Quoted: What are the legal methods to load a centerfire rifle in the UK? My understanding is that while bolt actions are acceptable, semi-autos are not.
Would it be legal to utilize another gas system to cycle the action?
For example, take a UK legal AR. Design a dual wall free float tube that can serve as a pressure vessel. Add a trigger valve as part of a vertical grip with a safety interlock tied to the normal trigger. The outlet of the pressure vessel would be the carrier key. Port pressure of an AR is some 15 kpsi, I sure the pressure is much less at the carrier. A charged pressure vessel should be sufficient for several mags.
The firing sequence would be something like: Charge the pressure vessel and rifle. Fire a shot. Release the normal trigger. Squeeze the trigger on the foregrip to charge the rifle. Fire again.
Technically, the rifle would not be a semi-suto because another physical action has to be accomplished to charge the rifle. Your free-float tube might be a little larger in diameter and a little heavier because of the dual function.
With the machinist types and air gun shooters in the UK, I think someone could develop a system like this.
Just an idea
SRM
|
SRM,
One of gunsmiths and AR producers here in the UK was working on exactly that principle, biased more towards the unloading action being the 'semi-auto' option.
Not sure what happened to it, but the BATF equivalent (The Home Office) have several ambiguous words inplace to enable them to curtail any such project if they want to.
They use phases like 'should not be readily convertable to semi or fully automatic fire'
A statement like that you can only fight in court, and shooters here just don't have the numbers or money to fight such a court case.
In addition the National governing bodies here in the UK are very detatched from any 'overt' political action unlike your USA NRA. They tend to fight in a 'covert' holding stance to keep any more restrictions being imposed.