Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/14/2010 6:47:06 PM EDT
Can anyone tell me what the most recent version of the International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings which has been adopted by Virginia, and in particular what it has to say about hand rails for steps (like off of a deck)?





Thanks.

 
10/14/2010 7:23:45 PM EDT
[#1]
most building codes are local not state. check your county offices that gives out building permits.
10/14/2010 10:31:37 PM EDT
[#2]

http://www.arlingtonva.us/departments/CPHD/isd/docs/2003_Deck_detail_Alington.pdf

I know it says 2003, but it's still current. You want p. 17. It doesn't matter where in VA you are, if you follow this book your deck will pass inspection.

If you have any other questions I'll be around.
10/15/2010 4:25:00 AM EDT
[#3]
I was following the 2006 code, and the inspector dinged me because my handrail was not "free travel from top to bottom," in that I attached it with through-bolts and had turn-ins at the top and bottom to prevent snagging clothes.  He inspected while I was at work yesterday so I couldn't talk to him, and he didn't cite the pertinent section or page number or anything else in his notes.  Here is exactly what he wrote:  "gripable Hand Rail must be Free Travel from Top to Bottom can Not Have Bolt, Blocks etc Blocking Travel space for Hands" and nothing else.

ETA:  Looking at the website, my county follows the 2006 code.  I looked up the section dealing with handrails (section R-311.5.6.2) and it doesn't say anything at all about how to attach or how not to attach the handrail.  In fact, it specifically says "Handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in newel posts or safety terminals," which I'm pretty sure I covered with the turn-ins at top and bottom.
10/15/2010 6:19:51 AM EDT
[#4]
can you post a pic of the rail? can you counter sink the bolts?
10/15/2010 6:26:57 AM EDT
[#5]
I'm at work and don't have pics on this computer.  His issue doesn't seem to be with the bolt heads sticking out, it's that the bolts go through the back side of the rail into the guard rail (eta: using 2" lengths of copper pipe as stand-offs), instead of using the handrail hanger that attaches to the bottom.  Regardless, I can't find anything at all in the code that addresses this.  I think the guy has a personal preference that he's trying to force me to.
10/15/2010 7:42:46 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
most building codes are local not state. check your county offices that gives out building permits.


Virginia has a uniform statewide building code, and no county can vary from it.

Though interpretation does vary.


http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+reg+13VAC5-63-10
Part I
Construction

13VAC5-63-10. Chapter 1 Administration; Section 101 General.

A. Section 101.1 Short title. The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Part I, Construction, may be cited as the Virginia Construction Code. The term "USBC" shall mean the Virginia Construction Code unless the context in which the term is used clearly indicates it to be an abbreviation for the entire Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code or for a different part of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.

B. Section 101.2 Incorporation by reference. Chapters 2 - 35 of the 2006 International Building Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc., are adopted and incorporated by reference to be an enforceable part of the USBC. The term "IBC" means the 2006 International Building Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc. Any codes and standards referenced in the IBC are also considered to be part of the incorporation by reference, except that such codes and standards are used only to the prescribed extent of each such reference. In addition, any provisions of the appendices of the IBC specifically identified to be part of the USBC are also considered to be part of the incorporation by reference.

Note 1: The IBC references the whole family of International Codes including the following major codes:

2006 International Plumbing Code

2006 International Mechanical Code

2005 National Electrical Code

2006 International Fuel Gas Code

2006 International Energy Conservation Code

2006 International Residential Code

Note 2: The International Residential Code is applicable to the construction of detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses as set out in Section 310.

C. Section 101.3 Numbering system. A dual numbering system is used in the USBC to correlate the numbering system of the Virginia Administrative Code with the numbering system of the IBC. IBC numbering system designations are provided in the catchlines of the Virginia Administrative Code sections. Cross references between sections or chapters of the USBC use only the IBC numbering system designations. The term "chapter" is used in the context of the numbering system of the IBC and may mean a chapter in the USBC, a chapter in the IBC or a chapter in a referenced code or standard, depending on the context of the use of the term. The term "chapter" is not used to designate a chapter of the Virginia Administrative Code, unless clearly indicated.

D. Section 101.4 Arrangement of code provisions. The USBC is comprised of the combination of (i) the provisions of Chapter 1, Administration, which are established herein, (ii) Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC, which are incorporated by reference in Section 101.2, and (iii) the changes to the text of the incorporated chapters of the IBC that are specifically identified. The terminology "changes to the text of the incorporated chapters of the IBC that are specifically identified" shall also be referred to as the "state amendments to the IBC." Such state amendments to the IBC are set out using corresponding chapter and section numbers of the IBC numbering system. In addition, since Chapter 1 of the IBC is not incorporated as part of the USBC, any reference to a provision of Chapter 1 of the IBC in the provisions of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC is generally invalid. However, where the purpose of such a reference would clearly correspond to a provision of Chapter 1 established herein, then the reference may be construed to be a valid reference to such corresponding Chapter 1 provision.

E. Section 101.5 Use of terminology and notes. The term "this code," or "the code," where used in the provisions of Chapter 1, in Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC or in the state amendments to the IBC means the USBC, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term "this code" or "the code" where used in a code or standard referenced in the IBC means that code or standard, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The use of notes in Chapter 1 is to provide information only and shall not be construed as changing the meaning of any code provision. Notes in the IBC, in the codes and standards referenced in the IBC and in the state amendments to the IBC may modify the content of a related provision and shall be considered to be a valid part of the provision, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

F. Section 101.6 Order of precedence. The provisions of Chapter 1 of this code supersede any conflicting provisions of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC and any conflicting provisions of the codes and standards referenced in the IBC. In addition, the state amendments to the IBC supersede any conflicting provisions of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC and any conflicting provisions of the codes and standards referenced in the IBC. Further, the provisions of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC supersede any conflicting provisions of the codes and standards referenced in the IBC.

G. Section 101.7 Administrative provisions. The provisions of Chapter 1 establish administrative requirements, which include but are not limited to provisions relating to the scope of the code, enforcement, fees, permits, inspections and disputes. Any provisions of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC or any provisions of the codes and standards referenced in the IBC that address the same subject matter and impose differing requirements are deleted and replaced by the provisions of Chapter 1. Further, any administrative requirements contained in the state amendments to the IBC shall be given the same precedence as the provisions of Chapter 1. Notwithstanding the above, where administrative requirements of Chapters 2 - 35 of the IBC or of the codes and standards referenced in the IBC are specifically identified as valid administrative requirements in Chapter 1 of this code or in the state amendments to the IBC, then such requirements are not deleted and replaced.

Note: The purpose of this provision is to eliminate overlap, conflicts and duplication by providing a single standard for administrative, procedural and enforcement requirements of this code.

H. Section 101.8 Definitions. The definitions of terms used in this code are contained in Chapter 2 along with specific provisions addressing the use of definitions. Terms may be defined in other chapters or provisions of the code and such definitions are also valid.

Note:  The order of precedence outlined in Section 101.6 may be determinative in establishing how to apply the definitions in the IBC and in the referenced codes and standards.

Statutory Authority

§ 36-98 of the Code of Virginia.

Historical Notes

Derived from Virginia Register Volume 22, Issue 3, eff. November 16, 2005; amended, Virginia Register Volume 24, Issue 14, eff. May 1, 2008.
10/17/2010 12:37:08 PM EDT
[#7]
You've kinda lost me on the description of what you've got going...
Got any pics??
10/17/2010 1:45:28 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
I was following the 2006 code, and the inspector dinged me because my handrail was not "free travel from top to bottom," in that I attached it with through-bolts and had turn-ins at the top and bottom to prevent snagging clothes.  He inspected while I was at work yesterday so I couldn't talk to him, and he didn't cite the pertinent section or page number or anything else in his notes.  Here is exactly what he wrote:  "gripable Hand Rail must be Free Travel from Top to Bottom can Not Have Bolt, Blocks etc Blocking Travel space for Hands" and nothing else.

ETA:  Looking at the website, my county follows the 2006 code.  I looked up the section dealing with handrails (section R-311.5.6.2) and it doesn't say anything at all about how to attach or how not to attach the handrail.  In fact, it specifically says "Handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in newel posts or safety terminals," which I'm pretty sure I covered with the turn-ins at top and bottom.


If I am picturing your rail correctly, the inspector is right.
10/17/2010 3:49:44 PM EDT
[#9]
Here's a picture of it:



I talked to the inspector, and her excuse is that this line in the relevant section of the code (R311.5.6.2):



"Exceptions: #1) hand rails shall be permitted to be interrupted by a newel post at the turn..."



means that I can't attach it with through bolts.  That line is an exception to this line:



"Handrail continuity: handrails for stairways shall be continuous for the full length of the flight, from a point directly above the top riser of the flight to a point directly above the lowest riser of the flight."



My handrails are continuous, and they terminate directly above the nose of the top riser and the nose of the bottom riser with turn-ins, which return them to the guard-rail as required by this line:



"Handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in newel posts or safety terminals."



Mine look identical to those shown in the diagram in the link to Arlington's deck guidelines, which is provided as an example of how to do it correctly.  Otherwise the ends would be hanging out into space and snag coattails and t-shirts and the like.



Her interpretation is a stretch.  The code makes no mention of "free travel" of the "grip-able" anything, nor does it in any way address or advise on actual attachment of the handrail.
10/17/2010 7:50:25 PM EDT
[#10]
Yeah man, you need to be able to wrap your hand around rail and not have to remove it on your way up/down the stairs.

10/17/2010 9:31:14 PM EDT
[#11]
It is absolutely ridiculous that govt.org institute regulations like this; it is even more ridiculous that we accept that level or regulation/harrassment.
10/18/2010 1:15:38 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Yeah man, you need to be able to wrap your hand around rail and not have to remove it on your way up/down the stairs.

http://images.orgill.com/200x200/7277726.jpg


Exactly.
10/18/2010 4:13:52 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Yeah man, you need to be able to wrap your hand around rail and not have to remove it on your way up/down the stairs.

http://images.orgill.com/200x200/7277726.jpg


Code doesn't say anything along those lines.

Not that it matters, I'm not waiting on her approval to move forward with anything else.

Thanks for your help, everybody.
10/18/2010 1:21:46 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
It is absolutely ridiculous that govt.org institute regulations like this; it is even more ridiculous that we accept that level or regulation/harrassment.


Watch what you say, next they'll tell ya what grit paper you need to sand the handrail to so that people don't get splinters in their hand and fall down the stairs -or- Safety nets around all decks over 7' tall.

Actually, most of the time, the building code works to homeowners advantage. The problem is when our government gets it's hands in on anything, it spins out of control. If the county inspects something and deems it safe, they leave themselves somewhat vulnerable to the kind of people that don't know that coffee is hot. The government is as ridicules, in many cases, as the people that need to be governed by it.

10/18/2010 9:48:55 PM EDT
[#15]
IIRC, Virginia adopts the IFC/IBC, but adopts the past version. They are published every 3 years, so the current one SHOULD be the 2006 version.

There are always Virginia specific additions made, and so you can't necessarily go strictly by the IBC/IFC.