User Panel
Posted: 4/4/2022 7:28:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: anothermisanthrope]
Big thanks to DaGoose for consolidating The Files so far:
Originally Posted By DaGoose: Originally Posted By DaGoose: Posting all the links again. THE TWITTER FILES - PART ONE TWITTER AND THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY
Recounting the internal drama at Twitter surrounding the decision to block access to a New York Post exposé on Hunter Biden in October, 2020. Key revelations: Twitter blocked the story on the basis of its “hacked materials” policy, but executives internally knew the decision was problematic. “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?” is how comms official Brandon Borrman put it. Also: when a Twitter contractor polls members of Congress about the decision, they hear Democratic members want more moderation, not less, and “the First Amendment isn’t absolute.” THE TWITTER FILES - PART ONE SUPPLEMENTAL THE “EXITING” OF TWITTER DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL JIM BAKER
A second round of Twitter Files releases was delayed, as new addition Bari Weiss discovers former FBI General Counsel and Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker was reviewing the first batches of Twitter Files documents, whose delivery to reporters had slowed. THE TWITTER FILES - PART TWO TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
Bari Weiss gives a long-awaited answer to the question, “Was Twitter shadow-banning people?” It did, only the company calls it “visibility filtering.” Twitter also had a separate, higher council called SIP-PES that decided cases for high-visibility, controversial accounts. Key revelations: Twitter had a huge toolbox for controlling the visibility of any user, including a “Search Blacklist” (for Dan Bongino), a “Trends Blacklist” for Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and a “Do Not Amplify” setting for conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Weiss quotes a Twitter employee: “Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool.” With help from @abigailshrier, @shellenbergermd, @nelliebowles, and @isaacgrafstein. THE TWITTER FILES - PART THREE THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP - October 2020 - January 6th
First in a three-part series looking at how Twitter came to the decision to suspend Donald Trump. The idea behind the series is to show how all of Twitter’s “visibility filtering” tools were on display and deployed after January 6th, 2021. Key Revelations: Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth not only met regularly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, but with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Also, Twitter was aggressively applying “visibility filtering” tools to Trump well before the election. THE TWITTER FILES - PART FOUR THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP - January 7
This thread by Michael Shellenberger looks at the key day after the J6 riots and before Trump would ultimately be banned from Twitter on January 8th, showing how Twitter internally reconfigured its rules to make a Trump ban fit their policies. Key revelations: at least one Twitter employee worried about a “slippery slope” in which “an online platform CEO with a global presence… can gatekeep speech for the entire world,” only to be shot down. Also, chief censor Roth argues for a ban on congressman Matt Gaetz even though it “doesn’t quite fit anywhere (duh),” and Twitter changed its “public interest policy” to clear a path for Trump’s removal. THE TWITTER FILES - PART FIVE THE REMOVAL OF TRUMP FROM TWITTER.
As angry as many inside Twitter were with Donald Trump after the January 6th Capitol riots, staffers struggled to suspend his account, saying things like, “I think we’d have a hard time saying this is incitement.” As documented by Weiss, they found a way to pull the trigger anyway. Key revelations: there were dissenters in the company (“Maybe because I am from China,” said one employee, “I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation”), but are overruled by senior executives like Vijaya Gadde and Roth, who noted many on Twitter’s staff were citing the “Banality of Evil,” and comparing those who favored sticking to a strict legalistic interpretation of Twitter’s rules — i.e. keep Trump, who had “no violation” — to “Nazis following orders.” THE TWITTER FILES - PART SIX THE FBI SUBSIDIARY
Twitter’s contact with the FBI was “constant and pervasive,” as FBI personnel, mainly in the San Francisco field office, regularly sent lists of “reports” to Twitter, often about Americans with low follower counts making joke tweets. Tweeters on both the left and the right were affected. Key revelations: A senior Twitter executive reports, “FBI was adamant no impediments to sharing” classified information exist. Twitter also agreed to “bounce” content on the recommendations of a wide array of governmental and quasi-governmental actors, from the FBI to the Homeland Security agency CISA to Stanford’s Election Integrity Project to state governments. The company one day received so many moderation requests from the FBI, an executive congratulated staffers at the end for completing the “monumental undertaking.” THE TWITTER FILES - PART SEVEN THE FBI AND TTHE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP
The Twitter Files story increases its focus on the company’s relationship to federal law enforcement and intelligence, and shows intense communication between the FBI and Twitter just before the release of the Post’s Hunter Biden story. Key Revelations: San Francisco agent Elvis Chan “sends 10 documents to Twitter’s then-Head of Site Integrity, Yoel Roth, through Teleporter, a one-way communications channel from the FBI to Twitter,” the evening before the release of the Post story. Also, Baker in an email explains Twitter was compensated for “processing requests” by the FBI, saying “I am happy to report we have collected $3,415,323 since October 2019!” THE TWITTER FILES - PART EIGHT TWITTER AND PENTAGON'S COVERT ONLINE PSYOP CAMPAIGN
RELATED ARTICLE https://theintercept.com/2022/12/20/twitter-dod-us-military-accounts Lee Fang takes a fascinating detour, looking at how Twitter for years approved and supported Pentagon-backed covert operations. Noting the company explicitly testified to Congress that it didn’t allow such behavior, the platform nonetheless was a clear partner in state-backed programs involving fake accounts. Key revelations: after the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) sent over a list of 52 Arab-language accounts “we use to amplify certain messages,” Twitter agreed to “whitelist” them. Ultimately the program would be outed in the Washington Post in 2022 — two years after Twitter and other platforms stopped assisting — but contrary to what came out in those reports, Twitter knew about and/or assisted in these programs for at least three years, from 2017-2020. THE TWITTER FILES TWITTER AND "OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES"
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/twitter-files-thread-the-spies-who The Christmas Eve thread (I should have waited a few days to publish!) further details how the channels of communication between the federal government and Twitter operated, and reveals that Twitter directly or indirectly received lists of flagged content from “Other Government Agencies,” i.e. the CIA. Key revelations: CIA officials attended at least one conference with Twitter in the summer of 2020, and companies like Twitter and Facebook received “OGA briefings,” at their regular “industry” meetings held in conjunction with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The FBI and the “Foreign Influence Task Force” met regularly “not just with Twitter, but with Yahoo!, Twitch, Cloudfare, LinkedIn, even Wikimedia.” THE TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER RIGGED THE COVID DEBATE
David Zweig drills down into how Twitter throttled down information about COVID that was true but perhaps inconvenient for public officials, “discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed.” Key Revelations: Zweig found memos from Twitter personnel who’d liaised with Biden administration officials who were “very angry” that Twitter had not deplatformed more accounts. White House officials for instance wanted attention on reporter Alex Berenson. Zweig also found “countless” instances of Twitter banning or labeling “misleading” accounts that were true or merely controversial. A Rhode Island physician named Andrew Bostom, for instance, was suspended for, among other things, referring to the results of a peer-reviewed study on mRNA vaccines. THE TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER LET THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IN
THE TWITTER FILES: TWITTER AND THE FBI “BELLY BUTTON”
These two threads focus respectively on the second half of 2017, and a period stretching roughly from summer of 2020 through the present. The first describes how Twitter fell under pressure from Congress and the media to produce “material” showing a conspiracy of Russian accounts on their platform, and the second shows how Twitter tried to resist fulfilling moderation requests for the State Department, but ultimately agreed to let State and other agencies send requests through the FBI, which agent Chan calls “the belly button of the USG.” Revelations: at the close of 2017, Twitter makes a key internal decision. Outwardly, the company would claim independence and promise that content would only be removed at “our sole discretion.” The internal guidance says, in writing, that Twitter will remove accounts “identified by the U.S. intelligence community” as “identified by the U.S.. intelligence community as a state-sponsored entity conducting cyber-operations.” The second thread shows how Twitter took in requests from everyone — Treasury, HHS, NSA, FBI, DHS, etc. — and also received personal requests from politicians like Democratic congressman Adam Schiff, who asked to have journalist Paul Sperry suspended. THE TWITTER FILES #14 - THE RUSSIAGATE LIES
THE TWITTER FILES #15 - MOVE OVER, JAYSON BLAIR: TWITTER FILES EXPOSE NEXT GREAT MEDIA FRAUD
THE TWITTER FILES #16 - COMIC INTERLUDE: A MEDIA EXPERIMENT
THE TWITTER FILES #17 - NEW KNOWLEDGE, THE GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER, AND STATE-SPONSORED BLACKLISTS
THE TWITTER FILES #18 - STATEMENT TO CONGRESS THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
THE TWITTER FILES #19 - THE GREAT COVID-19 LIE MACHINE STANFORD, THE VIRALITY PROJECT, AND THE CENSORSHIP OF “TRUE STORIES”
THE TWITTER FILES - SUPPLEMENTAL
TWITTER FILES: SUPPLEMENTAL MORE ADAM SCHIFF BAN REQUESTS, AND "DEAMPLIFICATION"
TWITTER FILES: HOW THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY LOBBIED SOCIAL MEDIA TO SHAPE CONTENT AROUND VACCINE POLICY
RELATED: DAVE RUBIN ON SHADOWBANNING
RUBY FILES: AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE TYPE OF CONTENT TWITTER FLAGGED FOR REVIEW
https://rubymediagroup.com/twitter-artificial-intelligence/ UNDER WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE, FACEBOOK CENSORED ACCURATE COVID VACCINE INFORMATION
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/under-white-house-pressure-facebook FROM THE TWITTER FILES: PFIZER BOARD MEMBER SCOTT GOTTLIEB SECRETLY PRESSED TWITTER TO HIDE POSTS CHALLENGING HIS COMPANY'S MASSIVELY PROFITABLE COVID JABS
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/from-the-twitter-files-pfizer-board HOW THE FBI HACKED TWITTER https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/how-the-fbi-hacked-twitter-lee-smith MISSOURI AG TALKING ABOUT COLLUSION BETWEEN BIDEN WH AND SOCIAL MEDIA
DHS backed censorship program
US Political Misinfo Twitter Detection AI List
Former Twitter employee shares exclusive details with me on AI, Access to DMs, and more.
Whistleblower Report https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22186683/twitter-whistleblower-disclosure.pdf CDC Thread on secret Twitter partner portal
Feds at Facebook
Feds at Google
GLOSSARY OF “TWITTER FILES” TERMS Click To View Spoiler Government Agencies and NGOs CISA: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) CENTCOM: Central Command of the Armed Forces ODNI: Office of the Director of National Intelligence FITF: Foreign Influence Task Force, a cyber-regulatory agency comprised of members of the FBI, DHS, and ODNI “OGA”: Other Government Agency, colloquially — CIA GEC: Global Engagement Center, an analytical division of the U.S. State Department USIC: United States intelligence community HSIN: Homeland Security Information Network, a portal through which states and other official bodies can send “flagged” accounts EIP: Election Integrity Project, a cyber-laboratory based at Stanford University that sends many reports to Twitter DFR: Digital Forensic Research lab, an outlet that performs a similar function to the EIP, only is funded by the Atlantic Council IRA: Internet Research Agency, the infamous Russian “troll farm” headed by “Putin’s chef,” Yevgheny Prigozhin Twitter or Industry-specific terms PII: Can have two meanings. “Personally identifiable information” is self-explanatory, while a “Public Interest Interstitial” is a warning placed over a tweet, so that it cannot be seen. Twitter personnel even use “interstitial” as a verb, as in, “Can we interstitial that?” JIRA: Twitter’s internal ticketing system, through which complaints rise and are decided PV2: The system used at Twitter to view the profile of any user, to check easily if it has flags like “Trends Blacklist” SIP-PES Site Integrity Policy — Policy Escalation Support. SIP-PES is like Twitter’s version of a moderation Supreme Court, dealing with the most high-profile, controversial rulings SI: Site integrity. Key term that you’ll see repeately in Twitter email traffic, especially with “escalations,” i.e. tweets or content that have been reported for moderation review CHA: Coordinated Harmful Activity SRT: Strategic Response Team GET: Global Escalation Team VF: Visibility Filtering GUANO: Tool in Twitter’s internal system that keeps a chronological record of all actions taken on an account VIT: Very Important Tweeter. Really. GoV: Glorificaiton of Violence BOT: In the moderation content, an individualized heuristic attached to an account that moderates certain behavior automatically BME: Bulk Media Exploitation EP Abuse: Episodic abuse PCF: Parity, commentary and fan accounts. “PCF” sometimes appears as a reason an account has escaped an automated moderation process, under a limited exception FLC: Forced Login Challenge. Also called a “phone challenge,” it’s a way Twitter attempts to verify if an account is real or automated. “Phone challenges” are seen repeatedly in discussions about verification of suspected “Russia-linked” accounts IO: Information Operations, as in The GEC’s mandate for offensive IO to promote American interests. View Quote View Quote ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now he wants to buy it! "Since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company," Musk said in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor. View Quote https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-offers-buy-twitter-101906337.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re-filed: Elon Musk refiled the disclosure of his stake in Twitter Inc. to classify himself as an active investor, making the change after taking a seat on the social media company’s board. View Quote https://finance.yahoo.com/news/musk-refiles-twitter-disclosure-show-221958940.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tesla CEO Elon Musk is putting his enormous sums of money where his tweets are at. It was disclosed on Monday that the somewhat unpredictable Musk took a 9.2% stake in Twitter. The stake — valued at close to $3 billion as of Twitter's closing price on Friday — is defined as a passive one. View Quote While Musk's stake in Twitter is passive, it could turn on a dime, said Tesla bull and Elon watcher Dan Ives of Wedbush. "We would expect this passive stake as just the start of broader conversations with the Twitter board/management that could ultimately lead to an active stake and a potential more aggressive ownership role of Twitter," Ives said. View Quote https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-just-took-a-92-stake-in-twitter-what-may-happen-next-111313363.html
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/twitter-stock-rockets-after-elon-musk-takes-stake-valued-at-more-than-3-billion-11649070782 |
|
“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught falsehoods in school. And the person that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.”
– Plato |
Originally Posted By SmashedRollpin: I can tell you have no idea what you are talking about. You've never worked in a data center or understand how modern infrastructure works. But keep pretending. Stay in your lane. Eta: you realize arfcom is hosted on aws right? sorry but public cloud is already here and its not going anywhere. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SmashedRollpin: Originally Posted By Bassgasm: #Hybrid #Cloud At the end of the day, you still need power, cooling, compute, and network, and someone has to run all of that. The other issue here is that the big name cloud providers are all run by people hostile to Elon and what he’s doing. Google and AWS? Hard pass. I can tell you have no idea what you are talking about. You've never worked in a data center or understand how modern infrastructure works. But keep pretending. Stay in your lane. Eta: you realize arfcom is hosted on aws right? sorry but public cloud is already here and its not going anywhere. I’ve been in the data center networking space for about a decade. I cut my teeth on Catalyst 6500s and 4500s, and these days, I mostly work on Nexus 9k stuff. And yes, I’m perfectly aware that Arfcom is on AWS. That’s quite the Faustian deal. Sure, it’s cheaper, but now we’re at the mercy of hardcore left wingers. Elon Musk relying on AWS or Google Cloud is a bad idea for the same reason he bought Twitter to begin with. He might be quick with the “I’ll just make my own ____” comments, but hosting is one he should give serious consideration. |
|
"I haven't met one burnt end or rib that I haven't liked." -Andy Reid
"Sporterizing: The art of spending $700 on a $300 gun to make it worth $200." -GTwannabe |
Originally Posted By Bassgasm: It’s a classic deferred maintenance scenario. You’re not going to throw a rod because you went 5k miles past your oil change interval, but you’re not doing yourself any favors. Even if Twitter lost critical people, the systems will keep running… for a while. Did Elon’s people correctly identify and successfully retain the right people? How many holes do they have? Is it a clean environment with good documentation, or are they trying to support a soup sandwich? These are the questions. View Quote I won't be wringing my hands about it. So what? Unless you have some inside information, it's all just a swag. |
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
Originally Posted By Bassgasm: It’s a classic deferred maintenance scenario. You’re not going to throw a rod because you went 5k miles past your oil change interval, but you’re not doing yourself any favors. Even if Twitter lost critical people, the systems will keep running… for a while. Did Elon’s people correctly identify and successfully retain the right people? How many holes do they have? Is it a clean environment with good documentation, or are they trying to support a soup sandwich? These are the questions. View Quote While some others are quick to dismiss you, I'll say that not everything you've said is without merit. Now, having said that, Musk is not an idiot and has built multiple multibillion dollar companies doing some very complex things at the cutting edge of technology. He also didn't buy twitter with 44B of his own cash money. Not only is he very smart, he also knows he is accountable to others who have a stake. All that to say, I'd bet good money he knows what he is doing and if he makes some mistakes, it won't be the end of the company. In fact I believe his biggest issue will be dealing with explosive growth and even he kept all the woke leftists it still would likely have been an issue IMO (I'm speaking from a strictly technical/infrastructure aspect). |
|
|
Originally Posted By bandanabandit1: Can someone tell me what the red cape and bonnet mean? Why is this the superhero outfit for the left?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bandanabandit1: Originally Posted By RSG: lmao, copywrite? I saw he was replying to James Woods...here's how that came about
Rick S. (@CodeBleu6) November 29, 2022 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FiuQNnpXoAYor8n?format=jpg&name=small Can someone tell me what the red cape and bonnet mean? Why is this the superhero outfit for the left?? “Handmaid’s Tale”…..libtard soft porn set in a dystopian world where the Taliban, while pretending to be fundamentalist Christians, takes over the U.S. and enslaves liberal women, who for some reason are the only remaining fertile women, and hot wives them out to the Chads who now run the country. |
|
|
Originally Posted By bulldog1967: @KonamiCode https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/11/business/china-apple-airdrop-function-restricted-hnk-intl https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/6755/Screen_Shot_2022-11-29_at_2_18_42_PM-2617995.png View Quote Damn. I'll be sure to spread this around. |
|
|
Originally Posted By SBR_Slut: Very telling about female nature. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/yQOEgRw-67.gif View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SBR_Slut: Originally Posted By happycynic: Originally Posted By mnd: Fetish/LARPing outfit, near as I can tell. Forced impregnation or some similar kink. Very telling about female nature. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/yQOEgRw-67.gif Yup. If this was written by men, you’d have the ruling class men fighting wars against each other for the hand of a Filipina shop clerk because she’s one of the last fertile women on earth. And the CHAD that won her wouldn’t be sharing. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Tiberius: “Handmaid’s Tale”…..libtard soft porn set in a dystopian world where the Taliban, while pretending to be fundamentalist Christians, takes over the U.S. and enslaves liberal women, who for some reason are the only remaining fertile women, and hot wives them out to the Chads who now run the country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Tiberius: Originally Posted By bandanabandit1: Originally Posted By RSG: lmao, copywrite? I saw he was replying to James Woods...here's how that came about
Rick S. (@CodeBleu6) November 29, 2022 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FiuQNnpXoAYor8n?format=jpg&name=small Can someone tell me what the red cape and bonnet mean? Why is this the superhero outfit for the left?? “Handmaid’s Tale”…..libtard soft porn set in a dystopian world where the Taliban, while pretending to be fundamentalist Christians, takes over the U.S. and enslaves liberal women, who for some reason are the only remaining fertile women, and hot wives them out to the Chads who now run the country. Catnip for women? Sounds like Beta bucks and Alpha fucks - but I'm not going to pollute my mind by watching that drivel to confirm. @StevenH @transplanted @Skillshot |
|
|
Never watched handmaids tale.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Tiberius: “Handmaid’s Tale”…..libtard soft porn set in a dystopian world where the Taliban, while pretending to be fundamentalist Christians, takes over the U.S. and enslaves liberal women, who for some reason are the only remaining fertile women, and hot wives them out to the Chads who now run the country. View Quote So a liberal sexual fetish film that they pretend they don't like? |
|
|
Originally Posted By nophun: So a liberal sexual fetish film that they pretend they don't like? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By nophun: Originally Posted By Tiberius: “Handmaid’s Tale”…..libtard soft porn set in a dystopian world where the Taliban, while pretending to be fundamentalist Christians, takes over the U.S. and enslaves liberal women, who for some reason are the only remaining fertile women, and hot wives them out to the Chads who now run the country. So a liberal sexual fetish film that they pretend they don't like? Attached File In looking for this meme, oddly enough it brought me back to the forum. The thread about The Honkening, the Canadian trucker protest Attached File And I'm realizing I think that's what we need to do guys. Get on Twitter (which was the left wing bulletin board,) and commence the honkening part 2. Attached File Take the cultural battle to their digital Atlanta. |
|
|
Apple loves the CCP
https://reclaimthenet.org/apple-air-drop-china/ “Apple turned off a private communication tool in China just before major protests broke out” “Earlier this month, Apple restricted the use of AirDrop in China. The file-sharing tool for iOS was used by protesters to communicate freely without the risk of censorship, because the tool uses direct connections between devices, creating a local network that cannot be monitored by government internet regulators.” |
|
"You have to understand most people are not ready to be unplugged, and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, they will fight to protect it." ~Morpheus
|
Originally Posted By Bassgasm: I’ve been in the data center networking space for about a decade. I cut my teeth on Catalyst 6500s and 4500s, and these days, I mostly work on Nexus 9k stuff. And yes, I’m perfectly aware that Arfcom is on AWS. That’s quite the Faustian deal. Sure, it’s cheaper, but now we’re at the mercy of hardcore left wingers. Elon Musk relying on AWS or Google Cloud is a bad idea for the same reason he bought Twitter to begin with. He might be quick with the “I’ll just make my own ____” comments, but hosting is one he should give serious consideration. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Bassgasm: Originally Posted By SmashedRollpin: Originally Posted By Bassgasm: #Hybrid #Cloud At the end of the day, you still need power, cooling, compute, and network, and someone has to run all of that. The other issue here is that the big name cloud providers are all run by people hostile to Elon and what he’s doing. Google and AWS? Hard pass. I can tell you have no idea what you are talking about. You've never worked in a data center or understand how modern infrastructure works. But keep pretending. Stay in your lane. Eta: you realize arfcom is hosted on aws right? sorry but public cloud is already here and its not going anywhere. I’ve been in the data center networking space for about a decade. I cut my teeth on Catalyst 6500s and 4500s, and these days, I mostly work on Nexus 9k stuff. And yes, I’m perfectly aware that Arfcom is on AWS. That’s quite the Faustian deal. Sure, it’s cheaper, but now we’re at the mercy of hardcore left wingers. Elon Musk relying on AWS or Google Cloud is a bad idea for the same reason he bought Twitter to begin with. He might be quick with the “I’ll just make my own ____” comments, but hosting is one he should give serious consideration. Just sayin…cat6500 and cat4500 have been end of sale and life for well over a decade. Modern data centers need maybe 4-10 guys on-site. Like a google or Facebook DC. Start a new thread. Musk sends rockets and lands them on a fucking postage stamp. I think he understands compute and infrastructure. Twitter? That’s easy sauce. You do know that google is what they are because “I’ll just build my own”, right? AWS? I’ll just build my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1597705637340643328/Apw4hsxS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Buy it back? They used to own it. Fuck that idea. We have great government healthcare as shown by the VA. Great road conditions - thanks DOT. Amazing environment with no issues whatsoever with abuse and misuse of statutes courtesy of the EPA. The government having more power still? Yeah that's going to have to be a no from me. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1597705637340643328/Apw4hsxS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1597705637340643328/Apw4hsxS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote god damn communist |
|
Take it easy and if it's easy take it twice
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1597705637340643328/Apw4hsxS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote That's a dude |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1597705637340643328/Apw4hsxS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote |
|
"He was seeing the enormity of the smallness of the enemy who was destroying the world.[...] If this is what has beaten us, he thought, the guilt is ours." - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote Exactly. Twitter is just the latest but they go after anything that is a threat to expose them or giving people an alternative. Like when Obama was president and his administration constantly attacked Fox News and tried to act like they are some two-bit operation not in the same league as NBC or CNN. If the NYT or WAPO were a threat they'd be going after them, too. Having a majority of the news media and online platforms on their side isn't enough. Look at what they did to competing social media efforts that have popped up. They rally around taking action to ensure no one can really challenge the status quo. |
|
I'm not the one REEING, motherfucker! -FCSD2162
|
Question.
Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme’ing actually change anything or is it just fun? |
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By t75fnaco3pwzhd: I think the best route would be to throw monetary support into existing projects like GrapheneOS. With Graphene, anything already on android works just fine because it IS android. One of the big hurdles with Graphene is that no OEM phone manufacturers sell phones with Graphene installed because Google forces them all to agree to an "anti-fragmentation agreement". But Musk could make and distribute a phone with Graphene out of the box. Graphene wants to sell devices but have had multiple deals with OEMs fall through. Seems like a great opportunity for Musk. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By t75fnaco3pwzhd: Originally Posted By Ayada: Originally Posted By Geralt55: In reality he would not need to clean out Apple and Google to "win", he would only need to have enough market to sustain itself and to remove their bullying power, preventing them from dropping twitter. And if there's a person I would try to try a smartphone-startup and go after Microsoft poured in billions and couldn't get even a sliver of market share, and they sponsored the shit out of companies to make apps for their phones. The biggest challenge is not making the phone, or even the operating system. The two biggest issues are getting people to buy the thing, and getting companies to support it. I don't think he would have issues with getting an initial surge of hype purchases. What I do doubt is finding companies that are willing to port their apps to yet another ecosystem that's unproven to their eyes, especially when we see that companies will disregard profit to make a statement (i.e., pull advertising from Twitter because of feelings). I think the best route would be to throw monetary support into existing projects like GrapheneOS. With Graphene, anything already on android works just fine because it IS android. One of the big hurdles with Graphene is that no OEM phone manufacturers sell phones with Graphene installed because Google forces them all to agree to an "anti-fragmentation agreement". But Musk could make and distribute a phone with Graphene out of the box. Graphene wants to sell devices but have had multiple deals with OEMs fall through. Seems like a great opportunity for Musk. Isn't the EU in the process of outlawing that or do I not remember correctly? |
|
But he sure found out the hard way
That dreams don't always come true |
How long until Elon Musk has an accident or commits suicide?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme’ing actually change anything or is it just fun? View Quote Elon can launch his rockets anywhere he wants. They aren't going to fuck with him that bad. |
|
Take it easy and if it's easy take it twice
|
But he sure found out the hard way
That dreams don't always come true |
Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? View Quote I think social media played a huge role in 2016 in electing Trump which is why FB and others were so quick to shut that down for 2020. They spent a lot of time banning the most influential accounts. People known for producing memes were banned. They also used control over social media to silence dissent around the COVID response by using the excuse of public safety and science. People self-censor when they fear getting banned or their posts labeled as misinformation. This creates a false consensus bias when instead of seeing posts with angry people about COVID rules and lockdowns there is an onslaught of government propaganda being thrown in your face. Time will tell how successful Elon can be with Twitter but I am pretty hopeful about the direction he's going so far. |
|
I'm not the one REEING, motherfucker! -FCSD2162
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By midcap: Elon can launch his rockets anywhere he wants. They aren't going to fuck with him that bad. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By midcap: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? Elon can launch his rockets anywhere he wants. They aren't going to fuck with him that bad. |
|
|
Originally Posted By DragoMuseveni: Plus Starlink will be able to track any cellphone anywhere on the planet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By DragoMuseveni: Originally Posted By midcap: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? Elon can launch his rockets anywhere he wants. They aren't going to fuck with him that bad. yep and you think Elon can't get ahold of Pegasus 2.0? |
|
Take it easy and if it's easy take it twice
|
Pemberton the carbonated, behind his tasty bubbles, whispering of the love that is more horrible than hate.
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce: It ends with Elon dropping asteroids on us. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RustedAce: Originally Posted By midcap: Elon can launch his rockets anywhere he wants. They aren't going to fuck with him that bad. It ends with Elon dropping asteroids on us. yeah no shit. |
|
Take it easy and if it's easy take it twice
|
Originally Posted By Rebel31: I think social media played a huge role in 2016 in electing Trump which is why FB and others were so quick to shut that down for 2020. They spent a lot of time banning the most influential accounts. People known for producing memes were banned. They also used control over social media to silence dissent around the COVID response by using the excuse of public safety and science. People self-censor when they fear getting banned or their posts labeled as misinformation. This creates a false consensus bias when instead of seeing posts with angry people about COVID rules and lockdowns there is an onslaught of government propaganda being thrown in your face. Time will tell how successful Elon can be with Twitter but I am pretty hopeful about the direction he's going so far. View Quote I follow you. I get it. But don’t you think if it was that important helping them win elections then they will have to shut it down? If they can’t control it won’t they lose? They can’t have that. |
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme’ing actually change anything or is it just fun? View Quote He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. |
|
|
Pemberton the carbonated, behind his tasty bubbles, whispering of the love that is more horrible than hate.
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. View Quote Man I hope you are right. But will the machine just stand down? They have never surrendered before. Will they this time? Why would they? |
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. I don't want to see them silenced the same way our side was but the people who were banned were influential enough to combat them. A big part of the reason Twitter became their 'home turf' is that opposing voices were silenced so the place became an echo chamber. Getting the right-wing influential people back on the platform also has the effect of getting more regular users on our side back on there which is another thing that helps combat their influence. |
|
I'm not the one REEING, motherfucker! -FCSD2162
|
Originally Posted By Bassgasm: It's a classic deferred maintenance scenario. You're not going to throw a rod because you went 5k miles past your oil change interval, but you're not doing yourself any favors. Even if Twitter lost critical people, the systems will keep running for a while. Did Elon's people correctly identify and successfully retain the right people? How many holes do they have? Is it a clean environment with good documentation, or are they trying to support a soup sandwich? These are the questions. View Quote |
|
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.
Thomas Jefferson "He didnt punch anybody. He punched an idea." DrFrige |
Originally Posted By PJF: My God................. Without payroll and finance Twitter will surely just vanish, they are probably hitting the OFF switches right now. If only there were people that knew how to do those tasks that Elon could hire to replace those that left. I guess he better just close the doors. View Quote thank you for giving me a good laugh from that bullshit that gets posted.. half these people dont know how to run anything.. twitter is literally some servers.. internet and some moderation.. its not a HUGE science and rocket technology department. if any person here seriously thinks twitter cant be mostly run with the team shown in the pictures, they need to have their head examined.. its NOT ROCKET SURGERY! |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By pdb5906: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/76938/2022-11-29_20_09_25-Latest_Tweets___Twit-2618436.JPG View Quote Muskholio. “Are you threatening me?” All the tech giants, and numb nuts “Elon is so dumb! What an idiot! That will never work” Elon - I put my mutha fuckin car into space on the mutha fucking reusable rocket that lands in a mutha fucking boat in the middle of the ocean that also delivers my mutha fucking comm satellites that look like a choo choo train in the sky You think this is a mutha fuckin 44 billion dollar game? It hasn’t even been 5 weeks. |
|
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: Man I hope you are right. But will the machine just stand down? They have never surrendered before. Will they this time? Why would they? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By GutWrench: Originally Posted By Geralt55: He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. Man I hope you are right. But will the machine just stand down? They have never surrendered before. Will they this time? Why would they? They sure as hell won't But I honestly think they don't know what to do. They don't know what comes next. There's that thing about "always fighting the last war". - To beat the GOPe they needed only to shame them enough. (Musk has aspergers and is the world's richest man) - To beat a Business that wasn't down with ESG, threaten the stock. (Elon wants to take Twitter private right?) - To beat a Trump, they would wait until he has a verbal interception - and whoooosh "akshulllllly You Have To Admit He Steps In ItTM" says your Karen-neighbor who has no comment on Fetterman or Hank "Guam-Tipper" Johnson. Musk doesn't have those flaws. They don't have gamefilm on what to do. They've always had some other excuse they craft, then push on twitter, which filters into the media, (and fast!) into public outrage, to get their footsoldiers into action. He took the megaphone. They haven't REALLY had to play defense before on a counter trend pointed at them, then sustained and grown via social media - not in a looong time. I hope we see: - What the .gov asked them to censor, and who, and when - What trends they pushed on us - What trends they blocked What's weird is, it would "confirm" things for us, it would be revealing to the left that Santa isn't real (demoralizing effect, if you press on the wound), and enlightening for the normies. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Rebel31: I don't want to see them silenced the same way our side was but the people who were banned were influential enough to combat them. A big part of the reason Twitter became their 'home turf' is that opposing voices were silenced so the place became an echo chamber. Getting the right-wing influential people back on the platform also has the effect of getting more regular users on our side back on there which is another thing that helps combat their influence. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Rebel31: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. I don't want to see them silenced the same way our side was but the people who were banned were influential enough to combat them. A big part of the reason Twitter became their 'home turf' is that opposing voices were silenced so the place became an echo chamber. Getting the right-wing influential people back on the platform also has the effect of getting more regular users on our side back on there which is another thing that helps combat their influence. Absolutely. Know who should be banned? Antifa accounts, ISIS accounts, and the people posting the content that twitter couldn't do annnything about, until Suddenly a week after Elon bought it, it was gone. The leftie-nobody bluecheckmarks should not be banned. Their speech should be heard, and arguments challenged. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Absolutely. Know who should be banned? Antifa accounts, ISIS accounts, and the people posting the content that twitter couldn't do annnything about, until Suddenly a week after Elon bought it, it was gone. The leftie-nobody bluecheckmarks should not be banned. Their speech should be heard, and arguments challenged. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By Rebel31: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Question. Do you guys predict Elon winning this in the end or will the world governments and corporations smash him down? If Musk does win. Will it actually do anything to reverse the damage already done? Will all of us meme'ing actually change anything or is it just fun? He captured the factory where much of their psyops were assembled and pushed out to the media shipping lanes. Their supply lines have been halved at minimum. Their ability to craft talking points, push it out fast and shame their neighbors into compliance has been slowed down dramatically. This is also "their home base", their BIG spot on the internet where every leftie tells the story about how their 7 month old asked them, "Mother, why didst Justice Thomas write that awful Supreme Court opinion?" It's home turf. This is demoralizing, the potential is that their power (culturally) is dramatically diminished. I expect them to fight, but if Twitter can succeed, and advertisers return? The WEF and frens have to use more capital (and look more fascist, risking red-pilling more normies) to push back on it. A prediction? The cultural pendulum stopped moving and is now swinging the other way. We are watching it right now. I don't want to see them silenced the same way our side was but the people who were banned were influential enough to combat them. A big part of the reason Twitter became their 'home turf' is that opposing voices were silenced so the place became an echo chamber. Getting the right-wing influential people back on the platform also has the effect of getting more regular users on our side back on there which is another thing that helps combat their influence. Absolutely. Know who should be banned? Antifa accounts, ISIS accounts, and the people posting the content that twitter couldn't do annnything about, until Suddenly a week after Elon bought it, it was gone. The leftie-nobody bluecheckmarks should not be banned. Their speech should be heard, and arguments challenged. Antifa type accounts liked to doxx people but rarely got banned for it despite being against the rules. The old Twitter would stretch the rules to ban right-wingers or not even both giving an explanation. I actually prefer a pretty limited set of rules and believe the best disinfectant is shining a light on the worst parts of society or the world at large. |
|
I'm not the one REEING, motherfucker! -FCSD2162
|
¯\_(?)_/¯
|
Originally Posted By spidey07: Muskholio. "Are you threatening me?" All the tech giants, and numb nuts "Elon is so dumb! What an idiot! That will never work" Elon - I put my mutha fuckin car into space on the mutha fucking reusable rocket that lands in a mutha fucking boat in the middle of the ocean that also delivers my mutha fucking comm satellites that look like a choo choo train in the sky You think this is a mutha fuckin 44 billion dollar game? It hasn't even been 5 weeks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By spidey07: Originally Posted By pdb5906: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/76938/2022-11-29_20_09_25-Latest_Tweets___Twit-2618436.JPG Muskholio. "Are you threatening me?" All the tech giants, and numb nuts "Elon is so dumb! What an idiot! That will never work" Elon - I put my mutha fuckin car into space on the mutha fucking reusable rocket that lands in a mutha fucking boat in the middle of the ocean that also delivers my mutha fucking comm satellites that look like a choo choo train in the sky You think this is a mutha fuckin 44 billion dollar game? It hasn't even been 5 weeks. |
|
The FBI delenda est!
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/A1-AFA95-B-0702-4-C76-A151-47795988741-E-2618201.JPG In looking for this meme, oddly enough it brought me back to the forum. The thread about The Honkening, the Canadian trucker protest https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1643751622488_jpg-2618203.JPG And I'm realizing I think that's what we need to do guys. Get on Twitter (which was the left wing bulletin board,) and commence the honkening part 2. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/quote-you-might-as-well-appeal-against-t-2618204.JPG Take the cultural battle to their digital Atlanta. View Quote Lol |
|
The banning or confiscation of weapons is a denial of the nature of Man, a pathetic attempt to avert the violence innate to Mankind, an insult to the Sacred Creed of the Murdercube.
|
So because of this thread I signed up at Twitter.
Should I tweet what I am having for dinner, my odometer, or the amount of snow outside on the sidewalk? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: They sure as hell won't But I honestly think they don't know what to do. They don't know what comes next. There's that thing about "always fighting the last war". - To beat the GOPe they needed only to shame them enough. (Musk has aspergers and is the world's richest man) - To beat a Business that wasn't down with ESG, threaten the stock. (Elon wants to take Twitter private right?) - To beat a Trump, they would wait until he has a verbal interception - and whoooosh "akshulllllly You Have To Admit He Steps In ItTM" says your Karen-neighbor who has no comment on Fetterman or Hank "Guam-Tipper" Johnson. Musk doesn't have those flaws. They don't have gamefilm on what to do. They've always had some other excuse they craft, then push on twitter, which filters into the media, (and fast!) into public outrage, to get their footsoldiers into action. He took the megaphone. They haven't REALLY had to play defense before on a counter trend pointed at them, then sustained and grown via social media - not in a looong time. I hope we see: - What the .gov asked them to censor, and who, and when - What trends they pushed on us - What trends they blocked What's weird is, it would "confirm" things for us, it would be revealing to the left that Santa isn't real (demoralizing effect, if you press on the wound), and enlightening for the normies. View Quote You’re right. It is unexplored territory for them. It’s going to be fun to watch no matter what happens. |
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By AK-12: Lol https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/509384/162B764D-8A6A-46DD-A45F-3A056F55F619_jpe-2618470.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/509384/E54-B1938-0-DEC-4330-97-EE-C91-C7-F6-AF8-2618481.png View Quote Another good one from the Freedom Convoy / Convoi de la Liberté. |
|
KF7WNX If you want a picture of the future, imagine Clownshoes stomping on a human face—for ever.
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.