Armory Sponsor
Posted: 1/7/2015 9:12:02 PM EDT
Think I'm in love. 
Model: SF Ryder 9-Ti Threads: 1/2-28 or M13.5X1 MSRP: $799.00 Launching: SHOT Show 2015 Specs: 9.5oz with piston 7.6" with piston Titanium tube, front plate and rear cap Stainless steel baffles 1.25" tube diameter Federal 147 Hydra Shock 131 dB Federal 124 FMJ American Eagle 131dB Cerakote Black, FDE or Grey Quoted:
Sneak Peek - SureFire Ryder 9 Another Look At The SureFire Ryder 9 Introducing the SureFire Ryder 9 Ti (link from above) |
|
Sneak Peek - SureFire Ryder 9 Introducing the SureFire Ryder 9 Ti (link from above) |
|
Quoted:
What happened with your Ryder 22? Also the choking comment had me dying, lol. Quoted:
Quoted:
Ill pass after my experience with the Ryder 22... And I choke pretty hard on the surefire dick considering I own 4 5.56 socom cans and am about to order a 7.62 mini. What happened with your Ryder 22? Also the choking comment had me dying, lol. First, pulling it out of the box was pretty cool, comes in a sized down surefire box, nice pouch included, and the take down tools. The can itself is relatively light, though a silencerco warlock is lighter and quieter. The stacked baffles don't seal very well allowing carbon to build up in the tube further plaguing disassembly.. The way the stainless thread insert locks into aluminum tube looks like its rather fragile and would present a problem over time and use. A gemtech outback is quieter at my ear, along with other people during a side by side demo. The 1/2x28 threads are barely .400" Deep, so now you have to use the tacky little stainless washer Surefire includes to put it on ANYTHING. It wouldnt seat 100% against the shoulder on a P22 thread adapter for me. Surefire just reduced MSRP and Dealer on the Ryder 22, I did buy one when they first came out, and was disappointed with the performance at the price. And unlike the rifle cans, this thing just does not ooze quality or is built like a brick shit house. I would probably end up trying the new 9mm because it is surefire. I am also looking forward to the new 300 Blackout specific surefire socom coming out in january. 
|
|
Quoted:
I was thinking the same thing. One of the Ultras and the FDE Ryder would look fantastic on my M&P. http://i59.tinypic.com/29vb9j9.jpg Quoted:
Quoted:
Bravo. Guess I have a excuse to scoop up one of those FDE X300 Ultra's. I was thinking the same thing. One of the Ultras and the FDE Ryder would look fantastic on my M&P. http://i59.tinypic.com/29vb9j9.jpg 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bravo. Guess I have a excuse to scoop up one of those FDE X300 Ultra's. I was thinking the same thing. One of the Ultras and the FDE Ryder would look fantastic on my M&P. http://i59.tinypic.com/29vb9j9.jpg https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/t31.0-8/10922410_978761538820096_6234347863404917453_o.jpg Man, that looks great! |
|
Quoted: http://i60.tinypic.com/ip3vyt.jpg Think I'm in love. Model: SF Ryder 9-Ti Threads: 1/2-28 or M13.5X1 MSRP: $799.00 Launching: SHOT Show 2015 Specs: 9.5oz with piston 7.6" with piston Titanium tube, front plate and rear cap Stainless steel baffles 1.25" tube diameter Federal 147 Hydra Shock 131 dB Federal 124 FMJ American Eagle 131dB Cerakote Black, FDE or Grey Quoted: Sneak Peek - SureFire Ryder 9 Another Look At The SureFire Ryder 9 Introducing the SureFire Ryder 9 Ti (link from above) |
|
If Garin's still here, I have a question.
Based on what I remember about SS's db tests on competitor cans, these seems a bit louder. Is that a function of the different ammo used, or was it done intentionally with some positive trades off in mind (like there is with rifle cans)? Thanks. |
|
Please don't tell me that. I just got my form 4 back for mine...
What are you hosting it on and what did you not like about it? Quoted:
Ill pass after my experience with the Ryder 22... And I choke pretty hard on the surefire dick considering I own 4 5.56 socom cans and am about to order a 7.62 mini. |
|
Quoted:
If Garin's still here, I have a question. Based on what I remember about SS's db tests on competitor cans, these seems a bit louder. Is that a function of the different ammo used, or was it done intentionally with some positive trades off in mind (like there is with rifle cans)? Thanks. I'd be interested as well |
|
Quoted: Please don't tell me that. I just got my form 4 back for mine... What are you hosting it on and what did you not like about it? Quoted: Please don't tell me that. I just got my form 4 back for mine... What are you hosting it on and what did you not like about it? Quoted: Ill pass after my experience with the Ryder 22... And I choke pretty hard on the surefire dick considering I own 4 5.56 socom cans and am about to order a 7.62 mini. He posted the reasons why on the first page of this thread.
|
|
We have been testing the Ryder 9Ti with a lot of ammo. 147 Hydro Shock was requested by several groups. We have results with AMU's load as low as 125 dB. We will be putting more data out. We do not do one sample and use that. It is months of testing and then put a ave. out.
On the SF Ryder 22-A it is a muzzle interface and pistols have a shorter threads in most cases than rifles do. The spacer is for cosmetics on rifles to cover up any exposed threads if you wanted to. |
|
Quoted:
We have been testing the Ryder 9Ti with a lot of ammo. 147 Hydro Shock was requested by several groups. We have results with AMU's load as low as 125 dB. We will be putting more data out. We do not do one sample and use that. It is months of testing and then put a ave. out. Thanks dude. Appreciate the clarification. |
|
Quoted:
Anyone know if this is rated for full auto (should be based on the materials used?) and if it's user-serviceable or a completely sealed can? Are taller pistol sights needed for this suppressor too or can you use standard sights? Also anyone know if they will offer a 3 lug adapter for the Ryder 9? In comparing the db ratings between this and the Octane 9, Both the Ryder 9 & Octane 9 seem to be the same length with only an 1/8" difference in diameter. Octane 9 says 30+ db reduction. So where does that put it in comparison to the Ryder 9 in sound reduction? |
|
Quoted:
Also anyone know if they will offer a 3 lug adapter for the Ryder 9? In comparing the db ratings between this and the Octane 9, Both the Ryder 9 & Octane 9 seem to be the same length with only an 1/8" difference in diameter. Octane 9 says 30+ db reduction. So where does that put it in comparison to the Ryder 9 in sound reduction? Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone know if this is rated for full auto (should be based on the materials used?) and if it's user-serviceable or a completely sealed can? Are taller pistol sights needed for this suppressor too or can you use standard sights? Also anyone know if they will offer a 3 lug adapter for the Ryder 9? In comparing the db ratings between this and the Octane 9, Both the Ryder 9 & Octane 9 seem to be the same length with only an 1/8" difference in diameter. Octane 9 says 30+ db reduction. So where does that put it in comparison to the Ryder 9 in sound reduction? SilencerCo puts the Octane9 at 128.7db |
|
Quoted: Both the Ryder 9 & Octane 9 seem to be the same length with only an 1/8" difference in diameter. Octane 9 says 30+ db reduction. So where does that put it in comparison to the Ryder 9 in sound reduction? In their Industry Comparison SWR was getting 159.24 dB avg unsuppressed using 147gr AE out of a USP 9 Results were: Octane 9: 126.83 dB Trident 9: 126.12 dB TiRant 9: 125.85 dB But you would need a head to head comparison to make valid performance comparisons. |
Armory Sponsor