Armory Sponsor
Posted: 2/2/2015 10:03:43 AM EDT
|
I've been debating this one for awhile and need some help. I would like to buy a AAC M-4 can for my Colt M-16A1. My understanding is that this is one of the better cans for my full auto application. While I do own a few 7.62 MG's and would like to suppress them as well, my first (conquest) if you will, is to have my 16 quitter. I feel that if I buy the bigger can I won't get as much suppression, db reduction as I would on the specific.223 can. I would like to suppress my MM23e/21e with one can for each cal. But lets stay with the original question.
Thanks |
|
A 7.62 can on 5.56 rifle will loose some db reduction compared to a 5.56 can on a 5.56 rifle and it will also be unnecessarily long, heavy and expensive. Putting a 2 lbs massive 7.62 suppressor on the end of a light weight 6-8lb M16 is kind of stupid IMO.
I guess this is exactly what I was trying to ask/say, but in adding to this question. How much db would I lose on the larger can on my M-16? I mean could one hear the dif or would only specometer crazy a$$ hearing machine be able to detect? |
|
You can look at some of the suppressor tests on youtube. It seems that both 7.62 & 5.56 are around 165 decibels unsuppressed, and 132 decibels suppressed. The numbers on the 5.56 through a 7.62 can don't change this much - usually less than one or two decibels.
There are also 7.62 cans that do as well as dedicated 5.56 cans - the Silencerco Specwar 7.62 is a very good multi-caliber can. It is longer, and a bit heavier, but it does it's job very well. Dedicated 5.56 cans are usually smaller & lighter than 7.62 cans, so you have to decide what is more important to you. Right now, there are a couple of new 7.62 cans on the market that I want to see tested before I'll buy a new rifle can - these are the Silencerco Omega and the Dead Air Sandman -L. The Omega is very light, and the Sandman videos out make it sound great, but I want some real sound testing done. Good luck in your search, Bob S. |
|
The 762 can will be heavier/longer than the 556 version of the same can.
The 762 will have more volume, so suppress better...but bigger bore compared to projectile, so suppress worse. -The bigger bore also gives some protection against baffle strikes -The bigger volume often gives a different/lower tone which may make it sound quieter or more pleasant |
|
Quoted:
The 762 can will be heavier/longer than the 556 version of the same can. The 762 will have more volume, so suppress better...but bigger bore compared to projectile, so suppress worse. -The bigger bore also gives some protection against baffle strikes -The bigger volume often gives a different/lower tone which may make it sound quieter or more pleasant ^^THIS^^....Nailed it. I have both 5.56 and 7.62 factory GemTech cans. When each is mounted on 5.56 weapons....the dB's are as close to equal as I can tell. Any discernible difference is in the "TONE" rather than the volume. The 7.62 can is a lower tone than the 5.56 can. If you can afford both....buy both. If not...the 7.62 can makes a fine suppressor for 5.56 ammo. |
|
Quoted:
A 7.62 can on 5.56 rifle will loose some db reduction compared to a 5.56 can on a 5.56 rifle and it will also be unnecessarily long, heavy and expensive. Putting a 2 lbs massive 7.62 suppressor on the end of a light weight 6-8lb M16 is kind of stupid IMO. I guess this is exactly what I was trying to ask/say, but in adding to this question. How much db would I lose on the larger can on my M-16? I mean could one hear the dif or would only specometer crazy a$$ hearing machine be able to detect? There is very little weight & length difference between a 7.62 & a 5.56 can. You probably won't be able to tell the difference in sound reduction with your ear, either. Don't buy anything lightweight for an FA application, and use a brake mount. |
Armory Sponsor
