Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/3/2014 11:36:23 AM EDT
Going to a baseball game tonight.  Anybody know about the legality of CCW at Fluor Field?  TIA.  
7/3/2014 12:47:14 PM EDT
[#1]
Near as I remember it is posted no concealable weapons, I was there about 2 months ago.  I presumed that was because they sell alcohol at the concession stands, but with the new law change I am not sure.

I know that doesn't help you any, but I tried.
7/3/2014 6:21:28 PM EDT
[#2]
Yeah, it's still "posted", but what I saw is just a vague outline of a handgun in the circleslash.  Not what I remember to be "legal" signage.  I know concealed means concealed and all, but, what if, say, they're wanding random people at the gate and they picked you?  Would you be asked to leave, or arrested?  
 
7/4/2014 10:42:47 AM EDT
[#3]
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding.  New ruling from SLED.
7/4/2014 11:06:49 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding.  New ruling from SLED.
View Quote


SLED doesn't make laws....
7/5/2014 3:37:00 AM EDT
[#5]
Don't do it. Place covered up with police. You may beat it in court after much money spent and court appearances - if that is what you want, keep us posted!
7/5/2014 3:52:03 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:


SLED doesn't make laws....
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding.  New ruling from SLED.


SLED doesn't make laws....


Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html
7/5/2014 5:22:56 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:


Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding.  New ruling from SLED.


SLED doesn't make laws....


Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html


Where does the local PD and DA stand on the law(s).  If they are loose on their interpretations, you might be good to go.  If they are tight and/or politicians looking for election fodder, you could get screwed
7/9/2014 11:33:36 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:


Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding.  New ruling from SLED.


SLED doesn't make laws....


Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html


I was misinformed, thanks for the clarification.  Not a cwp instructor so it was second hand knowledge.