Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
3/27/2008 12:42:56 AM EDT
Now before you get all in a tissy, IBTL..  this is a serious question.. not trolling, and not attempting to do anything illegal.  I am merely seekeing information, and supporting links....

SO---- Converting an AR15 to an automatic weapon... Can Law Enforcement agencies do this? Or is this prohibited?  I know Individual Officer's are not allowed to do this or even purchase a machine gun for duty use, has to be agency purchased, then issued to officer for duty use.  I know LE agencies can just order a new M4....  But lets say the department has 20 AR 15's.  Can the department legally purchase the full auto conversion parts, and turn them into machineguns, or MUST a department order machine guns new.  

I am trying to find the information out for another officer, and my head is starting to hurt looking through the US Code, CGA, & NFA...

So.. Can the department do this, what is the process and paperwork required for doing this, and can you link me to the applicable code so I can read it.

Does this fall under "Manufacturing an NFA Firearm"... or a different catergory?

Thanks.
3/27/2008 1:22:36 AM EDT
[#1]
the easy route would be to have a C2 do the conversions, then transfer them to the department on paper.


3/27/2008 4:58:38 AM EDT
[#2]
so the department could do this instead of having to buy new weapons... Just have the C2 dealer order al parts & transfer to agency... sounds easy enough.... and from what I could tell in the code, goverment entities are exempt from paying the transfer tax, so no $250 pop for each rifle...  
3/27/2008 6:06:08 AM EDT
[#3]
There are plenty of FFL/SOT's out there willing to do all of this for departments
3/27/2008 7:28:06 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
so the department could do this instead of having to buy new weapons... Just have the C2 dealer order al parts & transfer to agency... sounds easy enough.... and from what I could tell in the code, goverment entities are exempt from paying the transfer tax, so no $250 pop for each rifle...  

Correct. LE agencies are exempt from paying the manufacturing/making tax (which is $200, not $250, BTW).
3/27/2008 8:19:33 AM EDT
[#5]
I would imagine that the machine work on the lower receivers would complicate the cost beyond reason. Just trade in the rifles and buy new machine guns, if that's what your agency wants.
3/27/2008 9:03:23 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
I would imagine that the machine work on the lower receivers would complicate the cost beyond reason. Just trade in the rifles and buy new machine guns, if that's what your agency wants.


If you have the jig to locate the sear pin hole (about $35 or so for a jig) the machining is quite simple.  At most, you have to enlarge the pocket at the rear of the receiver and then drill one pin hole.

A rookie machinist could do the job in a half-hour or less.
3/27/2008 9:24:10 AM EDT
[#7]
FWIW, because of legal liability issues, many/most LE departments prefer to buy new MGs (or in this case, new lowers) from licensed manufacturers rather than doing the machine work themselves, in-house. It can make a difference at civil lawsuit time.
3/27/2008 9:28:12 AM EDT
[#8]
AFAIK there is more to it than that in the form of paperwork, either before or after the conversion.

BTW, building an AR is easy as cake but there are plenty of people (LEO or otherwise) that dont feel up to it.  I would imagine that sentiment carries over to this moreso than just assembeling an AR!  Basically, I'm not sure how many people at the average department would feel comfortable taking a drillbit to their receiver.

Yes its simple but a FFL/SOT would be able to handle it for little cost, they'd likely do all the paperwork for them and it would be helping out a FFL/SOT which we can all appreciate.  

Edit: Also, +1 to what Tony said about liability.
3/27/2008 6:00:05 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
FWIW, because of legal liability issues, many/most LE departments prefer to buy new MGs (or in this case, new lowers) from licensed manufacturers rather than doing the machine work themselves, in-house. It can make a difference at civil lawsuit time.


Oh yeah.. I wouldn't think the department would tackle this on their own..  They would have a someone qualified that does this sort of thing.. I just didn't know if it was legal for a department to do this.  Thanks for all the answers guys.
3/28/2008 2:02:28 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
FWIW, because of legal liability issues, many/most LE departments prefer to buy new MGs (or in this case, new lowers) from licensed manufacturers rather than doing the machine work themselves, in-house. It can make a difference at civil lawsuit time.


Oh yeah.. I wouldn't think the department would tackle this on their own..  They would have a someone qualified that does this sort of thing.. I just didn't know if it was legal for a department to do this.  Thanks for all the answers guys.


One big additional note: While it is legal for a department to do this, and they are exempt from paying the $200 manufacturing tax, federal law requires that they still file a Form 1, Application to Make and Register an NFA Firearm, with BATFE before doing the conversion.

Just buying the parts and doing the conversion with no paperwork makes the guns contraband under federal law. Since they are LE owned they would not be confiscated if discovered after the fact, but BATFE would require them to be registered (like any seized unregistered MGs must be) via a Form 10, which means they can never be sold to anyone except an LE agency (even an FFL/SOT dealer cannot take them in trade).

Form 10 (after-the-fact) registration is much more restrictive, and you lose 100% of the value, so I'd suggest your department instead file Form 1s before converting them. Same paperwork, same (zero) cost, but doing the paperwork beforehand retains some of the trade-in value.
Armory Sponsor