Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
10/24/2004 7:09:49 PM EDT
Which one would you pick & why?  I was looking at a PTR91-A1 vs Congo style DSA FAL or the like.  Is one more reliable than the other, mag prices, etc?  

10/24/2004 7:11:30 PM EDT
[#1]
FAL all the way, IMHO.
10/24/2004 7:48:15 PM EDT
[#2]
Both are great rifles. The DSA mags will be $5 to 15 bucks and about the same for the G3 some are out there for 2 dollars. I would say both are very reliable...I do not own a PTR-91 but I have a HK91 and a DSA congo. The DSA is gas which is nice, and it is not as heavy as the G3. The DSA is a little more then the PTR-91 if that is a factor.

I like my HK91 over my DSA but that is after a few spendy add ons. But if you are talking which is better right out of the box PTR-91 vs. DSA I would have to go with the DSA FAL.

Chris
10/24/2004 8:14:39 PM EDT
[#3]
Both are great rifles, have both, wouldn't sell either. PTR is a great bang for the buck, PTR has a med-heavy barrel, FAL is standard. May make a difference if carried alot.

Bill
10/24/2004 8:41:00 PM EDT
[#4]
I have both also.

While I like the HK91 a lot, I don't even have to think before saying that, if I could have only one, I would pick the FAL.

10/24/2004 9:25:13 PM EDT
[#5]
Check out most overatted and underratted rifles of all times. G3 (HKs) have a lot of votes fore being the most overated rifle ever, and FAL has a lot of votes for being the most under-rated ever. As a FAL owner, my vote goes to the FAL hands down. For the money you get a much higher quality firearm.
10/24/2004 11:40:13 PM EDT
[#6]
I'm rather in love with the G3 ergonomics.  The grip is great, the balace tickles my pickle, and I get my cheek in the right spot every time.  Dig it.

QUite frankly, I dont think you could go wrong with a PTR91 or a DSA

- BG


EDIT:  Ummm... don't get a CETME...
10/25/2004 2:39:28 AM EDT
[#7]
Both are proven and realible combat rifles.  FAL mags seems to be just a bit more pentiful.  Have you handled the guns?  Which feels best to you?  Can you operate the weapons safety, mag release, op rod while still shouldered?  What assoceries do you plan on adding?

My .02 cents is for the FAL for it fits my needs.

CD
10/25/2004 9:53:46 AM EDT
[#8]
I have lots of experience with HK & CETME, none with FAL.

HK has my vote for most over-rated.  I will never own another one.

If possible, try shooting HK and FAL before buying, then you'll know what works best for you in terms of sights, balance, ergonomics, etc.

My next .308 will be either a M1A or FAL.  I haven't made the decision yet.


horse.gif
10/25/2004 9:58:09 AM EDT
[#9]
The ergonomics of the G3/HK91 SUCK in all ways IMHO.  Optics end up attrociously high above the bore line.  Recoil feels more stout to me than the FAL.

You may feel differently.
10/25/2004 5:34:03 PM EDT
[#10]
FAL fan here...


 - georgestrings
10/25/2004 6:50:40 PM EDT
[#11]
FAL all the way.  The G3 kicks like a mule.  The FAL is much more pleasant to shoot.
10/25/2004 7:30:06 PM EDT
[#12]
FAL.

Of course I would get a FAL because of other peoples suggestions.  Mags are cheap, and if you reload, you can easily to the brass of an FAL cuz it does not have a fluted chamber, like the G3 does.
10/26/2004 10:01:56 AM EDT
[#13]
The HK91/G3 is a rock-solid rifle, but the first time you clean it you'll wish you had taken your FAL to the range instead.
10/26/2004 12:28:44 PM EDT
[#14]
The FAL is slightly more ergonomic, but the 91/G3 has much better sights, is readily scoped or dot sighted with its claw mount, and is more accurate. The FAL's sights suck and the FAL's I've owned, were never great shooters and a couple were real turds. My HK 91's were on the level of the M1A's I've owned as far as accuracy goes. The flutes are a non issue to reloaders but you really do need the port buffer if you want to reload.
10/27/2004 6:57:47 AM EDT
[#15]
FAL!  I own a couple FAL's and I've shot enough G3's to know that I'll most likely never buy one.  Although they sure do look cool.
10/27/2004 6:17:12 PM EDT
[#16]
FAL enough said
10/27/2004 6:41:23 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
The FAL is slightly more ergonomic, but the 91/G3 has much better sights, is readily scoped or dot sighted with its claw mount, and is more accurate. The FAL's sights suck and the FAL's I've owned, were never great shooters and a couple were real turds. My HK 91's were on the level of the M1A's I've owned as far as accuracy goes. The flutes are a non issue to reloaders but you really do need the port buffer if you want to reload.



That's what I'm a bit concerned about; I'm spoiled with M1A sights already.  Does the DSA Para or OSW have improved sights over a base FAL?  Recommendations on improved/replacement sights for FAL?

Thanks for the feedback everyone; I was leaning towards a G3.  Didn't realize the overwhelming bias towards the FAL...
10/27/2004 7:24:56 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
The ergonomics of the G3/HK91 SUCK in all ways IMHO.  Optics end up attrociously high above the bore line.  Recoil feels more stout to me than the FAL.

You may feel differently.



+1.

The FAL is a dream to shoot, the HK/G3 is a PITA.
10/28/2004 5:30:36 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The ergonomics of the G3/HK91 SUCK in all ways IMHO.  Optics end up attrociously high above the bore line.  Recoil feels more stout to me than the FAL.

You may feel differently.



+1.

The FAL is a dream to shoot, the HK/G3 is a PITA.




+2

Never cared for the HK G3. Same as Lumpy, I hated the ergonomics, and the recoil seemed lighter on the FAL.
10/28/2004 2:16:18 PM EDT
[#20]
The best thing to do is get with someone with both rifles and shoot them to see what is best for YOU.  I enjoy both a great deal at the range.  The Hk/G3 style rifles really shoot nice...BUT so does the FAL...........DAMN that is hard to decide!
10/28/2004 2:25:51 PM EDT
[#21]
Everything I've heard says generic G-3s have horrible triggers (worse than most semi-auto battle rifles). I am looking in the market to go for a "real" semi-auto .308 (I've got a MAS 49/56, but that doesn't really count) and everything I've ever read says FALS are better in the long run. Again, it's what you like, but here's my opinion.
10/29/2004 10:11:55 PM EDT
[#22]
I liked the FAL, but I loved the PTR-91. Recoil is noticeably more stout though, enough to the point that I will be getting the buffer. I am afraid to get the collapsible stock for fear of what it would do to me.
10/30/2004 5:15:52 AM EDT
[#23]
Never fired an FAL, but I do have a HK91A3.

And yes I`m in love with it!

Also since its the A3 it has the HK telestock. Recoil is about the same.
10/30/2004 5:20:31 AM EDT
[#24]
I have both. I like the G3, but it is not as easy a shoot as the FAL. They have similar accuracy. The FAL ergonomics suit me (YMMV) better. Both have high maintainability rates: they're good-to-go most all the time. Recoil of a properly-tuned FAL is negligible compared to the G3.

I like my G3.
I carried my FAL for serious, across-the-pond, business. The proponent agnecy had both the FAL and the G3 available. Nuff said.
10/30/2004 10:54:07 AM EDT
[#25]
I've never seen or fired a FAL, Excuse the ignorance and I'm always willing to listen and learn new weapons. WHO makes the FAL? manufacture, contact, caliber? Links would be appreciated.

Thanks to all!

I do have a couple of PTR's and have always loved them and their simplicity of breakdown and repair and the ability to quickly make modifications. Scope mount sucks, Kickback will make you sore for a day or two. Reliability is excellent, Accuracy is excellent, NO gas feedback to "Shit where it eats". All together just a great design and price obviously can't be beat!
10/30/2004 10:57:35 AM EDT
[#26]
Fal's were originally made by FN.  Now their clone are made by just about everyone.  DSA is arguably the best in this country.  Caliber is also 308.  

check out: falfiles.com/forums
10/30/2004 11:08:29 AM EDT
[#27]
Beauty and versatility.........Whats not to like?



10/30/2004 12:27:25 PM EDT
[#28]
FAL.

As oft mentioned here, check out FALfiles for tons of information.
Armory Sponsor