Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SCAR (Page 1 of 2)

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
4/12/2008 7:18:50 PM EDT
Gentelmen, Well by great surprise my local gun dealer had a couple real nice sales represenatives from FNH today displaying all the new 45 ACP pistols and as an added bonus they had a SCAR military prototype for first class personal inspection for the customer base this afternoon.  Now this 5.56 varient was in the standard desert tan configeration with all the goodies of a four position style stock which folded to the right and its modular design and break down was simple to understand and and vary simular to a MP5 in some aspects for disasembly.  After a brief time of holding the carbine and pointing it at the horizontal position i could really see how impressive the design is. The folding front sight appiture was vary unique in overall design. The prototype unit had a eotech mounted for display which played vary well with a optional front grip which handles just like an M4.  FN reps stated a civie modle would be out by next spring and an estimated 1800. to 2k price tag. The civie model will be updated with 5 position stock, but color was not discussed at this time.  Providing FNH can meet DOD and civie demand for this upcoming product Colt and the rest of the AR industry is going to have some serious problems keeping the butter on the table. FNH represenative stated the SCAR operating system and barrel has four times the service life of the curent DOD M4    

After all the hoopla i still had enough time to buy a NIB FS2000 scope standard model and get my free t shirt, Hee haa !!
4/12/2008 9:46:07 PM EDT
[#1]
I happened to stop buy also and got to play with the SCAR. It was very easy to take down and put back togther, which I did a few times. I really like the buttstock and the adjustment for the cheek piece. When I asked them a realistic price and ETA they also said $1800 to $2000. But they told me it would be August to October of this year depending on production. BIG_ELF's description is right on and it is a great looking and handling rifle IMO.
4/12/2008 11:01:02 PM EDT
[#2]
Sure, but this time did they show off their products without having an ND?
4/13/2008 12:45:12 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Gentelmen, Well by great surprise my local gun dealer had a couple real nice sales represenatives from FNH today displaying all the new 45 ACP pistols and as an added bonus they had a SCAR military prototype for first class personal inspection for the customer base this afternoon.  Now this 5.56 varient was in the standard desert tan configeration with all the goodies of a four position style stock which folded to the right and its modular design and break down was simple to understand and and vary simular to a MP5 in some aspects for disasembly.  After a brief time of holding the carbine and pointing it at the horizontal position i could really see how impressive the design is. The folding front sight appiture was vary unique in overall design. The prototype unit had a eotech mounted for display which played vary well with a optional front grip which handles just like an M4.  FN reps stated a civie modle would be out by next spring and an estimated 1800. to 2k price tag. The civie model will be updated with 5 position stock, but color was not discussed at this time.  Providing FNH can meet DOD and civie demand for this upcoming product Colt and the rest of the AR industry is going to have some serious problems keeping the butter on the table. FNH represenative stated the SCAR operating system and barrel has four times the service life of the curent DOD M4    

After all the hoopla i still had enough time to buy a NIB FS2000 scope standard model and get my free t shirt, Hee haa !!
If Busmaster/Magpul get the ACR out on 3qtr like they seem to be planning and in the $1400 - $1600 range, and is half the rifle everyone hopes it will be FN may be too late, too expencive, and too hard to find.  At least I think I know what I'm going to buy first.
4/13/2008 5:42:22 AM EDT
[#4]
The SCAR Light is still scheduled for 3rd quarter (probably the end) and the SCAR H is scheduled for 1st Quarter 2009.  Maybe the guy thought the OP was asking about the SCAR H or got the H and L mixed up (people make mistakes).  They have been pretty consistent in saying 3rd Quarter SCAR L release.

4/13/2008 5:50:40 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
If Busmaster/Magpul get the ACR out on 3qtr like they seem to be planning and in the $1400 - $1600 range, and is half the rifle everyone hopes it will be FN may be too late, too expencive, and too hard to find.  At least I think I know what I'm going to buy first.



Jeez, you can't even have a discussion in the FN forum about the SCAR without someone coming in to talk about the ACR.

I'd like to talk about the merits of the SCAR over the ACR, but that's impossible to do here without things becoming nasty and personal.

I encourage folks to read the SHOT Show 2008 SCAR thread under "General" here.
4/13/2008 7:55:20 AM EDT
[#6]
If it doesn't come in black, I won't be getting one.
No sand anywhere around here in PA.
4/13/2008 10:28:49 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
If it doesn't come in black, I won't be getting one.
No sand anywhere around here in PA.


Cause black blends in so much better out in the PA woods  

Sorry to break it to ya, but the tan rifle will blend in better in just about any environment. If ya like black thats great, but black sticks out in nature like a lighthouse beacon, so come up with a better reason next time
4/13/2008 2:17:31 PM EDT
[#8]
The FN reps said that they would most certainly be making them in black.  

I'd prefer it in black, but it's no deal breaker if I have to settle for tan
4/13/2008 3:22:49 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
If it doesn't come in black, I won't be getting one.
No sand anywhere around here in PA.


Cause black blends in so much better out in the PA woods  

Sorry to break it to ya, but the tan rifle will blend in better in just about any environment. If ya like black thats great, but black sticks out in nature like a lighthouse beacon, so come up with a better reason next time


Really????? Tan blends better at night than black?  Thanks for trying.
4/13/2008 3:50:41 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
The FN reps said that they would most certainly be making them in black.  

I'd prefer it in black, but it's no deal breaker if I have to settle for tan


Will they offer a tan civil model too?
4/13/2008 7:09:42 PM EDT
[#11]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
If it doesn't come in black, I won't be getting one.
No sand anywhere around here in PA.


Cause black blends in so much better out in the PA woods  he


Really????? Tan blends better at night than black?  Thanks for trying. At night, everything looks dark (black) because there is no light on them. Illuminate a black gun out doors, and you see a black gun against a background of whatever. Illuminate a FDE gun, and you see FDE, which blends better than black.
4/13/2008 7:46:17 PM EDT
[#12]
Relax folks.

They will have black guns.  They will at some point even have OD options from what I've read after folks got back from SHOT.

It's not like this is some small operation that can only produce so much or is limited by funds here.  

4/13/2008 7:53:26 PM EDT
[#13]
Honestly i think that any natual color for this sytem would work for me.   The tan looked way to cool and gave the system a different look by exploring a different attitude just like the first PS90's were green at the begining of the import game.  I belive that i will have the money ready for the SCAR and bypass the BM/magpul system, strictly based on popularity and the design profile from a major DOD company like FNH.

I really like how the SCAR can be modified with no special tools to eject from the right or left making it an ideal and handy carbine.  I love original Colt 6920/M4 but as this carbine become more attractive over time with standard features already in place like rail sytems  in the forearm for lights and Front grip i can see the SCAR really becoming a true bargin if you start looking at how much money can be dumped on an M4 and post accessory add ons.  I already have a nice looking eotech 553 waiting for a chance to hook up with this new FN product.      
4/13/2008 7:53:50 PM EDT
[#14]
Personally, I'll take any color but pink, lol. The Black just looks plain sexy, the FDE looks great and would add color to my safe, and OD would be bad ass as well.

Black still shows up more at night than FDE, I take it you don't have a NVD?
4/13/2008 8:25:07 PM EDT
[#15]

I really like how the SCAR can be modified with no special tools to eject from the right or left making it an ideal and handy carbine.


You mean that the charging handle can be placed on the left or right side?  I have not seen any picture of a SCAR with a physical opening on the left side of the receiver that would allow the weapon to eject a cartridge to the left.

Jason
4/14/2008 4:23:54 AM EDT
[#16]
I'm waiting with baited breath, but it seems that they might be cutting close with the shitty possabilities of the election.
4/14/2008 9:10:57 AM EDT
[#17]
I honestly can't believe people are making purchase decisions based on the COLOR.

4/14/2008 9:22:12 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
I honestly can't believe people are making purchase decisions based on the COLOR.



So you are the type that goes to the dealership and buys a car regardless of it's color as well? It's a large purchase, I can understand someone waiting to get exactly what they want. Personally, I think they look good in any color so I'm getting the first L and H I can find. I am especially fond of the tan and black 2 tone though
4/14/2008 10:23:55 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
If Busmaster/Magpul get the ACR out on 3qtr like they seem to be planning and in the $1400 - $1600 range, and is half the rifle everyone hopes it will be FN may be too late, too expencive, and too hard to find.  At least I think I know what I'm going to buy first.


I think there are plenty of shooters/collectors in the US that will buy both the SCAR and MASADA.  I will certainly be buying both because I like the way both designs are executed.
4/14/2008 12:00:55 PM EDT
[#20]
I highly doubt that FN is even taking the ACR seriously. With all due respect to Magpul, it was designed by a business who made their mark selling plastic molded gimmicks, and has just recently garnered any real respectability with their stocks which are great, but IMO way over priced. Now the design is being produced by Bushmaster, who is a second rate AR15 company that has no real experience selling squat to the .mil. FN is one of the largest military suppliers in the world with years upon years of experience building weapons.......not to mention 1000x more revenue went into building and testing the scar as opposed to the ACR. I would take a wild guess that the ACR/masada/bushmaster is nothing more than a pesky insect to them, and won't put the slightest dent in their revenue.
4/14/2008 1:51:36 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
I highly doubt that FN is even taking the ACR seriously. With all due respect to Magpul, it was designed by a business who made their mark selling plastic molded gimmicks, and has just recently garnered any real respectability with their stocks which are great, but IMO way over priced. Now the design is being produced by Bushmaster, who is a second rate AR15 company that has no real experience selling squat to the .mil. FN is one of the largest military suppliers in the world with years upon years of experience building weapons.......not to mention 1000x more revenue went into building and testing the scar as opposed to the ACR. I would take a wild guess that the ACR/masada/bushmaster is nothing more than a pesky insect to them, and won't put the slightest dent in their revenue.


Magpul may be new, but their engineers are sharp, and Cerberus brings a lot to the table. Don't sell them short.

For what it is worth, everything FN makes that Browning or Stoner didn't have a hand in is pretty much crap. Their new pistols, P90, F2000, etc. They made their name with belt feds and Hi-Powers.
4/14/2008 1:55:54 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
I highly doubt that FN is even taking the ACR seriously. With all due respect to Magpul, it was designed by a business who made their mark selling plastic molded gimmicks, and has just recently garnered any real respectability with their stocks which are great, but IMO way over priced. Now the design is being produced by Bushmaster, who is a second rate AR15 company that has no real experience selling squat to the .mil. FN is one of the largest military suppliers in the world with years upon years of experience building weapons.......not to mention 1000x more revenue went into building and testing the scar as opposed to the ACR. I would take a wild guess that the ACR/masada/bushmaster is nothing more than a pesky insect to them, and won't put the slightest dent in their revenue.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman

Now, lets not make this another pointless SCAR vs. Masada debate.
4/14/2008 2:26:20 PM EDT
[#23]
I'll buy one. Looking forward to it.

I prefer metal long guns to plastic ones so this is where my non AR money is going to go. I hopefully will have nicely recovered by then from the GAP and SOCOM II purchases.  
4/14/2008 2:46:51 PM EDT
[#24]
Here's the original post I made about it in the WA HT forum:


Quoted:
...Well, I came, I saw, & I survived to talk about it.  Actually, I have to say that, IMO, it appears to live up to the hype - at least judging from my finger-fiddling it.  The model on hand looked well-worn, w/ some finish burnt off at the bbl.  The prototype in question looked like a 3rd-gen unit, judging from the configuration, & was said to be ~3 years old w/ serious FA action & some time in the sandbox for testing & dispensing of BG's under its belt.  Kinda' felt like I was holding a small piece of history in my hands.

Anyway, here's a component rundown, as I saw it, of the SCAR-L prototype I got to handle (but not shoot ):

Stock:
Felt comfortable & solid, w/o wobble or play in the lockup.  The adjustments allowed for truly personalized fitment.  One interesting little bit was that a detent pin (up next to the buttpad, on the L-side) can be pulled (it stays captive - like all the other push pins & the bbl. screws) to allow the buttpad to be removed.  Inside is a small compartment that can store 123-batteries or small similar items.  I found it somewhat novel, but useful nonetheless.

Irons:
In terms of build quality, the sights as seen in various internet photos, already impressed me, but I had to give them a AAA stamp of approval after trying them out in person.  In sum, the SCAR F/R irons are some of the best I've ever seen on a production rifle.  I mean, the quality is just amazing.  I've been waiting (how long?) for a dual-aperture flip-up rear w/ windage + elevation adjustments, & the FN SCAR delivered. The rear flip utilizes a ball-detent mechanism to keep it in place (up or down).  It's simply well made, & the front compliments it nicely in the form of a folding (locks up & down), hooded, elevation-adjustable piece.  My only gripe would be their height placement, but the RFP requirements dictated this, so I can't point the finger @ FN.  Still, they were fast & easy to acquire on target, & they cowitnessed perfectly w/ the Eotech, which was no slouch itself.  I've gotta bow to SMGLee's wisdom here, as I'm rapidly becoming an Eotech fan.

Upper/Lower:
Straight off, the aluminum upper is the serialized component.  Even despite its extensive use, this particular upper still appeared to show no real wear & the reciprocating components moved freely but w/o play when we got to see it being taken down.  Upper-lower-stock fitment was also nice & snug.

The lower is constructed of a polymide material, w/ ambi controls throughout (except that the bolt catch-release is L-side, as w/ the AR).  The LE/Mil release vesion will have a 90 deg throw between S-1-A modes.  No one could say what type of throw arc the commercial semi would have.  I only dry fired it a couple times, but the trigger felt pretty crisp.  I also got to to play w/ the FN steel 5.56 mag, which was a fairly solid piece & was AR-smooth in/out of the magwell.

Internal components:
The bolt carrier is a heavy piece of steel - stout enough to be a "melee" weapon in its own right, & leaves no doubt as to how the fire rate reduction was achieved.  The bolt itself looks like an AR bolt beefed up all the way around.  I'd almost have to describe the operation method as sort of hybrid long + short-stroke op system, in as much as the carrier extension is analogous to the AK-style carrier piston (except it reciprocates inside the receiver & not in a cylinder/tube attached to the bbl.); the gas block tappet is the short-stroke part of the system.  The carrier's extension goes all the way up front to the front sight/tappet gas block where it's impinged by the tappet.  The gas block has 2 settings.  Interestingly, the adjustment knob was stuck in position on this one due to extensive powder gumming it up.  Apparently, it'll still shoot, but it needed to be cranked on to free it up & get it to adjust.

The reciprocating cocking handle felt (to me) to be less in the line of my hands than I thought, but w/o a foregrip, you'll still need to grab the forearm more towards the front to avoid getting smacked; gripping by the magwell (more than a few do this) was no problem in this regard.  The gun was equipped w/ a Tango Down foregip that made for a prefect combination.  My one gripe is that the grip portion of the cocking handle is made of polymide plastic.  Seems to me that FN could/should make it an all-steel unit, as I figure a good drop or scrape against a hard surface might break it, but it was still fully intact after 3 years of hard use, so what do I know?

Bottom line:
Might be a winner.  The build quality, even on this well-worn unit, was still apparent, & it balanced well in my hands.  I like the controls & placement, the irons, the general feel, etc.  My only concern is how long before FN can get them out in sufficient commercial volume.  I definitely want mine in black, which I was told will be forthcoming, but only later on, & not immediately upon release.  FDE doesn't do it for me, but if politics goes to hell, I'll throw down, buy some Rite-dye, & send the upper off for a refinish, if it comes down to it.  Hopefully, it won't come to that.

Good gun.  I'm impressed.


BTW - I was the guy w/ the camera.
4/14/2008 2:47:20 PM EDT
[#25]
I'm getting both....just FYI

as in SCAR-L and an ACR

Both will be non-SBR'd for now....but when I have the cash...both will have 10-12" barrels...

Those are my plans and for now...I could care less what color they come in...as long as we can buy them.
4/14/2008 3:12:23 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
I'm getting both....just FYI

as in SCAR-L and an ACR

Both will be non-SBR'd for now....but when I have the cash...both will have 10-12" barrels...

Those are my plans and for now...I could care less what color they come in...as long as we can buy them.


I started reading this and thought; "Wait a minute.  Fivepointoh lives in Illinois.  He can't have SBR's.  Silly Fivepointoh."  Then I saw you no longer live in that hole.  Good for you bro!  Must've missed the move.

Anyway, I don't think that FN is worried about civie sales at all.  They have the contract with DOD for SOCOM.  That is all that matters.  Civie sales are a distant second or third.  The money that the civilian market brings into this business is usually pennies in comparison for the big boys that have government contracts.  

Oh, and like the enlightened Fivepointoh; I will be getting both.
4/14/2008 3:29:35 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I'm getting both....just FYI

as in SCAR-L and an ACR

Both will be non-SBR'd for now....but when I have the cash...both will have 10-12" barrels...

Those are my plans and for now...I could care less what color they come in...as long as we can buy them.


I started reading this and thought; "Wait a minute.  Fivepointoh lives in Illinois.  He can't have SBR's.  Silly Fivepointoh."  Then I saw you no longer live in that hole.  Good for you bro!  Must've missed the move.

Anyway, I don't think that FN is worried about civie sales at all.  They have the contract with DOD for SOCOM.  That is all that matters.  Civie sales are a distant second or third.  The money that the civilian market brings into this business is usually pennies in comparison for the big boys that have government contracts.  

Oh, and like the enlightened Fivepointoh; I will be getting both.


Clasky...yep, moved about a month ago.

Working on an 11.5" build right now.  Getting my IN license on Friday and ordering my 11.5" upper on Saturday.  Also ordering the lower w/ it which will be put on a 4473 as a pistol and the stock will reside at a friends house.  

Then I'll have my lower engraved and then ship off the Form 1.

Hope you're doin good bro!

BTW IN is so much nicer than IL
4/14/2008 4:06:00 PM EDT
[#28]
Look at it this way.

The FS2000 and PS90 came out first in one color OD Green and when people demanded black sure enough the black FS2000s and PS90s came to market.

If the SCAR comes out first in FDE you can probably make a safe bet that it will come out in other colors as well.

Civilian sales may not amount to as much as their SOCOM contract, but keep in mind that this is a company that is all about making every dime they can and God bless their capitalist hearts for it. If civilians want black they'll give you black..if enough people demand midnight purple they'll give you that. Whatever it takes to make larger profits.

4/14/2008 7:09:10 PM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I highly doubt that FN is even taking the ACR seriously. With all due respect to Magpul, it was designed by a business who made their mark selling plastic molded gimmicks, and has just recently garnered any real respectability with their stocks which are great, but IMO way over priced. Now the design is being produced by Bushmaster, who is a second rate AR15 company that has no real experience selling squat to the .mil. FN is one of the largest military suppliers in the world with years upon years of experience building weapons.......not to mention 1000x more revenue went into building and testing the scar as opposed to the ACR. I would take a wild guess that the ACR/masada/bushmaster is nothing more than a pesky insect to them, and won't put the slightest dent in their revenue.


Magpul may be new, but their engineers are sharp, and Cerberus brings a lot to the table. Don't sell them short.

For what it is worth, everything FN makes that Browning or Stoner didn't have a hand in is pretty much crap. Their new pistols, P90, F2000, etc. They made their name with belt feds and Hi-Powers.


You think the fs2000, ps90, and fnp pistols are junk? Thats quite laughable.
4/15/2008 8:03:58 AM EDT
[#30]
I will buy a Bushmaster ACR instead of the SCAR L.

However I may pick up a SCAR H at some point.
4/17/2008 12:32:28 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
You think the fs2000, ps90, and fnp pistols are junk? Thats quite laughable.





4/17/2008 10:03:53 AM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:

Quoted:
You think the fs2000, ps90, and fnp pistols are junk? Thats quite laughable.







Oh well, Good I hope Combat Jack doesn't purchase a SCAR. That's good news. They are already going to be in very high demand so we can certainly do without one more guy trying to buy a SCAR.


Good luck with that ACR Combat Jack.

4/17/2008 10:50:13 AM EDT
[#33]
SCAR looks good.  Most everything else FN makes doesn't.

As for the ACR, I have my reasons for wanting one.
4/17/2008 11:46:04 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
SCAR looks good.  Most everything else FN makes doesn't.

As for the ACR, I have my reasons for wanting one.


Maybe you should try "shooting" them instead of "looking" at them. I have yet to see anyone in person that didn't love shooting the ps, fs, or any of the FNP handguns, or even the five seven for that matter. I'm sure the scar will be no different......

<-----------ar15 section that way and the Magpul koolaid forum is this way------------>
4/17/2008 12:47:55 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
SCAR looks good.  Most everything else FN makes doesn't.

As for the ACR, I have my reasons for wanting one.



<-----------ar15 section that way and the Magpul koolaid forum is this way------------>


NICELY said!!!  
4/17/2008 1:17:40 PM EDT
[#36]
i would love to have a SCAR-L (or H, for that matter) to SBR.
4/17/2008 1:52:33 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:

For what it is worth, everything FN makes that Browning or Stoner didn't have a hand in is pretty much crap. Their new pistols, P90, F2000, etc. They made their name with belt feds and Hi-Powers.


Hey jack for so many posts you have here on AR15, first get a life,  second you don't know shit about the FS2000 and yet you type with such athority it makes me laugh.
4/17/2008 2:27:26 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:

For what it is worth, everything FN makes that Browning or Stoner didn't have a hand in is pretty much crap. Their new pistols, P90, F2000, etc. They made their name with belt feds and Hi-Powers.


Hey jack for so many posts you have here on AR15, first get a life,  second you don't know shit about the FS2000 and yet you type with such athority it makes me laugh.


I am in my lane, but you have left yours. I will not elaborate further.



Quoted:

Quoted:
SCAR looks good.  Most everything else FN makes doesn't.

As for the ACR, I have my reasons for wanting one.


Maybe you should try "shooting" them instead of "looking" at them. I have yet to see anyone in person that didn't love shooting the ps, fs, or any of the FNP handguns, or even the five seven for that matter. I'm sure the scar will be no different......

<-----------ar15 section that way and the Magpul koolaid forum is this way------------>


Some people are easily amused. Last time I shot FN products the ammo was free and I still was so frustrated with them that I gave up and let others burn up the free ammo.
4/17/2008 4:52:55 PM EDT
[#39]
i think it would be awesome if people quit angrily arguing over shit in the technical forums.
5/1/2008 3:36:11 PM EDT
[#40]
If it doesn't come in Black, how will people know it is EVIL!

As to $1800-2000, it seems most SASS, MK12, railed guns come in at about that price.

Can a SCAR 223 be turned into a SCAR 308?

5/2/2008 6:59:42 AM EDT
[#41]
Ok,

1)  The SCAR will come in black the only question is when will black be available.  The FS2000 and PS90 came in OD green at first, but were later sold in evil black.  

2)  The price for the SCAR hasn't been announced yet it could be less than that or it could be slightly more.  Keep in mind though that you get the full rail system (monolith top rail, side rails, and lower rail) standard along with BUIS and a folding/collapsable stock all from a company that produces 80% of US Military small arms.  The SCAR is built to milspec by a company that has a reputation second to none for their quality.  If you look at similiar rifles like the XCR and start adding the options the SCAR has as standard to it you'll be over the $1700 mark.  Plus remember we get a barrel with a 30,000 round service life and a rifle with a rated 90,000 round service life. That's beyond the majority of AR barrels and rifles available.  Oh, and I hear the trigger is very nice.

3)  The SCAR L can be turned into the SCAR H as they share 80% parts commonality.  Whether seperate SCAR H conversion kits will be sold and when is unknown at this point.  However, the SCAR H will be available for sale in the First Quarter of 2009.

5/2/2008 10:34:08 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
3)  The SCAR L can be turned into the SCAR H as they share 80% parts commonality.  Whether seperate SCAR H conversion kits will be sold and when is unknown at this point.  However, the SCAR H will be available for sale in the First Quarter of 2009.


Last thing I read about the SCAR indicated that this is not true.

The H and L receiver/chassis is not the same - I think the H is slightly longer...

I will be getting both!
5/2/2008 12:01:25 PM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:

Quoted:
3)  The SCAR L can be turned into the SCAR H as they share 80% parts commonality.  Whether seperate SCAR H conversion kits will be sold and when is unknown at this point.  However, the SCAR H will be available for sale in the First Quarter of 2009.


Last thing I read about the SCAR indicated that this is not true.

The H and L receiver/chassis is not the same - I think the H is slightly longer...

I will be getting both!


You're right, but the receiver isn't a whole rifle.  They were going to do a common receiver and they were in fact working on that got shelved and from what I hear there is a fair chance they'll come back later and look at that as an option (as in years from now).  However, they are still showing in all their marketing material that the L and H have 80% part commonality. I'm not sure what they count and how much they count it for percentage wise, but that's the number they are throwing out there.

5/2/2008 11:10:31 PM EDT
[#44]
I think it was some early literature or a review that said that it was convertable from 223 to .308.  But I guess I may have confused the 80% comment, but I don't think so.To me all the improvements are nice, but they are evolutionary, not revolutionary.  I'd like to see a kenetic to electric system to replace all the batteries.  Built in video capability (not really for civy use) for net centric warfare, around the corner shots, and IFF.  Built in laser range finding and target solution computation.To me the SCAR is a highly polished canon ball, but still a canon ball.  Let's move onto the howitzer.
5/3/2008 11:51:15 AM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:
I think it was some early literature or a review that said that it was convertable from 223 to .308.  But I guess I may have confused the 80% comment, but I don't think so.  To me all the improvements are nice, but they are evolutionary, not revolutionary.  I'd like to see a kenetic to electric system to replace all the batteries.  Built in video capability (not really for civy use) for net centric warfare, around the corner shots, and IFF.  Built in laser range finding and target solution computation.  To me the SCAR is a highly polished canon ball, but still a canon ball.  Let's move onto the howitzer.


This sort of whiz-bang electronic stuff should remain as modular components, interfacing w/ the rails - one of the the primary reasons for rails in the 1st place - & replaceable w/ new upgrades as new, improved versions come online.  80%+ parts commonality doesn't include 5.56 -> 7.62 conversion.

Development of the common-receiver platform is supposedly ongoing, but no one knows whether or not it will become reality outside the factory at this point.  I'm not sure that a heavy, 7.62-capable receiver would be so ideal for 5.56/6.8 applications, but no doubt, the driving force behind a 1-size-fits-all platform is probably cost-reduction.
5/4/2008 3:25:30 AM EDT
[#46]
I played with a SCAR at the "east coast" SAR show yesterday in York, PA and I was really disappointed!!!  Now, not because there was something wrong with the rifle, but because I did not want to like and when I did -- I realized I better starting saving for the purchase!  It was very slick and shouldered very nice.

While I was there i also got to fondle a SCAR Heavy and it to went right on the must have list (anybody need a kidney from a non drinker).  I asked the rep how the recoil was compared to the heavier FAL I had and he said not bad.  The rep then said, "you must recognize that magazine (meaning the FAL 20rnd mag in the rifle)."  I said "yes" and asked when the 30rnd mags were coming back out and he laughed.

Anyway, he says the SCAR lights will be December -- Heavies -- he had no idea.  He also said that the Lights were going to be released in the desert color scheme.

They had some nice marketing garb.  I got a nice 12"x12" brochure and they threw my buddy a SCAR challenge coin for me.  NOW I'm like, obligated to buy one.........  

5/4/2008 10:36:03 AM EDT
[#47]
So, does the SCAR Heavy take FAL mags??? Or a proprietary one?
5/4/2008 11:50:38 AM EDT
[#48]
FN was at a local gun range around where I live and they let me buy some ammo and shoot it. Which was fun. It has a pretty slow rate of fire as I'm sure you guys know, so it is easily controllable. The FN reps were very nice and they said the Civi version of the SCAR should be out by November of this year.
5/5/2008 9:57:56 AM EDT
[#49]
From waht I've been able to find, the SCAR H uses a proprietary magazine, not a FAL mag, though the appearance is similar.
5/5/2008 11:08:28 AM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
3)  The SCAR L can be turned into the SCAR H as they share 80% parts commonality.  Whether seperate SCAR H conversion kits will be sold and when is unknown at this point.  However, the SCAR H will be available for sale in the First Quarter of 2009.


Last thing I read about the SCAR indicated that this is not true.

The H and L receiver/chassis is not the same - I think the H is slightly longer...

I will be getting both!


You're right, but the receiver isn't a whole rifle.  They were going to do a common receiver and they were in fact working on that got shelved and from what I hear there is a fair chance they'll come back later and look at that as an option (as in years from now).  However, they are still showing in all their marketing material that the L and H have 80% part commonality. I'm not sure what they count and how much they count it for percentage wise, but that's the number they are throwing out there.



With the SCAR the receiver/chassis is the registered part. It IS the gun. So no you cannot convert a L to an H - without owning one of each.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SCAR (Page 1 of 2)

Armory Sponsor