Posted: 3/9/2009 10:25:29 AM EDT
| Hope everyone saw the report that Jon Kyl said that the issue with Obama's birth eligibilty has been solved to his satisfaction since Snopes.com said it was all legit. I wrote the illustrious Senator and told him that in the future I will not bother him with troublesome inquirys about the political machinations going on at the Federal level, I will simply rely on Snopes.com for all my information since they seem to be doing the jobs our elected officials don't want to do. I am personally not that concerned over the "birth certificate" embroglio, but with these types representing us, we are going to be "waundering in the wilderness" for many decades to come. |
|
Quoted:
Arizona has some serious house cleaning to do. We need to be careful that those seats were going to turn over go to some PRO gun people instead of losing them to more Cali Libs that keep invading our state. ![]() BIG +1 Him and McCain gotta go. Even Gov. Brewer is saying raise taxes! |
|
I got a letter from Kyl about his voting for Holder. It was pathetic. In the beginning he acknowledges Holder's role in letting those terrorists go while Clinton was in office, and then Holders horrible record on the 2nd Amendment. Basically saying these are two great reasons not to vote for Holder. But then Kyl goes on to say he voted for Holder anyway just because he felt Holder was "qualified". Just pathetic. McCain surly needs to go. But at this point, after the Amnesty attempts, the No Banker Left Behind bailout, and now Holder, Kyl needs to go too.
Here is a guy I met at a gun show, and he seems pretty cool. He's running against Juan McCain in the Republican primary in 2010. Link to Jim Deakin for Senate. He is still getting signatures to be on the ballot. |
|
Republicans have for a very long time voted for the dems picks as long as they were "qualified". And the dems have torn our qualified candidates apart on their ideological stands. Rush is right, it's time for us to start using their tactics against them. I won't vote for any Republican that won't fight these liberal/socialists bastards tooth and nail. Going along to get along is not a viable tactic for winning and we've got to get rid of the old guard Republicans that still think that way. |
|
Quoted:
Republicans have for a very long time voted for the dems picks as long as they were "qualified". And the dems have torn our qualified candidates apart on their ideological stands. Rush is right, it's time for us to start using their tactics against them. I won't vote for any Republican that won't fight these liberal/socialists bastards tooth and nail. Going along to get along is not a viable tactic for winning and we've got to get rid of the old guard Republicans that still think that way. Exactly. The Dem's play for keeps. They don't give a shit about anything other than advancing the socialist agenda. We have to play the same way if we want to preserve the liberty we still have, and take back what we have lost. |
|
Personally, I'm done with this sham of a two party system where Republicans are only marginally different than the Democrats.
I too wrote McCain and Kyl about Holder and received the same lame ass replies. Check out http://www.constitutionparty.org/ Read their bullet points about what they stand for. If you agree....put up your time to help get their candidates on ballots in your areas. That's what I plan to do. Sean |
