Armory Sponsor
Posted: 6/14/2015 9:19:59 PM EDT
| Is sig actually planning on releasing the mpx K? |
|
Quoted:
Class 3 Machining. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I made my own K model.  You cut your barrel down??? Class 3 Machining. And it functions well?? I always wondered how easy it would be to chop it and keep it reliable. It might change my timeframe if cutting is all you need. Someone needs to post pics of this thing RIGHT MEOW!!! |
|
Quoted:
And it functions well?? I always wondered how easy it would be to chop it and keep it reliable. It might change my timeframe if cutting is all you need. Someone needs to post pics of this thing RIGHT MEOW!!! Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I made my own K model. You cut your barrel down??? Class 3 Machining. And it functions well?? I always wondered how easy it would be to chop it and keep it reliable. It might change my timeframe if cutting is all you need. Someone needs to post pics of this thing RIGHT MEOW!!! 
|
|
Quoted:
Took it down to 4.5" just like the -K spec. I guess maybe 3.5" without busting out a tape measure. Quoted:
Quoted:
Awesome! How far inside the hand guard is the barrel? Took it down to 4.5" just like the -K spec. I guess maybe 3.5" without busting out a tape measure. That's awesome. Exactly what I want to end up with except a sbr |
|
Quoted:
Took it down to 4.5" just like the -K spec. I guess maybe 3.5" without busting out a tape measure. Quoted:
Quoted:
Awesome! How far inside the hand guard is the barrel? Took it down to 4.5" just like the -K spec. I guess maybe 3.5" without busting out a tape measure. Is that a tirant 9 or 9s? That looks awesome! |
|
Quoted:
Is that a tirant 9 or 9s? That looks awesome! Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Awesome! How far inside the hand guard is the barrel? Took it down to 4.5" just like the -K spec. I guess maybe 3.5" without busting out a tape measure. Is that a tirant 9 or 9s? That looks awesome! 9s 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I made my own K model. You cut your barrel down??? Class 3 Machining. And it functions well?? I always wondered how easy it would be to chop it and keep it reliable. It might change my timeframe if cutting is all you need. Someone needs to post pics of this thing RIGHT MEOW!!! http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=76752&prev=1 Oh goodness I think I just got a mysterious bulge in my pants.. |
|
Quoted:
we're paddling upstream in the same boat..don't waste energy...just go with the flow, and get one!!!! Quoted:
Quoted:
I keep telling myself I don't need an MPX but its not working. we're paddling upstream in the same boat..don't waste energy...just go with the flow, and get one!!!! Take hit, just one, you won't get addicted. Come on, all the cool kids are doing it. |
| If you are interested in K model and don't want to wait, look HERE. I am not affiliated with the seller, just came across it. |
|
Quoted:
Hopefully also a fix for the charging handle issue. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What's the gen II upper supposed to have that's better? Compatible with .40S&W and .357Sig conversion kits. Hopefully also a fix for the charging handle issue. What's the charging handle issue |
|
Quoted:
What's the charging handle issue Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What's the gen II upper supposed to have that's better? Compatible with .40S&W and .357Sig conversion kits. Hopefully also a fix for the charging handle issue. What's the charging handle issue I presume he's referring to the receiver wear caused by releasing the charging handle and it coming into contact with the lower. It could potentially be fixed with a raised area on the buffer spring retention piece. |
|
Quoted:
Yes that is what I was talking about. The slop in the charging handle is causing some very serious wear and damage to the lower and upper receiver. There are numerous posts already on it. 
All it should take is the addition of a shelf that sits in the changing handle channel off of the buffer spring/rod retention piece(Not sure what the technical term Sig uses for it). That would prevent the handle from sagging and shouldn't interfere with taking apart the gun. It would also be simple to retrofit to existing Gen 1s. |
Armory Sponsor