Channel on cable). At least there they don't miss your roots and you don't end up with color abused hair and ratty split ends. Carmela always did have nice hair though- for a mob queen. Even scads of makeup doesn't seem to help poor Ann though- to the point that the only way to really photograph her well is to run the lens back to 28mm and make sure her legs occupy at least 50% of the vertical frame. But then, that's just a matter of doing the demographics on who wants to see/hear from her in the first place, isn't it. Give them what they want. It's not her voice. [img]www.ar15.com/members/albums/tatjana%2Fcoult3%2Ejpg[/img] Ah well. At least she sounds smart MOST of the time. Zooming that picture out enough is like going back in time and freezing frame before you broke the demarcation line. You know, when your walking along and down the street, or across the bar you catch a glimpse of something. All you see is long blond hair, a mostly slim figure and a pair of legs. Well, not to mention a low cut neckline and a lot of black. Your heart stops for a second because that's not the kind of competition you wanted this evening. The tall statuesque blonde. Great. Sure enough, all the guys are standing around, but there's hope. There's that tell-tale buffer zone. Not the usual 15 foot "I'm not really trying to decide to hit on you" zone, more like the 25 foot and above "I'm not close enough to see you're all used up yet because it's dark in here" zone of comfort. Any guy closer in than that zone, who has his contacts in, suddenly asks himself, "Hey, what did I do with my beer, and what happened to that brunette back where I was just standing?" - Tat (meow! so catty!) jana. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:14:03 PM EDT
[#20]
tatjana: I don't think you are supposed to find women attractive anyway, unless, of course, you are trying to tell us something (?). She does have a strange throat, I'll give you that. However, her worth as a person and commentator is not based on her looks. Her columns have always struck me as very well-written and lucid, but very vitriolic. Some claim that vitriole is the crutch of the intellectually inferior, I disagree. She works in a field dominated by people who constantly ridicule her for her political beliefs, looks, etc. One might end up being more than a little pissed off by such a situation. Her vitriolic attacks don't take the form of ad hominem groans, but instead are very a. truthful and b. targetted. She's extremely good at tearing a person completely to pieces. Think of The_Macallan or McUZI on this site.
I've had the pleasure of meeting her in person, she is quite attractive, if a bit old looking (too much sun worshipping me thinks), and the hair is definetly a turn-off, but I've never liked artificial hair anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:31:02 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted: tatjana: I don't think you are supposed to find women attractive anyway, unless, of course, you are trying to tell us something (?). I am. I'm trying to tell you that we're much less prone to being blinded by the glare that Coulter seems to be dazzling people with. She does have a strange throat, I'll give you that. However, her worth as a person and commentator is not based on her looks. Luckily! Unfortunately for her, I really don't think she carries that event either. Her columns have always struck me as very well-written and lucid, but very vitriolic. And I appreciate that when it's married to some kind of insight, some sort of foundation (not the Mary-Kay kind). Someone like Buckley Jr. is just as vitriolic, but manages to throw it from a elevated position- the complete inability of his intellect NOT to bleed from every pore of his being. Coulter just doesn't have it upstairs the way modern right commentators need to- given that they are destined to be besieged by media static. Their signal to noise ratio has got to be higher. Coulter's isn't. Instead she makes blanket statements about, e.g., Muslims and relies on the cascade reaction (star-trek moment of the day) to carry her message. Suddenly someone says "My Lords, the house will divide" and the left and the right are squabbling over her caustic remarks. The result, she "inspires discussion" and gets away with looking like a political commentator. That's not debate, in my view. Some claim that vitriole is the crutch of the intellectually inferior, I disagree. She works in a field dominated by people who constantly ridicule her for her political beliefs, looks, etc. One might end up being more than a little pissed off by such a situation. It's self-fulfilling. People attack her politics because she can't seem to express them without being vitriolic. As a result she tars conservatives generally with the brush that liberals have so much practice using, that conservatives are racist demagogs. Coulter fits right in- the same way Jackson or Sharpton just keep throwing softballs to the Right by being everything that is worst about the left and being proud of it. Her vitriolic attacks don't take the form of ad hominem groans, but instead are very a. truthful and b. targetted. She's extremely good at tearing a person completely to pieces. Think of The_Macallan or McUZI on this site. I'm not impressed with anyone who can't write a single paragraph without a personal attack. I've had the pleasure of meeting her in person, she is quite attractive, if a bit old looking (too much sun worshipping me thinks), and the hair is definetly a turn-off, but I've never liked artificial hair anyway. Silly boy. ALL of our hair is eventually artificial. It's just a question of HOW artificial. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:39:37 PM EDT
[#22]
Well, that article I posted basically insinuated the only reason anyone pays attention to Ann Coulter is because she's attractive, which is terribly dismissive and not what people like about her in the first place.
She's not the most attractive girl I've ever seen, no, but her looks aren't what I love about her first and foremost. I love her mean-spirited rhetoric (I like mean-spirited humor in general, not just conservative political rhetoric). I find her hilarious, and often burst out laughing reading her columns. I love how over the top and outrageous she is, mixing extremely vicious insults with crushing proof, logic, and reasoned argument. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:45:21 PM EDT
[#23]
Meow!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:53:33 PM EDT
[#24]
Ann Coulter =
Tatjana = <> |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 5:59:32 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted: Ann Coulter = Tatjana = <> Anne Coulter = Tatjana = |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 6:55:50 PM EDT
[#26]
Quoted: Quoted: Ann Coulter = Tatjana = <> Anne Coulter = Tatjana = Ha! Well, if you're going to play that game... Tatjana = Anne Coulter = Actually, I was just going to comment that the arguments you make against her are the same arguments she documents as being common tactics of the liberal elite and New York pseudo-intelligentsia. I don't think she's a ravishing beauty either, but I hold many of the same beliefs she holds and I'm happy to have her on our side. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:00:55 PM EDT
[#27]
To get through the University of Michigan Law School as a right wing woman is quite a feat. I barely made it, and I am a guy.
As far as looks, for that school she is the hottest thing on two legs. They pick 'em and graduate 'em ugly in Ann Arbor. Her book is good. Her articles are good most of the time. As a sop to tat, your FAQ is great, and if I had a thing for camo babes you would be a top choice. That reminds me, how liberal is sandhurst? Is it berkley with guns? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:14:41 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted: To get through the University of Michigan Law School as a right wing woman is quite a feat. I barely made it, and I am a guy. Yeah Gary, I wondered how you graduated considering your humble political action tendencies. LOL[:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:17:58 PM EDT
[#29]
I was lucky and I scared them.
[:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:21:23 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ann Coulter = Tatjana = <> Anne Coulter = Tatjana = Ha! Well, if you're going to play that game... Tatjana = Anne Coulter = THAT's sexual prime? Wow. Ok. Actually, I was just going to comment that the arguments you make against her are the same arguments she documents as being common tactics of the liberal elite and New York pseudo-intelligentsia. I don't think she's a ravishing beauty either, but I hold many of the same beliefs she holds and I'm happy to have her on our side. I just happen to think there are conserative commentators with a lot more going for them who don't ride on the novelity of being tall and blonde. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:35:50 PM EDT
[#31]
I think we can guess where this Unger guy is coming from...
Ann Coulter represents a lot of things that a lot of people don't have, and so she provokes jealousy among people who are dissatisfied with themselves to one degree or another. At the same time, she challenges a few sterotypes, which in itself throws people off. What? Brains AND Conservative AND Female AND good Looking? Can't have none o' that! And lets not forget success. Lots of journalists aren't that highly paid, even when you work for the Centre Daily Times (hadn't ever heard of it until this popped up). It must be hell to see someone you hate so much doing so well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:46:06 PM EDT
[#32]
She represents herself and the sale of her books.She jumps on the right wing anti-liberal
bandwagon. She's a phony. She gets in the public eye and sells shock value ala Howard Stern. I agree with most of what she says but she seems to exploit the way us non-PCer's feel |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:47:20 PM EDT
[#33]
She represents herself and the sale of her books.She jumps on the right wing anti-liberal
bandwagon. She's a phony. She gets in the public eye and sells shock value ala Howard Stern. I agree with most of what she says but she seems to exploit the way us non-PCer's feel |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 7:55:26 PM EDT
[#34]
To be fair... I do believe Tatjana is a better shot then Mrs. Coultier.
Which is really the only measure that really counts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 8:21:50 PM EDT
[#35]
I like Coulter. She's mildly cute in an unexpected sort of way for an intelligent, hard-core conservative.
Yes, while caustic, she seems to excel at hyperbole once reserved exclusively for the libs, but she does it SOOO much better, and manages to tell the sometimes hurtful truth while at it. That's really what gets to the libs. Logical, reasoned arguments based upon FACT that is not PC sugar coated like so much cod-liver oil and that don't play to mere emotion. ("Let's not hurt anyone's feelings now." Even if it means not searching Hassim's ticking carry-on for fear of offending the PC crowd.) Now, having extolled Ms. Coulter's virtues, let's talk about [b]Laura Ingraham[/b]. [url]http://www.lauraingraham.com/public/[/url] SHE is a babe. Every bit as right wing as Coulter and better looking to boot (similiar look but more fem--just prettier). She's also a lawyer (conducive to making properly reasoned arguments) and has a great sense of humor. Listen to her radio show and you will see. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 9:49:06 PM EDT
[#36]
At the risk of getting this thread locked, like most of the other threads concerning such things(ie. people mobbing Tatjana), I will freely and honestly state that I find Tatjana to be both more attractive and better at ballistic gelatin testing than Ms. Coulter.
Besides, she carries an H&K P7. What more need I say? Juggernaut |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 10:12:27 PM EDT
[#37]
I think Ann is very attractive also but there is no disputing that OUR OWN miss tatjanas beauty leaves Ann at the curb![rolleyes]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2002 10:23:53 PM EDT
[#38]
I actually think Coulter is kinda ugly, but I love watching her rip some smartass liberal with the same tired old skewed liberal argument up on TV. Classic...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2002 5:49:46 AM EDT
[#39]
Damn, from someone who has never shown herself other than in cammo or a tenth of a second face shot. That's pretty ruff. Post ten pics of yourself at full length and different angles and lets see the comments? Show yourself?????
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2002 8:41:53 AM EDT
[#40]
Quoted: Silly boy. ALL of our hair is eventually artificial. It's just a question of HOW artificial. Haha. Yeah, in Europe. I don't think I've ever actually seen a European woman who doesn't dye her hair. The worst by far are the German "redhaeds." Now, in the U.S. (which is sadly becoming more like Europe everyday), it's not anywhere near as common, but hair-dying is growing in popularity (again, sadly). At least that's what I've observed. [red]I consider the use of the word "boy" specifically targetted at me as a personal attack. I am a man and view being called a "boy" by YOU of all the self-righteous, narcissitic people in the world as a violation of board code. (Yes, I know it wasn't meant as a personal attack, but I don't give a shit.)[/red] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2002 8:48:12 AM EDT
[#41]
Quoted: To get through the University of Michigan Law School as a right wing woman is quite a feat. I barely made it, and I am a guy. As far as looks, for that school she is the hottest thing on two legs. They pick 'em and graduate 'em ugly in Ann Arbor. Wasn't the old saying "9 out of 10 Big-Ten women are beautiful and the 10th goes to UofM?" I remember siting out on the Diag (or in the UGLI) thinking to myself "Can you possibly put ANY MORE hair on the legs of a woman??" |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2002 4:30:12 PM EDT
[#42]
Quoted: Damn, from someone who has never shown herself other than in cammo or a tenth of a second face shot. That's pretty ruff. Post ten pics of yourself at full length and different angles and lets see the comments? Show yourself????? Actually, some smartass (who shall remain nameless) posted about 12 shots of me on here not that long ago, including at least two closeups and one rather embarassing one. There are quite enough floating around of me, thank-you-very-much. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 4:13:54 AM EDT
[#43]
Lets see some nudity.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 5:56:13 AM EDT
[#44]
C'mon Tatjana! You are smart enough to understand that guys might still find someone who is less attractive than you, beautiful.
I'm sure that if you had a ballistics show on OLN with Brouhaha, we would be giving you the {smileysex} tags. Not that some don't already! ;) |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 7:13:31 AM EDT
[#45]
Wish I could fire Ann Coulter [shock]
BTW, Tatjana, could you post links to those pictures of you? [:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 7:35:28 AM EDT
[#46]
Quoted: Quoted: Damn, from someone who has never shown herself other than in cammo or a tenth of a second face shot. That's pretty ruff. Post ten pics of yourself at full length and different angles and lets see the comments? Show yourself????? Actually, some smartass (who shall remain nameless) posted about 12 shots of me on here not that long ago, including at least two closeups and one rather embarassing one. There are quite enough floating around of me, thank-you-very-much. Link? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 8:19:17 AM EDT
[#47]
Quoted: This tactic is familiar, and has been used against me. When you can't argue the facts, pour some emotional accelerant on the ......... Damn, a thread about Ann Coulter and you turn it into 'everybody's pickin' on me'. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 11:11:13 AM EDT
[#48]
Quoted: I think Ann is very attractive also but there is no disputing that OUR OWN miss tatjanas beauty leaves Ann at the curb![rolleyes] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 11:14:26 AM EDT
[#49]
Quoted: Quoted: I think Ann is very attractive also but there is no disputing that OUR OWN miss tatjanas beauty leaves Ann at the curb![rolleyes] Please use the provided air sickness bag. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2002 11:23:29 AM EDT
[#50]
I knew you would be watching this thread closely.......trying to get a few compliments here or there for your female ego!you women just can't help it!........anyway.......I think tat is a beautiful woman....but she's mean too! just ask her she will be gald to prove it!
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
