Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
3/14/2005 12:33:26 PM EDT
If you were going to do a custom build which reciever would be best? Right now I own a Century Arms R1A1 built on a Hesse, I know, I know run the other way and the like, but I must have gotten a good one. Shoots so good the wife won't let me shoot it, she likes it too much so I need one for myself. Read all the posts on Hesse and am quite aware that this rifle is a rareity, also who carries the better parts kit? All info is greatly appreciated, thank-you
3/14/2005 2:34:52 PM EDT
[#1]
If I was to go all out??
I would get a DSA Type1.
3/14/2005 3:53:33 PM EDT
[#2]
DSA, Imbel, or DCI, all are excellent.
3/14/2005 4:44:23 PM EDT
[#3]
1. DSA
2. Imbel

Do not waste your money on a cast Coonan receiver when you can buy a forged, FN licsensed Imbel for the same price or cheaper. No offense Dan, but they are too expensive. Drop the Coonan receiver to $99 and it may make sense. I'd still pay the extra $75 for an Imbel personally.
3/15/2005 12:57:40 AM EDT
[#4]
DSA
3/15/2005 7:04:38 AM EDT
[#5]
Based on current supply, STG kit on DSA rec.
Darned happy with my Imbel kit from Dans and Imbel rec builds, but those remaining kits are tied up in the seizure fallout from IO.
3/17/2005 1:59:14 PM EDT
[#6]
DSA Hands down the best option, drop forged, made in the US, looks NICE, available in ALL three receiver types.  But is a bit pricey.

Imbel is FN licensed, forged but is only available in type III and does not count as 1 US part (also has the dot matrix import marks which looks unsightly).  Most affordable.  

Coonan: Cast but good quality, availability seems to be a problem however.  medium price range.
3/17/2005 3:46:07 PM EDT
[#7]
DSA Type 2
3/17/2005 4:03:50 PM EDT
[#8]
Sorry to be stupid, but what are the differences between the types 1, 2 or 3? Does one type have advantages over the others?thanx again
3/17/2005 5:30:05 PM EDT
[#9]
Type 3 is squared corner no lightening cuts or radi. Type 1 is the original has lightening cut or dish out if you will on the mag well, radius cut where the top and bottom seperate.Type 2 has one more radius a small one where the reciever meets the back of the lower. It was to reduce stress so it would not crack on full auto. Inch cut are diffrent by country but look diffrent than the above 3
3/17/2005 5:51:02 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
DSA Type 2



Plus 1!

My DSA Type 2 StG-58:







DSA Type 1 Receiver:



DSA Type 2



DSA Type 3

3/17/2005 9:04:18 PM EDT
[#11]
Anybody ever notice that DSA only mentions that the Type I was US Army pressure tested?

Not trying to say the T2 or T3 have anything wrong with them but if the T1 was good enough for 101.1K Cups....its pretty much all the same after that I think.

My vote? T1 just for the minor weight difference.

Type 1 Receivers - Not you fathers Oldsmobile anymore



3/17/2005 9:23:57 PM EDT
[#12]
DSA may have discontinued their T3 production
3/18/2005 1:53:05 PM EDT
[#13]
Imbel!  They're cheap and good (under $200 from most places).  DSA is nice, also but more money.
Armory Sponsor