Armory Sponsor
Posted: 5/24/2016 9:10:57 AM EDT
|
Quoted:
Very cool Question: why does a 3 lug require ATF approval? ETA: are they still claiming their cans index at a second point along the muzzle of the device? I'd be interested in chopping that brake to a single or double chamber YHM has locked horns with the ATF over suppressors/muzzle accessories in the past. My guess is that they want to make damn sure that the ATF won't screw them. |
| I am glad to hear they are in production. As soon as my dealer can make one happen, I am all over it! I have a lot of rifles with YHM mounts and it prevents me from getting some rifle suppressors I think look good. Right now I have a Ti. Phantom (7.62), a M2 QD (5.56) and a Omega (Using YHM adapter) so the ability to add another rifle can to my collection without the worry of mounts is welcome. Plus I really like the looks and specs of this one too! |
|
Quoted:
YHM needs to make a big splash somewhere to stay relevant IMO. 5 years ago the phantom was the tits, but all these new companies are just dumping so many products onto the market that companies like YHM are falling behind. I would think this qualifies. Cutting weight, exterior redesign, and a modern 3 port brake |
|
Quoted:
I would think this qualifies. Cutting weight, exterior redesign, and a modern 3 port brake Quoted:
Quoted:
YHM needs to make a big splash somewhere to stay relevant IMO. 5 years ago the phantom was the tits, but all these new companies are just dumping so many products onto the market that companies like YHM are falling behind. I would think this qualifies. Cutting weight, exterior redesign, and a modern 3 port brake Bingo. The only complaint I've ever heard about YHM is the weight and ugly muzzle devices and this new can has addressed both to a large degree. |
Armory Sponsor



