Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
1/27/2011 3:51:59 PM EDT
I am looking at purchasing an M1A.  I have noticed that some have stamped/engraved serial numbers and Springfield Armory logo on the back of the receiver and others apear to be stenciled in either white or an odd shade of yellow.


Is there a reason for this?  Are they authentic?

Dave

1/27/2011 3:54:10 PM EDT
[#1]
You're probably seeing stamps that have been filled in with white or yellow crayon or chalk.
1/27/2011 4:25:03 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
You're probably seeing stamps that have been filled in with white or yellow crayon or chalk.


some people prefer color filling a grease pencil works the best and comes in many colors
1/31/2011 4:44:35 AM EDT
[#3]
Well I have looked the rifle over and found a few things that dont seem to add up to the original.

There is an additional piece added to the top rear of the receiver that has a hole in it.  I assume this is to add a scope mount, but I do not see this piece added to a new one in the box.  I also see an NM .062 stamp on the front sight.

Is it possible this is a MA9226 rather than a MA9106?  Same rifle except the barrel is chrome lined and it has NM sights and cost a couple hundred more.

Dave
1/31/2011 8:27:55 PM EDT
[#4]
Many non-match Springfields come with NM front sight posts. My Scout did.

The 'extra hole' in the top of the receiver is probably the second scope mount screw hole that replaces the stripper clip guide.

Neither would be identifiers of a completely different model.
2/11/2011 6:45:44 AM EDT
[#5]
Well I found the skinny from Springfield.

The rifle is not an MA9106 but instead an MA9226, according to their serial number database.  That means it is a loaded version of the synthetic stock M1A.  Although customer support checked and the manufacturing folks said they never color in the lettering, another customer support rep said that sometimes the serial number and information is not stamped right the first time around.  It is not stamped again if done wrong but instead laser eteched.

the second hole at the top is for a 4th Gen scope mount.  The piece is usually shipped when you purchase the mount from Springfield.  the previous owner did not revoe it.  Lucky me.

Looks like I made out pretty good on this purchase.

Dave
2/11/2011 5:37:51 PM EDT
[#6]
When you see how accurate it is you will love it more!
2/15/2011 7:06:56 AM EDT
[#7]
Cant wait.  I am looking at geting the 4th Gen scope mount from Springfield Armory.  they have two available.  One is Alum and the other Steel.  Anyone see an issue with either?  i am thinking the Alum as it is about $140 less expensive than the steel one.

Dave
2/15/2011 7:43:33 AM EDT
[#8]
The 4th gen is a new mount and may have overcome the aluminum problem, but some of their old Al mounts would shoot loose.  I dont like mating steel to aluminum in that manner, and in general believe in "buy once, cry once".

If I were buying a mount, I'd look at SEI, Sadlak, Basset, and ARMs, in that order.
2/15/2011 11:31:08 AM EDT
[#9]
Yeah I just saw the Basset one.  Looks pretty good and not much more than the Alum one from Springfield.

My concern is the single point attachment.  Keeping the mount from tipping forward or backward.

Dave
2/27/2011 6:00:45 PM EDT
[#10]
I don't have any issues with the Bassett on my SuperMatch.
2/27/2011 8:11:47 PM EDT
[#11]
My Bassett doesn't tip in any axis due to the vertical and horzontal steel inserts that mate to the cutouts in the receiver.
2/28/2011 9:34:01 AM EDT
[#12]
Well I will hopefully have mine soon.  Cant wait to try it out.  Of course I am not sure what scope to use.  Not sure I can afford a Nightforce or Leupold Mk IV but want something decent for the 100+yd shot that does not cost as much or more than the rifle..

Dave
Armory Sponsor