Armory Sponsor
Posted: 3/23/2009 7:05:52 PM EDT
|
Who uses one?
Faster than Lee cutter w/ Drill? What do you think? |
| Do yourself a favor and buy the power adaptor. It allows you to attach an electric drill to it instead of cranking the handle. A bump of the brigger on the drill beats cranking. I bought mine from midway for around $10. BTW, my Forster trimmer is 30+ years old and still going strong. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Faster than Lee cutter w/ Drill? Dunno, from the tutorials I have read on using the Lee cutter I would say probably not. I can tell you that I can trim 100 223 cases to 1.752" in about 20~25 minutes, and that is taking time to measure one every now and again. I imagine the Lee cutter is quicker? No...It takes me quite a bit longer to trim 100 .223 cases with Lee cutter. Thanks for the good info. |
|
I have used a Forster Trimmer for over 15 years and it is an excellent piece of equipment. How good is it? i just replaced the collet housing a year ago for all of $12. Manufactures don't stock parts for Legacy equipment unless it is Popular. Stay away from trimmers that use shell holders-stick with a collet type trimmer.
The only unit I have used or know of that is Better than a Forster is a Redding 2400($135.00). The Redding is better because tightening the collet requires only fingertip pressure and is less hard on the hands after trimming hundreds of cases. I Ialso like the Reddings ability to be mobile and attach to multiple work surfaces-Bench, Black and Decker Work Mate Portable Bench Etc. With the Forster you really have to screw the trimmer to a two by four and use bolts and wings nuts to attach it to benchtop or put the two by four in a vice as I have for years. Redding also requires no separate collets(Forster has 4) and comes with 6 of the most popular trimmer pilots. The 2400 also has a micrometer and makes adjustments easier especially when changing from on caliber to another. The 2400 is also highly consistent even more so than the Forster. |
Armory Sponsor
