Sorry if this was already posted. Guess Clinton thought Bill Gates was a more dangerous threat:

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured
1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military
personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and
punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and
injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible
would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and
injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 3 U.S.
sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and
punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people would be
alive today.

An interesting question: This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in
show.

Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question.

There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap
software and gives hundreds of millions of dollars to charity. The other
sponsors terrorism.

That being the case, why is it that the US government has spent more money
chasing down Bill Gates over the past ten years than Osama bin Laden?

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming
memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir.

This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall
anything about past events!

It was an excuse to get somthing new in court
other than Bill bangin' the interns.....

Also, Gates was an easy target to find, and an easy target to prosecute.

The real terrorists are a bitch to find and very costly.

Klinton could "talk the talk"