|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Idaho's "weakest govt. influence" is a bad thing? I see the tards came up with that one. No doubt. Idaho told the feds to FOAD, they weren't managing the wolves for them anymore. They're GTG in my book. It's not about how much the fed influence the state, but how much clout Idaho has in Congress. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Idaho's "weakest govt. influence" is a bad thing? I see the tards came up with that one. No doubt. Idaho told the feds to FOAD, they weren't managing the wolves for them anymore. They're GTG in my book. It's not about how much the fed influence the state, but how much clout Idaho has in Congress. We're both correct! 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Idaho's "weakest govt. influence" is a bad thing? I see the tards came up with that one. No doubt. Idaho told the feds to FOAD, they weren't managing the wolves for them anymore. They're GTG in my book. It's not about how much the fed influence the state, but how much clout Idaho has in Congress. We're both correct!
Two names... Larry Craig |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Idaho's "weakest govt. influence" is a bad thing? I see the tards came up with that one. No doubt. Idaho told the feds to FOAD, they weren't managing the wolves for them anymore. They're GTG in my book. It's not about how much the fed influence the state, but how much clout Idaho has in Congress. We're both correct!
Good point! Neither should really all that much control over the other. Each state is supposed to have equal control over the nation, and the feds are supposed to have equal, and WEAK control over the states. |