While looking for a company named Bick, I came upon this transcript.  

A guy named Gilewicz was evidently shot by police after an series of disputes involving alleged threats back & forth (supposedly including explosives) and the neighbor coming onto his property and pounding his ass.  The guy was holed up in his house with a shotgun, which he may or may not have used against the police.  He can't say, cause he's dead, possibly having been shot by their SOG, which sounds to be like a SWAT team.  There was also a question about his "crop".

It is veeery looong and sometimes boring, but then it also has questions of planted evidence, officers giving witness against each other, and commissioners speculating away discrepancies in testimony, people changing their stories, etc.

Very interesting is how they discuss an SKS found in a shed, why it wasn't loaded, why he didn't have it in the house.  You will have to form your own opinion, but their thought process seems pretty odd to me.

I don't know what conclusion they reached, if any -  I read for about an hour and I'm perhaps 1/3 of the way through it.  They might have not reached ANY conclusion until sometime later.


[url]www.gci.tas.gov.au/transcript/050900.html[url]

DOH!!!!  Thank you, Duncan.  Can't believe I didn't check it.



KRP

It seems pretty weird - they claim the guy fired his shotgun at them, but the empty cartridge is marked inconsistently with the shot they found.  

And in one part, they're not sure if what they found was lead shot or bird shit.  Or did the source mean 'bird shot', not 'bird shit'?