User Panel
Posted: 6/14/2016 10:53:26 AM EDT
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers.
|
|
I think most of us are operating under the assumption someday there WILL be a ban. Buy your replacement stuff now, especially the cheap, small stuff like springs, détente pins, etc.
|
|
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now?
|
|
|
Quoted:
I think most of us are operating under the assumption someday there WILL be a ban. Buy your replacement stuff now, especially the cheap, small stuff like springs, détente pins, etc. View Quote Agreed.. Too be honest, now is the time to grab lowers and mags, if you don't have extra. They will be the first items on a bill. I cant see them banning springs etc, however I may be wrong. |
|
Quoted:
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. View Quote Come heavy or don't come at all, Mr. Government Agent... |
|
Quoted:
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. View Quote No way, they have been long stating that the next ban will have more feature sets, will have name bans, and will include components such as parts kits, barrels, etc. |
|
Quoted:
There's no way they can execute a confiscation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. They don't have to. Pass the law and bide their time. Time.......is on their side. |
|
Quoted:
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. View Quote NO. heres the proposed ban as of 2015. already written up, ready to go. it bans ALL parts, of ANY gun listed, barrels, springs, bcg's, bolts, etc. also, bans guns, magazines, and spare parts. it also bans new lower receivers. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4269/text
“(L) Any combination of parts from which a firearm described in subparagraphs (A) through (K) can be assembled. “(M) The frame or receiver of a rifle or shotgun described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (F), (G), (H), (J), or (K). View Quote |
|
I think it will be written in a way that changes the language to include all parts.
On the other hand, if they ban lowers only, the price of all other parts will double at least. You have to decide if what u have now is adequate, or are you willing to wait and see with the hope that prices or availability doesn't change dramatically. |
|
Dont know really. I'd guess the neckbeard prices on things would do more to restrict availability than the law. Assuming the law is restricting sales to the public of complete guns.
|
|
The only way it could be effective is if they do the following:
-Make an "approved" rifle list like how cali does their handguns -Require serialization of parts on barrels, bcgs, etc and require them to be fixed to the gun. Any by-name bans or feature bans would only make companies change their names and aesthetics. Even with the above, it would take half a century for the existing rifles to bite the dust. |
|
You don't seem to understand, OP.
The AWB v 2.0 that Hillary envisions is not going to be like the last ban, which "grandfathered" pre ban ARs already privately owned. Think "registration of what you already own, or felony charges if caught not complying" this time, leading in the end to ultimate confiscation of course. THAT'S the direction Hillary wants to take the bus this time. |
|
|
Quoted:
They don't have to. Pass the law and bide their time. Time.......is on their side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. They don't have to. Pass the law and bide their time. Time.......is on their side. This is why those with kids, It's a good idea to pass down before a ban (if one happens). My daughters love to shoot so, their uncle and I built them both a rifle. Along with their own mags etc. |
|
Quoted: I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The only way it could be effective is if they do the following: -Make an "approved" rifle list like how cali does their handguns -Require serialization of parts on barrels, bcgs, etc and require them to be fixed to the gun. Any by-name bans or feature bans would only make companies change their names and aesthetics. Even with the above, it would take half a century for the existing rifles to bite the dust. View Quote the new ban, as I listed above, says.... " ar-15, and ALL COPIES OF THE AR-15..... so, there will be no dropping of features to work around it. also.. don't forget. the LAST ban done by bill Clinton, banned new manufactured magazines... BUT they made so damn many up to the deadline.. they were STILL selling new mags 10 years later.. if they DID try this. gun manufacturers would produce as damn much product, guns, parts kits, magazines, spare parts, etc as possible... you would still see niw parts 20 years later being sold.... unless they got really smart and banned all sales of parts after xx date... unless for authorized repairs by the manufacturer etc. |
|
One more recommendation, I would invest in a .22 conversion bolt CMMG or a dedicated .22 upper.
|
|
Yeah, well, they banned drugs, too.
How's that working out for them? |
|
laws create innovation. They know that. A ban will simply create an ar15 type rifle that can be assembled using parts from Lowe's or Home Depot. Barrels will be "solvent trap guide pipes" which have "spiral-grooved insides to help funnel dirt down to the trap."
|
|
Quoted:
There's no way they can execute a confiscation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. Nope but they can make it to where if you own one you are a felon. |
|
If the AR-15 is banned, there are going to be a lot of newly converted M4's.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Nope but they can make it to where if you own one you are a felon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. Nope but they can make it to where if you own one you are a felon. Yep. Then they just need to sit back and let nature take its course, as neighbors drop dimes on neighbors, loose lips start sinking ships, and they make an example out of some poor otherwise law abiding shmuck or two, to add some more "chill" to the waters. They gradually get what they want, as more and more current owners realize they really DON'T want to go to prison after all. |
|
The reality is if a ban goes into effect, Unfortunatly radicals and nut jobs will switch tactics and start suicide bombing, much like in Belgium. There is no answer to stop determined wackos that want to kill and terrorize. More lives were lost in one day, due to radicals with box cutters, than all the top 25 mass shootings combined and that makes only 20% lost on 9-11
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah, well, they banned drugs, too. How's that working out for them? View Quote They don't care. Was reading mother jones last night. "Ban everything" was commonly used. Someone said they would prefer to be locked in a room and only be allowed to vote. Do progressives raise kids like a voting drones? I have no doubt they see their kids as a vote and nothing else. |
|
Quoted:
They don't have to. Pass the law and bide their time. Time.......is on their side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. They don't have to. Pass the law and bide their time. Time.......is on their side. It's working just fine here in ct |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, well, they banned drugs, too. How's that working out for them? View Quote Well,you can become a felon if you get caught with them. And drugs would be just a tad easier to use around your home with no one knowing (compared to whipping out the AR). NY is a fine example-100 years of the Sullivan Law (cannot possess a handgun without a permit-period),and now the SAFE ACT.Sure,you can have all the "high capacity mags" and "assault weapons" you want-just don't get caught. Did anyones Granddad leave them an unregistered Thompson?Can you take it out and shoot it? Any restriction they can pass is a win for them in the long run. |
|
|
Quoted:
The reality is if a ban goes into effect, Unfortunatly radicals and nut jobs will switch tactics and start suicide bombing, much like in Belgium. There is no answer to stop determined wackos that want to kill and terrorize. More lives were lost in one day, due to radicals with box cutters, than all the top 10 mass shootings... Combined. View Quote They have already admitted to wanting that. You bring this point up, their response is: "That's fine, as long as it gets rid of these Weapons of WAR(TM)!" |
|
80 percent lower, and what ever upper I choose.
They dont/can't enforce the NFA today, they don't have the manpower , enforcement of new ban on AR's is fantasy land. It will be filed in the same drawer as my dog license application. |
|
Gun confiscations? Don't know about the rest of the country but in Montana, not many LEO'S are gunna be knocking on doors taking guns. There will be a shootout at every house.
|
|
Quoted:
Gun confiscations? Don't know about the rest of the country but in Montana, not many LEO'S are gunna be knocking on doors taking guns. There will be a shootout at every house. View Quote Do some intel on the current emotional instability of liberals and tell me they wont try. They would line up to be the first in line to take your guns. No doubt this will turn into a confederate flag issue and protected vigilant progressives will be rushing or attacking you. |
|
Quoted:
The reality is if a ban goes into effect, Unfortunatly radicals and nut jobs will switch tactics and start suicide bombing, much like in Belgium. There is no answer to stop determined wackos that want to kill and terrorize. More lives were lost in one day, due to radicals with box cutters, than all the top 25 mass shootings combined and that makes only 20% lost on 9-11 View Quote They'll just smuggle guns into the country. |
|
I see more of a CA style restriction on "assault rifles" and possibly registration.
|
|
Quoted:
Big differences. A gun ban is directed at law abiding, working men and women. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah, well, they banned drugs, too. How's that working out for them? Big differences. A gun ban is directed at law abiding, working men and women. No, there's no difference. When drugs were legal, they were used by law abiding, working men and women. Besides, you completely miss the point of my post. There is a huge underground market for the production and sale of drugs. You can buy drugs in prison, every single person on this website could go out and buy rugs today if they so desired. Everybody on this site knows someone that uses an illegal drug whether they know it or not. People make/grow drugs in their homes, people sell drugs on the street corners in this country, etc. so and so forth. |
|
|
Quoted:
There's no way they can execute a confiscation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. The attempted ban in MN had a clause where, upon your death, your evil icky black guns had to be turned over by your estate. In 1.5-2 generations, zero evil icky black guns and/or a ton of felons in possession of evil icky black guns. It was one of the provisions that killed it here. Even our (D) legislators (well, the guys outside the Twin Shitholes) hated the idea of not being able to hand their guns down to the next generation. |
|
While they are at it, they should ban cocaine, heroin, meth, etc.
And a total ban on alcohol production should solve most other problems, too. Oh, wait a min....... |
|
|
I sure as hell don't trust the fucktards in congress, especially Ryan, the turtle and all the other rinos to do what is right and proper. AFAIC most of those lying, corrupt pieces of shit traitors will sell the country, the Constitution and all of us out. If you don't think so then you need to take off you rose colored glasses.
Crooked cunt, Warren, Reid, Pelosi and all the rest of the libtard pukes should all be prosecuted for violating their oaths of office poste haste. The socialists and communists and all other freaks are destroying this country and by the very act of ignoring this by politicians is TREASON. |
|
I have asked many a politician similar questions, but never received an answer.
My favorite is: Do you support a ban on AR15 type rifles. If so, what do you propose that should be done about the existing supply already in the hands of Americans. Do you support a total ban to include confiscation even if that means a house to house search/seizure? |
|
Quoted:
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. View Quote They won't take the house, and if the RhinoTards cave on that, I see lynchings in their future. |
|
Quoted:
There's no way they can execute a confiscation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. Yup. They will ban sales of spare parts, whole rifles and mags after a certain date. |
|
Ban them and some enterprising GD'er will set up a factory in Mexico.
Every other illegal coming across will be smuggling AR parts, while the others still smuggle the drugs. |
|
Quoted:
NO. heres the proposed ban as of 2015. already written up, ready to go. it bans ALL parts, of ANY gun listed, barrels, springs, bcg's, bolts, etc. also, bans guns, magazines, and spare parts. it also bans new lower receivers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I can not imagine this actually happening. However, seems like DemocraPs among others are backing the Hildabeast in the masses. If she were to get elected and somehow manage a "assault weapons ban", would we still be able to get replacement parts,ie gas rings, bolts, triggers. NO. heres the proposed ban as of 2015. already written up, ready to go. it bans ALL parts, of ANY gun listed, barrels, springs, bcg's, bolts, etc. also, bans guns, magazines, and spare parts. it also bans new lower receivers. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4269/text
“(L) Any combination of parts from which a firearm described in subparagraphs (A) through (K) can be assembled. “(M) The frame or receiver of a rifle or shotgun described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (F), (G), (H), (J), or (K). This is how I think it will happen. |
|
Quoted:
Nope but they can make it to where if you own one you are a felon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What will the ban look like? Will it be nothing new is allowed, or hand over what you have now? There's no way they can execute a confiscation. Nope but they can make it to where if you own one you are a felon. Might as well go for broke at that point and drill the extra hole. |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.