MAS-36. Hands down.
No 4 is nice, but IMO is seriously overrated. Though its built to a more modern spec, the rifle is a kludge job of different screws. To take the rifle apart without tearing up screwheads you need a lot of different drivers. The safety, though in a nice position, takes far too many parts to do what it does. The bolt does not disassemble without tools. Rim locking a common problem due to 303 British.
The magazine capacity is often cited as a bonus, but for all intents and purposes in WWII it wasn't a deciding factor. Troops weren't slamming 10 round mags in, they were feeding 2 strippers in. So instead of loading every 5 rounds you had double the reload time at 10.
No 4 had nice sights, but its not fast to increase decrease elevation.
The No. 4 is nothing but a PIP'ed Enfield from the 1880s. Easier to make, still an archaic design using rimmed cartridges. Basically, the British Mosin that they were too stubborn to get rid of until the FAL.