As if that's news to anyone![:D]
But [u]this[/u] is always good to read:
[size=4]DASCHLE SHOULD MIND HIS OWN BIG BIZ[/size=4]
By DEBORAH ORIN
July 11, 2002 -- THERE'S a distinct whiff of hypocrisy about the Democratic bid - with Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle heading the charge - to paint Bush & Co. as too "cozy" with big business to really crack down on crooked CEOs.
It smells of hypocrisy because Daschle is pretty cozy with big business himself, since it's a major source of his family income. His wife, Linda, is one of Washington's premier lobbyists.
But you can [i][b]fuhgeddaboutit[/b][/i] if you want to know how much money the Daschles rake in from her lobbying as a co-chair of the "public policy group" at the law/lobbying firm Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell.
[b]Tom Daschle is demanding President Bush release every possible document about a 1990 stock sale to "just let everybody see what is there." [/b]
[b]But unlike lots of senators - not to mention presidents like Bush - Daschle refuses to release his own tax returns, which would "just let everybody see" what his wife makes as a big-business lobbyist.[/b]
Daschle spokeswoman Ranit Smelzer defended his refusal, saying: "Most Americans guard very closely this information [tax returns], and members of Congress should not be forced to release it."
Daschle's Senate financial-disclosure forms keep it secret, too - they just list Linda Daschle's lobbying income from some of America's biggest firms as "over $1,000." Make that a lot over $1,000.
Daschle and his wife insist she avoids conflicts of interest because she doesn't lobby the Senate - though she does lobby next door in the House, where lawmakers certainly know her hubby.
Among her clients: American Airlines, the American Trucking Assn., American Concrete and Pavement Association, Boeing, Loral Space and Communications, Northwest Airlines, L-3 Communications, Intelli-check, Schering-Plough, United Technologies Corp. and more than a dozen more.
Take Loral, which paid a $14 million fine last January to settle charges of illegally sending sensitive missile technology to China.
In 2001 alone - the latest data - Loral paid $460,000 to Linda Daschle's firm for lobbying by her and four colleagues.
The conflict-of-interest question gets even more delicate when it comes to L-3 because it involves potential risks to airline passenger safety.
L-3 hired Linda Daschle and her firm when airlines balked at buying L-3 bomb-detecting devices to screen airline baggage because they were inferior to a competitor, The Washington Post reported last fall.
But after Linda Daschle got on the case, Congress inserted an "unusually explicit directive" ordering the FAA to buy one device from L-3 for every rival model from InVision.
[b]"The connections apparently paid off . . . [u]but [last October] the Transportation Department's inspector general agreed with industry critics that L-3's machines were not performing[/u]," the newspaper reported.[/b]
See article at:[url]http://www.nypost.com/commentary/52305.htm[/url]
Hmmm, even more reason to doubt the sanity of everyone in South Dakota![:D]
George W. carried South Dakota by almost 62% in 2000 Election, but y'all continue to send back one of the biggest obstacles to moving this country in the direction it needs to go!
'Splain [u]that[/u], Lucy!
Eric The(IsLifeSoDear...)Hun[>]:)]