I looked through the leupold back when it came out and it didn't suit my needs at all. I have an Eotech because I like the open field of view, a 1moa dot for precision, and it's just about as fast as you can get with target aquisition. My son has the Strikefire on his, and likes it a lot. He can pick up on the 4moa dot very quickly, and doesn't look for precision beyond about 300yds. He can hit a torso sized target every time out to 300 and most of the time with his Spikes 5.56 M4, (80%) out to 400, but he needs a little help at five right now, ( 50%) . With my hand loads ( 6.8spc II 90gr tnt at 2950fps) I can get 7 inch 5 shot groups prone with the Eotech, ( that same load got me .433 best 5 shot group at 100 and 3 others under .500, one at .590 with the scope). I had to sell my scope a while back and I'm looking for something to compliment the two optics that we have. I will be putting them in Larue fts mounts. My main need for it is load development. and to feel better about shots over 300 on deer or coyotes. I don't think the quality of the glass is so much better on the aimpoint or eotech brand to be worht the extra cash. I've looked at and handled them and the Burris, and they seem to be similar. I don't know about the cheaper ones.The other thing is the overall quality, where the price is worth it, but I think the Burris is very close. I just haven't had an opportunity ato see how decent the lower cost ones like Primary and others are. So anyone with experience good or bad with these let me know.
Thanks guys.