Quote History Quoted:
That's correct regarding standard vs Tactical.
I want to know about F2000 Tactical vs FS2000 Tactical.
I couldn't find the answer on FNforum.
View Quote
It's a weird quark of how these guns were brought in. The regulated part elsewhere in the world is often the pressure vessel, ie the barrel/bolt. You'll notice on your FS2000 that is also serialized. When these were first brought in the idea was to change as little as possible to save on production cost. The FS2000 doesnt really have a receiver in the conventional sense, so when they were first imported it was argued that the stock assembly with it's serial number could serve as the receiver for the American market given the laws specific to the US governing firearms. To that effect there is a blocking bar in the stock as that portion had to be there to comply with NFA rules and the readily convertible standard. Now ignoring the fact that the gen 1 packs have the forward safety sear before that was removed on request, the front of the semi auto packs are notched to clear that bar which prevents the install of the auto packs.
Fast forward a bit and ATF decides that serials engraved directly in plastic are not ideal and the stock is not in keeping with what typically gets classified as the receiver and you get serials on the top rails of the tactical models (the first commercial one were the green batch then the black). Later you would see the left hand side of the barrel housing group on the Standard (factory optic model) get serialized as well. Off the top of my head I'm not sure if any of the commercial Standard models made it out without that there as they were brought in later, but there were FA F2000's that made it in without it, not to mention replacement parts.
I suppose that's a bit of a convoluted explanation, but if you keep in mind how long the FTISB approval and import processes can take it will make a bit more sense.