Posted: 5/24/2006 12:41:20 PM EDT
|
When I got my renewal, I remember signing an form stating I still maintained the proficiency required to pass the original training class I attended to get my first license. This is in Allegan county My buddy went for his renewal last week (Bay County) and they told him he needs to present evidence of another training class. Anyone know why there seems to be a difference? |
|
The law requires that applicants review their CPL training for three hours, practice for one hour at the range, and certify that they have done so. Certification, in most cases, means checking a box on the renewal form. Some jurisdictions interpret this to mean you must present a 'certificate'. Here's the pertinant section from the MCL:
MCL28.425l That said, it is a very good idea to maintain proficiency by taking additional, preferably more advanced, classes. All of the instructors I know offer intermediate and advanced classes that make excellent refreshers. They are also a lot more fun than the basic CPL class. |
100% correct, except that some jurisdictions may MIS-interpret this to mean you must present a 'certificate'. "The educational requirements are waived" is clearly stated and the exception also clearly states that the "the applicant shall certify....". It does not state nor imply that a 3rd party shall be involved in the certification process. This is CPL trainers mythology taken to the next level IMO. Hire a good lawyer and prove them the fools that they are. |