Posted: 6/17/2013 5:24:57 PM EDT
| Overturns AZ requirement to provide proof of citizenship in order to VOTE.... |
|
Some report this thing might be a technicality, but the lamestream news reports this as tho the Supreme's have ruled that State Laws cannot be stricter than Federal Laws.... lets run with that!
How about tomorrow 9AM, NRA files a lawsuit against every single state and local government that has gun laws stricter than federal law! And uses this ruling as precedent! Just a thought. Poole |
|
Quoted:
Some report this thing might be a technicality, but the lamestream news reports this as tho the Supreme's have ruled that State Laws cannot be stricter than Federal Laws.... lets run with that! How about tomorrow 9AM, NRA files a lawsuit against every single state and local government that has gun laws stricter than federal law! And uses this ruling as precedent! Just a thought. Poole Precisely my thought when I read the reasoning behind it. |
|
Quoted:
Some report this thing might be a technicality, but the lamestream news reports this as tho the Supreme's have ruled that State Laws cannot be stricter than Federal Laws.... lets run with that! How about tomorrow 9AM, NRA files a lawsuit against every single state and local government that has gun laws stricter than federal law! And uses this ruling as precedent! Just a thought. Poole The problem is this makes sense and is logical. 
|
|
It is my understanding that the ruling states that if you register to vote with a federal form, you can not be forced to show ID.
If you register with a State form, you can be forced to show ID. The only question is can everyone be forced to register, or re-register using only the state form. Jay |
|
Quoted:
It is my understanding that the ruling states that if you register to vote with a federal form, you can not be forced to show ID. If you register with a State form, you can be forced to show ID. The only question is can everyone be forced to register, or re-register using only the state form. Jay And the answer is no they cannot. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It is my understanding that the ruling states that if you register to vote with a federal form, you can not be forced to show ID. If you register with a State form, you can be forced to show ID. The only question is can everyone be forced to register, or re-register using only the state form. Jay And the answer is no they cannot. So this is just another step in the destruction of the US. |
|
The ruling has citied that a state can not force a voter to show more proof than the Federal government requires for a Federal election, ex: Presidential election. Although, it does allow the state to require further proof for state elections, ex: mayoral, city council, or county supervisor.
This makes some sense because Federal elections tend to cover vast areas compared to state level elections. It would also keep voters from trying to register in districts they don't belong to. The wishy washyness of the SC is starting to make me upset. You have rulings such as the past few gun related cases that lean very left, and then we get this one that seems almost as if it is a constitutionalist view. 
|
|
Quoted:
The ruling has citied that a state can not force a voter to show more proof than the Federal government requires for a Federal election, ex: Presidential election. Although, it does allow the state to require further proof for state elections, ex: mayoral, city council, or county supervisor. This makes some sense because Federal elections tend to cover vast areas compared to state level elections. It would also keep voters from trying to register in districts they don't belong to. The wishy washyness of the SC is starting to make me upset. You have rulings such as the past few gun related cases that lean very left, and then we get this one that seems almost as if it is a constitutionalist view. What gun rulings have leaned left? |