tong (Page 4 of 5)
|
Tong joins with 21 other AG's to file another lawsuit, this time against the Department of Education. Tong sues Dept. of Education over student loan forgiveness eligibility restrictions Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and 21 other attorneys general sued the U.S. Department of Education on Monday. The lawsuit alleges that the department of education unlawfully restricted the eligibility for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The program allows government and nonprofit employees to have their federal student loans forgiven after 10 years of service. Tong, and other attorneys general challenged a federal rule that would make certain state and local governments along with nonprofits ineligible employers for PSLF, if they were determined to have engaged in actions with substantial illegal purpose. The attorneys general allege that the federal government could essentially punish governments or organizations that participated in activities that are disfavored by the Trump administration. “Donald Trump and Linda McMahon want to impose an illegal MAGA litmus test on billions of dollars in loan forgiveness for public servants, Tong said. “Engage in protest? Loan forgiveness yanked. Care about immigrant families? No loan forgiveness for you. Believe in the promise of diversity or support LGBTQ+ kids? Yanked. These are teachers, nurses, police officers, firefighters, and others on the front lines of our communities who would have the promise of aid reversed after years of following the rules and doing the right thing. This is cruel, this is wrong, this is against the law, and we’re suing to stop it.” Tong was supported by Democratic members of the House and Senate, including Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Rep. John Larson and Rep. Rosa DeLauro In July, 11,840 Connecticut borrowers have had their loans forgiven through PSLF, according to the Connecticut Student Loan Ombudsperson and based on information provided by the U.S. Department of Education. Tong and the other attorneys general are asking the court to declare the rule unlawful and bar the Department of Education from enforcing or implementing it. |
|
Originally Posted By middletownbob: a little off topic but is tong trying to ban a particular Ruger firearm from being bought in ct following those who want to ban Glock pistols for being converted?>? ![]() CT Attorney General Targets Ruger Using HB 7042 — What Gun Owners Need to Know - LNL Podcast EP: 82 Connecticut Attorney General William Tong is officially using HB 7042 to go after Ruger, specifically over the RXM pistol and its potential to accept illegal conversion switches. This is the exact scenario we warned about when HB 7042 passed — instead of targeting criminals, the state is shifting liability onto gun manufacturers and, ultimately, you the lawful owner. In this episode, Josh breaks down: What the RXM actually is What a Glock switch/MCD really means (and why it’s already 100% illegal) How CT is now using HB 7042 to blame manufacturers for criminal behavior Why this strategy will lead to higher prices, fewer models available, and reduced access Why this is a political move, not a public safety one What this means for Ruger, Glock, Shadow Systems, Mossberg, and others And what comes next for gun owners in Connecticut This is the beginning of a bigger strategy: If they can’t ban guns outright, they’ll try to make it too risky for companies to sell them here. |
|
Dong has defeated Exxon https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/connecticut-attorney-general-tong-claims-complete-victory-vs-exxonmobil/520-1c76bcbe-a6f0-4a81-a35f-7ba4d181fba2 |
For being such an idiot - find some 'good people' to hang with, moron" Dr. Jizzjar
|
Originally Posted By Leon82: Dong has defeated Exxon https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/connecticut-attorney-general-tong-claims-complete-victory-vs-exxonmobil/520-1c76bcbe-a6f0-4a81-a35f-7ba4d181fba2 He is the personification of a weasel. |
|
Originally Posted By Leon82: Dong has defeated Exxon https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/connecticut-attorney-general-tong-claims-complete-victory-vs-exxonmobil/520-1c76bcbe-a6f0-4a81-a35f-7ba4d181fba2 LOL he's claiming "complete victory" over a routine court ruling denying Exxon's routine request to toss the case, so in other words.... the case continues and there hasn't been a final ruling yet in favor of either party. Case sounds like a virtue signal by Tong to the climate change folks using our tax dollars. These filing of dozens lawsuits, using taxpayer dollars, all over the place and usually for far left causes, along with joining in challenges filed by other far left AG's, has the feel that he's setting the stage to run for higher office. |
Tong is up to 40+ lawsuits against Trump using taxpayers dollars. One set of taxpayer dollars are being used to fight against another set of taxpayer dollars. ![]() Attorney General Tong Sues Over Trump Administration's Unlawful New $100K Fee for H-1B Visas CT has filed more than 40 lawsuits against the Trump administration. Here's a full list. In less than a year since President Donald Trump took office, Connecticut has filed or joined more than 40 lawsuits challenging Trump administration policies, often alongside other Democratic states, according to a list from Tong’s office. Total number of cases currently tracked: 546. Tracker Totals: Overall Case Status Snapshot Case Closed in Favor of Plaintiff: 0 Blocked: 48 Temporarily Blocked: 94 Blocked Pending Appeal: 29 Temporarily Blocked in Part; Temporary Block Denied in Part: 15 Temporary Block Denied: 42 Not Blocked Pending Appeal: 43 Awaiting Court Ruling: 230 Case Closed: 31 Misc: Transferred: 4 Case Closed/Dismissed in Favor of Government: 10 |
|
Van we get a lawsuit against tong boy for wasting our tax dollar? The commie just wants to grandstand. Funny how most of Connecticut was all red for Trump except for a few spots - rigged. No matter, the popular vote Trump won, so ever who won, according to Connecticut, it would have given its votes to the popular vote winner. I see the dems, lib/progs, left wing loonies losing power in Connecticut. They all act like a bunch of Rats trying to get off a sinking ship. I wonder? Is he trying to protect himself, by spending our tax dollar on all these frivolous lawsuits? Where did tong boy vacation? On an island someplace? hhhmmm, the plot thickens. |
|
Originally Posted By M4A2: Funny how most of Connecticut was all red for Trump except for a few spots - rigged. https://www.ctdata.org/blog/connecticut-2024-election-analysis ![]() ![]()
|
|
Originally Posted By M4A2: I would've sworn the last time I read the whole state was pretty much red. Look at the history of the legislative makeup by political party and one will see the Democrats have held control of the CT House and Senate since 1996. There has been a D govenor since 2011 and RINO governor's prior to that for a decade or more. https://ballotpedia.org/Connecticut_General_Assembly https://ballotpedia.org/Party_control_of_Connecticut_state_government As of December 2025 the CT House: Democratic 100 Republican 49 Other 0 Vacancies 2 Total 151 As of December 2025 the CT Senate: Democratic 25 Republican 11 Other 0 Vacancies 0 Total 36 |
|
Who else but Tong? Connecticut joining in: 19 Blue States Sue Trump Admin to Preserve Right to Perform Child Sex Changes https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/19-blue-states-sue-trump-admin-preserve-right/ |
Chris Murphy tries to prove he is dumber than William Tong, and says "hold my beer".
|
|
Originally Posted By group8: Chris Murphy tries to prove he is dumber than William Tong, and says "hold my beer".
Time will tell if once again we see our politicians on the wrong side of the 80/20 rule.
I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 @ImMeme0 🇻🇪 Message to anti-Trump crowd from a Venezuelan: “If you are so concerned about our country, pray for us instead of trying to destroy our only hope and happiness right now.” “If you ask any other Venezuelan right now, they’re going to tell you that we are happy—even if you don’t like Donald Trump, even if we don’t want Donald Trump, or whatever. We are happy.” “We are happy. We’re free. Do not try to take our happiness and our only hope after 26 years.” “I wish you never live through what we lived back in my country, ever in your life. I hope you never have to see family members dying because there is no power, no electricity, or no medicine in a hospital.” Bigchase (@Bigchasememes) January 3, 2026 |
|
Pretty much all the Dems are using the same talking points about the bad orange man. Connecticut leaders react to capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro The United States military carried out “large scale” strike inside Venezuela in the early hours of Saturday morning, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, according to President Donald Trump. Leaders in Connecticut are responding to the military action. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) shared the following statement. “If we’re starting another endless war, with no clear national security strategy or need, count me out. Maduro is a cruel criminal dictator, but President Trump has never sought approval from Congress for war as the Constitution requires – and our military deserves. We’ve seen several Administrations lead us into conflicts without objectives or timelines and with disastrous consequences. President Trump has also articulated no clear end game to prevent further chaos, violence, and bloodshed in Venezuela. The American people deserve—and Congress should demand—facts and clarity.” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called the strike the start of an “illegal war” between the U.S. and Venezuela. “President Trump thinks he is above the law. He steals from taxpayers. He thumbs his nose at the law. And now, he is starting an illegal war with Venezuela that Americans didn’t ask for and has nothing to do with our security. How does going to war in South America help regular Americans who are struggling? How does this do anything about drugs entering the U.S. when Venezuela produces no fentanyl? What is the actual security threat to the United States? And what happens next in Venezuela? He cannot answer these questions – and that’s why there was no briefing to Congress to explain this action, and no briefing scheduled. And Maduro’s illegitimate election does not give the president the power to invade without congressional approval, nor does it create a national security justification. That contention is laughable. This is about satisfying Trump’s vanity, making good on the long standing neocon grudge against Maduro, enriching Trump’s oil industry backers, and distracting voters from Epstein and rising costs.” State Senate Republican Leader Stephen Harding (R-Conn.) shared that he hopes Maduro is brought to justice, calling him an “integral culprit” in the “narcotic ring” in the United States. “President Maduro has been an integral culprit in fostering the narcotic ring in our country which has killed far too many Americans. I hope he is brought to justice and we can continue to address the substance abuse crisis that our state and country continues to face. The Chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party Ben Proto shared the following statement. “President Trump promised to stop the flow of drugs into the US that have been killing millions of Americans. Nicolas Maduro, who declared himself President, while getting about 30% of the vote in the last so called free election in Venezuela, was given multiple warnings to stop the flow of drugs from his country into America, was offered help by the Trump administration in stopping the flow, but he continued to, not only allow the flow of drugs, but condone it and profit from it. Presidents have long used their constitutional authority to intervene in other countries when those countries posed a danger to America and Americans. President Trump did just that. Unfortunately Democrats, particularly Jim Himes, Chris Murphy and Dick Blumenthal are more interested in playing politics than in protecting Americans. Nearly 1,000 Connecticut residents died from drug overdoses in 2024 and we have seen an increase in overdoses in 2025. If only Democrats cared as much about Americans as they do about a drug lord running another country who profits from the death of Americans.“ |
|
U.S. Justice Department sues Connecticut for failure to provide voter registration lists The United States Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against the state of Connecticut for failure to produce full voter registration lists upon request, the department announced Tuesday.
According to the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, accurate voter rolls are essential to ensuring that Americans’ votes are counted only once and that they are all eligible voters. The Department of Justice has sued 23 states and the District of Columbia for failure to provide voter roll data, and seeks to pursue more lawsuits. “Accurate voter rolls are the foundation of election integrity, and any state that fails to meet this basic obligation of transparency can expect to see us in court,” U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said. The lawsuits cite the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, which were designed by Congress to ensure that states have proper and effective voter registration and voter list maintenance programs, the department stated in a press release. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong released the following statement in response to the lawsuit: “We tried to work cooperatively with DOJ to understand the basis for their request for our voters’ sensitive personal information. Rather than communicating productively with us, they rushed to sue. The State of Connecticut complies with federal law, and takes its obligations under federal laws very seriously, and we will vigorously defend the state against this meritless and deeply disappointing lawsuit.” Connecticut Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas issued the following statement: “I am not surprised that Connecticut has been added to the long list of states being sued on these grounds. As Secretary of the State, my foremost responsibility is to the voters of Connecticut who entrust the state and their local election officials with sensitive data so they can participate in our representative democracy without fear that their information will be misused or exposed. As Connecticut knows, our office takes election integrity seriously, and we follow the law while making sure our elections remain accessible, secure, and transparent. That balance is essential to maintaining public trust, and it’s something I will continue to protect.” Sen. Rob Sampson and Sen. Stephen Harding issued the following statement from the Connecticut Senate GOP: “Good. Here in one-party Democrat rule Connecticut, the home of ‘Wanda from Bridgeport’, there is a refusal to enact election integrity safeguards. Nearly a year ago, Republicans urged Attorney General Bondi to investigate Bridgeport’s election and voting apparatus to determine whether these fraudulent practices are being replicated elsewhere in Connecticut. We appreciate any effort to restore public trust in our election system which has been severely undermined by the absurd scandals in Bridgeport. Those viral scandals, captured on video, have made Connecticut a national punchline” |
|
Self serving prick! https://www.facebook.com/reel/1221361326586513 |
"the tong" and his confederates continue to trick and take the citizens of connecticut as idiots telling them that turbine wind is better than dropping the price of fuel oil, natural gas below $2/gal!! tong says he never seen a lawsuit he didnt like....Trump will continue to deliver Christmas Presents to the atty general every day
|
the "chairman" is once again using tax payer funds to sue his "daddy" saying that he is occupying the state of minn...also theres a vigil for the rioter who was killed there, where were these idiots when innocent American Citizens were murdered by illegal migrants?
|
|
It would be poetic justice if those of us who have had our Constitutional Rights violated, sue Chairman Tong! Introduction: What is Section 1983? 42 United States Code, § 1983, often referred to simply as Section 1983, is a section of the federal civil rights law. Section 1983 addresses situations where an individual’s civil rights have been violated. Specifically, Section 1983 allows an individual to sue a state or local government official who has violated their constitutional rights. Section 1983 claims can involve various constitutional violations, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, due process, equal protection, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The law allows individuals to seek damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees for violations of their rights. Note: Federal civil-rights litigation is a very complex area of law. It frequently involves sovereign immunity issues that arise under the Eleventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, immunity issues are intertwined with the type of person you are suing and the type of remedy you seek. If you are considering or have questions about filing a civil rights claim, you should contact a lawyer. Read the Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
|
CT has officially become CA with shitty beaches and even shittier weather. There is no sense complaining about it any more. The barbarians have long since gotten thru the gates. The Left controls all statewide and federal offices. Demographic shifts, the rich, the colleges, and the explosion of state workers has forever changed the moderate, successful CT that we used to know. |
|
Originally Posted By Blaster3094: It would be poetic justice if those of us who have had our Constitutional Rights violated, sue Chairman Tong! Originally Posted By Blaster3094: It would be poetic justice if those of us who have had our Constitutional Rights violated, sue Chairman Tong! Introduction: What is Section 1983? 42 United States Code, § 1983, often referred to simply as Section 1983, is a section of the federal civil rights law. Section 1983 addresses situations where an individual’s civil rights have been violated. Specifically, Section 1983 allows an individual to sue a state or local government official who has violated their constitutional rights. Section 1983 claims can involve various constitutional violations, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, due process, equal protection, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The law allows individuals to seek damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees for violations of their rights. Note: Federal civil-rights litigation is a very complex area of law. It frequently involves sovereign immunity issues that arise under the Eleventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, immunity issues are intertwined with the type of person you are suing and the type of remedy you seek. If you are considering or have questions about filing a civil rights claim, you should contact a lawyer. Read the Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that would put some fear into these shitheads |
|
Tong ... Ban menthol cigarettes to protect black folks. Legalize Marijuana to empower black folks with a million dollar buy in to sell it legally. Put down those Newports and smoke weed. It's for your own good! We will protect your subsidized investment in your community by prosecuting those that sell it without the license! Meanwhile...Route 8 South and every WalMart parking lot smells like a skunk and is full of wrong way drivers that can't speak English. Winning. |
|
Originally Posted By gardenWeasel: Put down those Newports and smoke weed. It's for your own good! What's funny is that in cities like New Haven there are now dispensaries all over the place. Wouldn't be surprised if in some neighborhoods there are more dispensaries now than corner liquor stores. And yes the smell of pot smoke is prevalent everywhere in places like New Haven. Even while stopped at traffic lights you can sometimes have it waft over from other vehicles. |













a legal win in court from Patriots USA over open carry and 3 gun rule, ct needs a pro 2a win at any costs, when will this happen to slap down these unconstitutional laws and bans!