Posted: 6/11/2019 11:57:29 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote History Quoted:
That might be possible, but with my limited experience I have found that a belt fed system really needs a quick change barrel system. A 200 round belt gets the barrel pretty darn hot. But that is only around 20 to 30 seconds of running. So to me the cheapest belt feed set up might not be the best set up. SAW barrels can be found from $350 that might be shot out to over $1,200 each for brand new. Certainly the SAW system could be adapted, but what would that cost? I would imagine a deal could be struck with FN, but how many sets of parts would be a minimum order? The bolt group would need to be adapted to the Mac style fire control and a housing (adapter) for the SAW parts would need to be engineered, tested, and submitted to the FATD. How much would all that cost?
The Tenko adapter has been tested with the Shrike, but at $3k for the Tenko plus $4k for the MCR, that's 2k over the $5k budget. Belt fed anything is not cheap. Custom made anything is three or four times the cost of of the shelf parts. While the concept sounds cool, access to parts is the biggest problem. With a semiautomatic SAW at over $7,000, a custom version for Mac style RRs for $5,000 doesn't seem to very likely to me. YMMV.
Scott View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Hopefully a sub $5k BELTFED.
Not out ofnthebrealm of possibility. In fact, an open-bolt piston driven beltfed makes a lot of sense That might be possible, but with my limited experience I have found that a belt fed system really needs a quick change barrel system. A 200 round belt gets the barrel pretty darn hot. But that is only around 20 to 30 seconds of running. So to me the cheapest belt feed set up might not be the best set up. SAW barrels can be found from $350 that might be shot out to over $1,200 each for brand new. Certainly the SAW system could be adapted, but what would that cost? I would imagine a deal could be struck with FN, but how many sets of parts would be a minimum order? The bolt group would need to be adapted to the Mac style fire control and a housing (adapter) for the SAW parts would need to be engineered, tested, and submitted to the FATD. How much would all that cost? The Tenko adapter has been tested with the Shrike, but at $3k for the Tenko plus $4k for the MCR, that's 2k over the $5k budget. Belt fed anything is not cheap. Custom made anything is three or four times the cost of of the shelf parts. While the concept sounds cool, access to parts is the biggest problem. With a semiautomatic SAW at over $7,000, a custom version for Mac style RRs for $5,000 doesn't seem to very likely to me. YMMV. Scott My mileage does vary but your repetitive, tired response to a possible Lage belt doesn’t. And you love and respect his work, you make different products, you don’t consider him a competitor — we know. Goddamn. If there is one thing that needs your wet blanket, it sure as hell isn’t anything Richard produces.
ETA: And yeah, the 11/15 is nuts banana. I can’t wait for the a1.
|
|