Quote History Quoted:
Which doesn’t compute. Any 01 FFL can get nfa items. They just have to pay the $200. That’s why the have the sot, but a ffl can get items. Why don’t DD’s work the same?
View Quote
An FFL 01 allows you to commercially deal in firearms including NFA firearms....other than destructive devices.
The SOT payment on an 01 license removes the $200 per item transfer tax burden. To the best of my knowledge its technically not illegal to have commercial activity in NFA firearms (MG, SBR, SBS, Silencers, & AOW) as an 01 without a SOT. While its probably not practical to have inbound NFA transfers into your inventory at $200 each, I have come across 01 dealers over the years who have existing inventory of NFA firearms from when they paid their SOT, kept the FFL but let the SOT lapse and continue to deal in NFA firearms by selling off the existing NFA inventory in-State via a tax paid Form 4.
However, to commercially deal in destructive devices you need a different FFL license class (09 or 10). So its really not a SOT vs. non-SOT limitation, its a FFL license class limitation to do commercial activity in DDs. So if the BATFE/NFA branch believes the inbound DD transfer to you is for commercial activity it is technically their job to make sure you have the correct license class for that commercial firearm activity.
Remove the inter-State part of the equation and it would still be illegal for you with an 01 license to commercially deal in DDs via tax paid transfers. Say you as an 01 bought a dozen M203s from a in-State manufacturer and paid the $200 tax for each one with the plan to them up for sale to in-State residents. I assume the BATFE would probably deny those in-bound transfer requests as well. Its sort of no different if they believed me as a non-licensee was buying a selling NFA firearms without an FFL by just paying the tax on each one as I don't have the correct FFL license type. (which isn't too far fetched if say I was only dealing in transferable MGs without a license as the $200 tax cost is a rounding error)
Again to the best of my knowledge (and somebody can correct me if I am wrong on this account) its not against the GCA of 68 for a large bore DD to transfer to you inter-State (SOT or non-SOT) as its still "a firearm" and the 01 license clears the GCA inter-State transfer legal hurdle, but without the right DD FFL license type (09 or 10) its not legal for you to commercially deal in Destructive Devices.
In this case your 01 license sort of works like an 03 license (C&R) to allow the inter-State transfer to legally proceed. A regular Joe can't purchase C&R firearms inter-State and/or deal in C&R firearms. An FFL 03/C&R license holder can purchase C&R eligible firearms across State lines but an 03 license doesn't allow you to have commercial activity in C&R firearms. In this case a 03/C&R can purchase a Mosin and have it inter-State shipped to them for collecting purpose. However an 03/C&R license holder can't buy Mosin's, with the plan to resell or transfer them commercially with an 03/C&R license.
This is the argument my 01 dealer made when he convinced the NFA branch to approve his DD transfer as a personal use firearm and had to write them a letter affirming the transfer was for non-commercial purposes. This may be more complicated if your license isn't a sole prop as the burden to convince the NFA branch that your FFL corp is personally collecting a DD may be a bit more difficult. For my dealer his license and himself personally are one in the same entity and humans routinely both deal and collect firearms at the same time.
Th BATFE/NFA used to allow 01s one DD a year and defined dealing/commercial activity in DDs as "2 or more" in a year and some small maximum overall number. Now-a-days it appears their current definition for commercial activity in DDs requiring the correct FFL license type is "1 or more".