Yes. Dedicated and interchangeable lens camera sales have been declining as smartphone sales have increased (see
CIPA). It used to be that anybody wanting a camera for snapshots had to buy a dedicated camera (even if it was a [relatively] pocket-sized 110 format), but now they reach in their pocket and pull out the ubiquitous smartphone camera. It's more than adequate for this type of consumer.
Yet, despite gimmicks like the movies shot entirely with an iPhone, the laws of physics cannot be short-circuited and a certain level of quality requires a "real" (i.e., dedicated) camera. Tiny sensors like those in smartphones are simply incapable of performing at the level of larger sensors (and concomitant larger lenses). Those interested in expanding their interest in photography eventually realize that fact and move into non-smartphone cameras (i.e., "real" cameras). My interpretation of CIPA data is the last couple years of "real" camera sales (regardless whether DSLR or mirrorless bodies) shows signs of leveling off at the point where folks that used to buy cameras for snapshots are now filtered out of the equation. That leaves the professional and enthusiast market as the buyers of these models.
IMO, the smartphone is introducing a growing friction between traditional camera makers (e.g., Canon, Nikon, Fujifilm, Sony, etc.) with their established base of users accustomed to "old school" knobs and dials and a new generation of users that grew up with cameras with "soft" controls displayed on a very large control screen that also served as the viewfinder. We're seeing trends like tilt- and even swivel screens that enable the continuation of the selfie and touch screens with controls that are increasingly similar to those found on smartphones, but there's still a heavy reliance on menu-driven option settings.
And I doubt we'll see the shutter button disappear from dedicated camera bodies.