Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 8/16/2017 12:57:57 AM EDT
Parts other than an actual weapon as the machine gun?  For example, when an SOT form 2's an HK sear pack as the machine gun, that can be used in a semi auto non machine gun.  What are there rules as to what can and cannot be registered?  

Thanks,

Brick
Link Posted: 8/16/2017 1:04:24 AM EDT
[#1]
If the device allows a non-MG to fire automatically, it's registered as a machinegun, with some description about its "conversion device/apparatus" status in the additional description block.

If it doesn't have a barrel, barrel length is N/A.

If it doesn't have a barrel or an intrinsic caliber, caliber is N/A.
Link Posted: 8/17/2017 8:50:05 AM EDT
[#2]
What I am looking to do is register the converted bolt carrier of an RPD as the conversion device.  It will be cut to fit the semi receiver.  The full auto trigger assembly will also be used, but I think I should not have to register that as you don't register the M-16 trigger group parts used when using a DIAS.

Brick
Link Posted: 8/17/2017 10:16:40 AM EDT
[#3]
As long as the full auto trigger assembly fits the semi receiver without modifications, then the modified bolt carrier will be the conversion device, which you would mark and register. Pretty much the same thing as slotting a full auto bolt to fit a semi Uzi receiver.

If there are mods you have to make to other parts to fit the semi receiver, in order for it to function as an MG, then you might have to submit a sample to BATFE Tech Branch for determination as to which part they consider the conversion device, and which would be the part you'd have to mark and register.
Link Posted: 8/17/2017 12:23:32 PM EDT
[#4]
How about with a Ruger 10/22 that has the hammer and bolt modified and a new sear made?
Link Posted: 8/17/2017 2:21:21 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How about with a Ruger 10/22 that has the hammer and bolt modified and a new sear made?
View Quote
In a conversion like you described, most in the past have registered the sear, although a better choice would have been to register the trigger frame, which also probably required modifications, because it was the largest and most durable piece of the conversion parts set.

Think of an AR-15 DIAS - the body is the largest and most durable part, even though the sear is also different and a distinct, new part from a GI sear, so absent a BATFE directive, either could have wound up being the marked, registered part

M2 carbine conversion kits could register any one of the seven conversion parts, but most used the disconnector, which became the "machinegun", and the other parts could be replaced. Original M2-marked carbine receivers were considered RRs, and all the parts were just replaceable spare parts for M2 RR owners.
Link Posted: 8/19/2017 8:40:46 PM EDT
[#6]
We registered the Bolt and the lower at my shop the lower has to be cut to fit the semi frame so we numbered both
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top