User Panel
Posted: 11/19/2012 6:16:07 PM EDT
When it comes to a gun not having a purpose.
Can a gun just be a piece of metal/plastic/wood that does nothing but expel a bullet down range? I know a lot of companies market their gun with some purpose that is non-existent the judge mossbergs tacitcool line etc just to name a few... I do not think those gun would replace a serious duty weapon but just for the sake of shooting are not all guns ok? to some extent |
|
Quoted:
No, guns are icky Mkay!? - Clint This. Guns are icky poo poo. Wait, this website is about GUNS?!? |
|
Some people are just born with sand in their sensitive parts.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
No, guns are icky Mkay!? - Clint This. Guns are icky poo poo. Wait, this website is about GUNS?!? I am here just for the Math and Science section. |
|
Quoted:
When it comes to a gun not having a purpose. Can a gun just be a piece of metal/plastic/wood that does nothing but expel a bullet down range? I know a lot of companies market their gun with some purpose that is non-existent the judge mossbergs tacitcool line etc just to name a few... I do not think those gun would replace a serious duty weapon but just for the sake of shooting are not all guns ok? to some extent There is ALWAYS some fucktard who has an opinion on what someone else shoots, or does. USPSA, IDPA, CAS, Hunting...there's always gonna be some idiot who has something negative to say. It's one of the ARF paradoxes... FREEEEDDDOOOMMMM.....Until you are doing something that "I" Dont Like or Do.... |
|
I'm with you OP, I see people just asking why when someone buys a Chainsaw or Judge. Because they want to and guns are awesome, unless it's an AK
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
When it comes to a gun not having a purpose. Can a gun just be a piece of metal/plastic/wood that does nothing but expel a bullet down range? I know a lot of companies market their gun with some purpose that is non-existent the judge mossbergs tacitcool line etc just to name a few... I do not think those gun would replace a serious duty weapon but just for the sake of shooting are not all guns ok? to some extent There is ALWAYS some fucktard who has an opinion on what someone else shoots, or does. USPSA, IDPA, CAS, Hunting...there's always gonna be some idiot who has something negative to say. It's one of the ARF paradoxes... FREEEEDDDOOOMMMM.....Until you are doing something that "I" Dont Like or Do.... Advocating freedom means not trying to prohibit other people from doing things you disagree with; it doesn't mean having shitty taste. |
|
Quoted: This gun (not mine, it belongs to a friend of mine): http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/ZZZardoz/Firearms/_DER0206.jpg Has but 2 reasons to exist. The first is to blast apart large containers of water. The other is to do this: http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/ZZZardoz/Gunshots/Muzzleflash2.jpg while doing that. To all the purists: You better be damned GLAD I altered the rifle. It ups the collector value of the other 30-something MILLION of these that are out there. Looks like fun! |
|
Quoted:
When it comes to a gun not having a purpose. Can a gun just be a piece of metal/plastic/wood that does nothing but expel a bullet down range? I know a lot of companies market their gun with some purpose that is non-existent the judge mossbergs tacitcool line etc just to name a few... I do not think those gun would replace a serious duty weapon but just for the sake of shooting are not all guns ok? to some extent I have no problem with the Judge, although it is vastly overrated. The people who buy the Judge and tell me all the bullshit they heard about it on the internet, and tell my customers to buy a Judge because you don't have to aim it; they give me a headache. The Mossberg tacticool line offends my sensibilities. They give the impression that Mossber has the opinion,"Those dopes will buy anything as long as it's matte black and it has rails on it." Imagine if Mossberg made a hunting rifle that came with a scope and one cartridge and marketed it to people who wanted to go hunting and not shoot the gun until they see a deer. It's for guys who want to run around the woods with a loaded rifle and no idea what they're doing. A flat, black lever action with a telestock and multiple rails is the same thing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
This gun (not mine, it belongs to a friend of mine): http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/ZZZardoz/Firearms/_DER0206.jpg Has but 2 reasons to exist. The first is to blast apart large containers of water. The other is to do this: http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/ZZZardoz/Gunshots/Muzzleflash2.jpg while doing that. To all the purists: You better be damned GLAD I altered the rifle. It ups the collector value of the other 30-something MILLION of these that are out there. Looks like fun! Oh it is, trust me. And, when you tell people that it doesn't kick, everybody wants to shoot it. |
|
Quoted: I just wanted to post this here http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/elevensecdb8/CIMG1519.jpg I am not really sure what the hell it is but it looks like fun too. |
|
Because that majority sees the only purpose of a gun is to kill people. That's the end all be all reason for the existence of guns. They do not see the sporting use.
|
|
Marketing is a pretty important part of being successful in business.
|
|
Quoted:
Some people are just born with sand in their sensitive parts. If they get lucky, maybe someday that clam will spit out a pearl! |
|
I have no problem with the Judge per se. It's the tard who actually thinks a Judge is a superior to a 9mm etc for self defense.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Because on a fundamental level, pieces of shit like this are an affront to both form AND function. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q285/ragin_cajun_photos/37204.jpg Serious question - what is that? Airsoft? .22? |
|
Quoted:
A .50BMG SBR? I bet the muzzle flash/blast is...um...impressive. Probably isn't safe to park a car next to it.
I just wanted to post this here http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/elevensecdb8/CIMG1519.jpg |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because on a fundamental level, pieces of shit like this are an affront to both form AND function. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q285/ragin_cajun_photos/37204.jpg Serious question - what is that? Airsoft? .22? It's a Mossberg 715, tactical .22LR. You can get them for $250.00. |
|
Just shows that even as bad a shape as
we are in, all we really have are first world problems. People simply don't have enough to worry about. Add in the appeal of self satisfied smugness...Hey, how could people NOT be butt hurt about something as trivial as that? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because on a fundamental level, pieces of shit like this are an affront to both form AND function. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q285/ragin_cajun_photos/37204.jpg Serious question - what is that? Airsoft? .22? It's a Mossberg 715, tactical .22LR. You can get them for $250.00. Thanks! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I just wanted to post this here http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/elevensecdb8/CIMG1519.jpg What the fuck is that? I think I want one. That sir is a whole lot of awesome in a small package, SBR 50. I dont know the details of it, but I know the brass has to be coated in robitussin. |
|
The arguing that used to go on fairly constantly about .380 and, well pretty much any handgun that wasn't a Smith, 1911, or Glock, was a good example of that. Seemed like the only purpose some folks think a handgun could have was concealed carry. I have three .380's and none of them were bought for carry.
Counting hunting rifles, I might have half a dozen guns that were bought for a specific purpose.... Maybe not that many. Hell, I have three single action .45LC revolvers and no use for any of them. I once bought a Ruger Single Six because I only had one .22 revolver. That was a good enough reason for me. Guns are fun. I like buying new toys, and shooting one for the first time is a neat feeling. The ones that don't make me smile that first time don't stay around for long, but that's rare (Mauser M2 and Mini-14 are two that leap to mind) Purpose? To help me and my sons enjoy being in the mountains together. Once defense is taken care of, can anyone think of a better purpose? |
|
If I could I would have one of every non-practical gun in the world just because it is Fun to shoot...
|
|
Honestly, I fall into that group. I don't get my feelings hurt but for some reason, every gun has to have a reason to be in my collection. I am not in much of a collecting mood lately, I'm just into mags and ammo, no more guns for a while.
To me, I don't want to start getting "fun guns" until the bases are covered in my book. Must haves are at least one AR15 in 5.56 12GA shotgun 9mm Pistol for that can be carried daily .22LR Rifle and an extra one for me, would be a .45acp handgun that can be carried daily. Everything else is for "sport" or whatever. Right now, I have one fun gun that is going to become my HD rifle and that's my Daniel Defense DDM4V5 300 blackout rifle. In the future the guns that have really no purpose that I would like to have are Judge PPK NAA .22 revolver |
|
I dont know about the rest of you, but a gun that I buy has a purpose that justifies the outlay of cash.
|
|
Quoted:
I dont know about the rest of you, but a gun that I buy has a purpose that justifies the outlay of cash. always budget your fun first... fun is a justification for me... |
|
What I want to know is why people get so upset about people modifying "historic" firearms.
|
|
Quoted:
What I want to know is why people get so upset about people modifying "historic" firearms. You mean like drilling and tapping an original 1886 to install a T 1. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I just wanted to post this here http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/elevensecdb8/CIMG1519.jpg What the fuck is that? I think I want one. That sir is a whole lot of awesome in a small package, SBR 50. I dont know the details of it, but I know the brass has to be coated in robitussin. Impressive considering what I'd coat my shorts with shooting next to it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
What I want to know is why people get so upset about people modifying "historic" firearms. You mean like drilling and tapping an original 1886 to install a T 1. Send one to the Mossberg custom shop. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
What I want to know is why people get so upset about people modifying "historic" firearms. You mean like drilling and tapping an original 1886 to install a T 1. Ya, kind of like that. It's that person's firearm; what is the big deal? |
|
I like all guns, won't find me bitching any. See the same shit on knife forums, how can you be a gun or knife nut if ya don't love em all?
|
|
To the OP's question, I think the guns are OK, I guess I have more of a problem with the marketing and the people that will buy into it. For example the judge, is a fine self defense gun if using 45 colt and a good trail gun with the 410 option. Where it fails is how it is marketed is using .410 bird shot for self defense. Ammo makers are even making defense ammo for it. Not a problem with the gun, just the marketing. Mossberg's chainsaw shotgun just seems dangerous to me. Their tacticool 30-30 I have no real problems with it per se, but I will laugh at someone that owns it.
|
|
Quoted:
always budget your fun first... fun is a justification for me... My bills are budgeted first. I can find a multitude of ways to have 'fun" that don't involve spending huge sums of cash if I am tight on money when everything is paid for the month. However, if I fail to pay my bills, that has a cascading negative effect on my quality of life. Quoted:
What I want to know is why people get so upset about people modifying "historic" firearms. Do you mean true historic guns or repro guns? I don't like the look of optics on historic designs like lever actions. I understand that some people have to resort to them because of failing vision, etc. It seems that some people don't want to shoot a gun if it doesn't have a red dot on it |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
always budget your fun first... fun is a justification for me... My bills are budgeted first. I can find a multitude of ways to have 'fun" that don't involve spending huge sums of cash if I am tight on money when everything is paid for the month. However, if I fail to pay my bills, that has a cascading negative effect on my quality of life. of course you pay your bills first....how else can you know how much you will have for a "Fun" budget |
|
I get annoyed because I don't see a firearm as a toy. They command respect because at their heart they're deadly weapons. Go down the road of disrespecting them makes it dangerous to be around shooters who take them lightly.
|
|
Quoted:
of course you pay your bills first....how else can you know how much you will have for a "Fun" budget I have no fun budget. I eek out a few bucks for stuff I want to do or things I want to buy. It is setting up to be a major issue in the divorce. Way I see it from reading posts here over teh years, married couples budget in one of two ways They have seperate accounts that their respective paychecks to to, split the bills down the middle and anything thats left over is theirs to do with as they please. They have a joint account that everything goes into and everything is paid out of. Anything left over is spent by agreement It hasn't been that way here in 20 years and its an issue. Now back to our regular programming |
|
Quoted:
To the OP's question, I think the guns are OK, I guess I have more of a problem with the marketing and the people that will buy into it. For example the judge, is a fine self defense gun if using 45 colt and a good trail gun with the 410 option. Where it fails is how it is marketed is using .410 bird shot for self defense. Ammo makers are even making defense ammo for it. Not a problem with the gun, just the marketing. Truth in marketing would be what I say to someone with a Judge Jones......Well it's good for snakes and such. Myself I've bought four threaded vintage Mossberg .22s and a threaded Remington Speedmaster and will pick up another threaded Mossberg this coming Saturday and I don't even own the first can. |
|
If it's an operable firearm, it's O.K. with me. I may not want to own it, but I don't care if someone else does.
|
|
Quoted:
have you not seen some of the guns out there...the bad guys would be near impossible to hit because of two reasons either they will be laughing so hard at the weird gun you are pointing at them and hence a hard target. or two the gun is so useless that it is too hard to hit anything with and no one said that respect and safety should not be utilized while having fun with your useless gun... like this one that I want http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a105/mauser348/zip2230rd.jpg http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a105/mauser348/zip2210rd.jpg and while this .22 could kill someone I do not think you can argue that it will be anything but a fun gun for 99% of the people who buy it Thank you. I know I can't say it without sounding like more of a dick than usual so I try to just keep quiet when I see that kind of comment. My liberal mother used to say "guns are not toys!" every time I wanted a cap gun, water pistol, BB gun, etc. and it's fairly annoying to continue hearing that as a 44 year old married father. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.