[url]http://www.rkba.org/research/fackler/wrong.html[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/wound.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.icomm.ca/survival/medic90.don/30-medic.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/hwfe.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/afte.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.iwba.com/[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/wbr.htm[/url]
[url]http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/Jan98/0626.html[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/hwfe.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.medmedia.com/a9/27.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.defencejournal.com/april98/bulletwound.htm[/url]
[url]http://falcon.usask.ca/cdn-firearms/Fackler/wrong.html[/url]
[url]http://www.soton.ac.uk/~jb3/bullet/gsw.html[/url]
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/images/Wound%20Profiles/M193.jpg[/url](img)
[url]http://www.firearmstactical.com/images/Wound%20Profiles/M855.jpg[/url](img)

Gota love Fackler's observation (First link);

"...with the advent of the high-speed movie camera in the present century, emphasis in wound ballistics shifted from sound scientific method to spectacular cinematography--a triumph of high technology over common sense."

Less wound related (pure ballistics);
[url]http://www.povn.com/~4n6/index.htm[/url]

Advanced fluid dynamics parameters (Seems unrelated at first, but it's very relevant);
[url]http://www.cis.syr.edu/mame/simfluid/redder/intro.html[/url]