etc. so that the people of these countries can overthrow their corrupt governments.
Why aren't they distributing low capacity hunting weapons like those allowed after Feinstein's proposed bill?
Posted: 12/28/2012 5:45:25 AM EDT
[#1]
An inconsistent conceptualization of tyranny. Some tyrannies are more righteous than others.
Posted: 12/28/2012 5:49:17 AM EDT
[#2]
The US is a major arms maker and exporter. We are not going to cede that business to other countries.
We are a warring nation and one of our products is arms. We make extras to achieve an economy of scale and to create wealth. The hugs for rainbows and skittles crowd needs to get with the program by understanding that fact.
Posted: 12/28/2012 5:55:02 AM EDT
[#3]
Because a tyrannical government could never happen here
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:00:38 AM EDT
[#4]
It's simple. American citizens can't be trusted with firearms and the Libyans and other Arab extremists flocking in for the fight in Libya can be.
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:03:19 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: Because a tyrannical government could never happen here
Not until we are disarmed.
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:07:00 AM EDT
[#6]
You forgot the cartels.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:08:45 AM EDT
[#7]
Obama wants them to go and shoot up their schools and shopping malls. Obama hates brown people.
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:19:18 AM EDT
[#8]
What types of weapons did Stalin give his people? What weapons did he give the rest of the world?
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:28:47 AM EDT
[#9]
NIMBY like many of Uncle Sam's policies.
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:51:28 AM EDT
[#10]
except in those situations, they are actually real, fully automatic, assault rifles and not civilian lookalikes
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:52:42 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
etc. so that the people of these countries can overthrow their corrupt governments.
Why aren't they distributing low capacity hunting weapons like those allowed after Feinstein's proposed bill?
Because the people in our government don't want an armed US populace that could start a similar event here.