User Panel
I’ve been messing around with this kit. So far I found it to be way more comfortable than my old alice gear even though it weighs more. I think I may switch out the under armor yoke for a padded yoke. The other issue is where to place an ifak. I tried swapping out one of the gp/water bottle pouches for an ifak pouch but it seemed to affect the balance.
Attached File Attached File Attached File Yoke Hip pad |
|
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars." - Unknown
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: I’ve been messing around with this kit. So far I found it to be way more comfortable than my old alice gear even though it weighs more. I think I may switch out the under armor yoke for a padded yoke. The other issue is where to place an ifak. I tired swapping out one of the gp/water bottle pouches for an ifak pouch but it seemed to affect the balance. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/5A6CE631-BEE4-44F3-8750-5A03190E092E_jpe-2538565.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/E78AE650-29E2-4A52-9B00-DEAD167913D3_jpe-2538566.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/C2F34D06-E3BE-41EF-BEC1-A1DA88D90F1B_jpe-2538567.JPG Yoke Hip pad View Quote I have been eyeballing this exact pad since stumbling in here. I keep getting hung up on: Is it too hot/absorbent? How does the sizing work out? But I've added this to a cart multiple times and keep walking away each time. |
|
|
The way it rides I haven’t had any issues with over absorption and I sweat a lot. I did a tab with a friend in the spring but I don’t remember the hip pad being overly soaked.
For sizing I have a 34ish inch waist and I initially bought a medium and it was too big. Ended up with a small and it fit perfectly. Measure your hips point to point around the back to get the right size. Ideally the pad should not go much past the points of your hips. I have a size medium pad that is unused if anyone is looking for one. ETA…One other note…I hate velcro so I chose to remove velcro from the water bottle pouches and opted for UW Gear pouches on the right hand side of the belt. |
|
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars." - Unknown
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: I’ve been messing around with this kit. So far I found it to be way more comfortable than my old alice gear even though it weighs more. I think I may switch out the under armor yoke for a padded yoke. The other issue is where to place an ifak. I tried swapping out one of the gp/water bottle pouches for an ifak pouch but it seemed to affect the balance. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/5A6CE631-BEE4-44F3-8750-5A03190E092E_jpe-2538565.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/E78AE650-29E2-4A52-9B00-DEAD167913D3_jpe-2538566.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/C2F34D06-E3BE-41EF-BEC1-A1DA88D90F1B_jpe-2538567.JPG Yoke Hip pad View Quote Put one of the closed magazine pouches on the Left side of the belt, 2nd magazine pouch from the end. Not the first one. Put your IFAK in there in one of these: https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/sarma-tst-pull-out-ifak-insert/55879 Tactical Tailor makes one too, but the Varusteleka ones work better. This is why I prefer triple mag magazine pouches on belt kit btw. Because you end up using one for your IFAK, and you can always cinch them down to just hold 2 magazines if you want that. (On a side note. I wish that UW would make triple magazine pouches designed for belt kit. With little loops on the side to attach cinch-down bungies. And 2 columns of MOLLE as an option on the sides of the pouches to attach other pouches. We wouldn't have to buy British gear if someone here in the US started making british compatible kit. I know Diz is working on getting something up and running. But hey. I just figure magazine pouches would be an easy thing to spin up as an option. And I like UW's stuff, especially his pull tabs.) Alternatively, you can get a small fanny pack (helikon makes a good one in good camo patterns that isn't much. They have them on amazon.) and run your IFAK in there, in front of your hips or spun around and resting on top of your rear pouches if you aren't carrying your ruck. You can also put E&E bits in the second pocket. |
|
|
"People don't think Cola Warrior be like it is but it do..." - George Washington
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: For sizing I have a 34ish inch waist and I initially bought a medium and it was too big. Ended up with a small and it fit perfectly. Measure your hips point to point around the back to get the right size. Ideally the pad should not go much past the points of your hips. I have a size medium pad that is unused if anyone is looking for one. View Quote Someone who's wanting to try this stuff out should pick this up. You can get surplus yokes and pouches you need here in the USA. The belt is what's hard to find here in the USA..... |
|
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Put one of the closed magazine pouches on the Left side of the belt, 2nd magazine pouch from the end. Not the first one. Put your IFAK in there in one of these: https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/sarma-tst-pull-out-ifak-insert/55879 Tactical Tailor makes one too, but the Varusteleka ones work better. This is why I prefer triple mag magazine pouches on belt kit btw. Because you end up using one for your IFAK, and you can always cinch them down to just hold 2 magazines if you want that. (On a side note. I wish that UW would make triple magazine pouches designed for belt kit. With little loops on the side to attach cinch-down bungies. And 2 columns of MOLLE as an option on the sides of the pouches to attach other pouches. We wouldn't have to buy British gear if someone here in the US started making british compatible kit. I know Diz is working on getting something up and running. But hey. I just figure magazine pouches would be an easy thing to spin up as an option. And I like UW's stuff, especially his pull tabs.) Alternatively, you can get a small fanny pack (helikon makes a good one in good camo patterns that isn't much. They have them on amazon.) and run your IFAK in there, in front of your hips or spun around and resting on top of your rear pouches if you aren't carrying your ruck. You can also put E&E bits in the second pocket. View Quote That’s awesome I wasn’t aware of that. Bookmarked for when they are in stock. Love Varusteleka. The water bottle pouches came from them. |
|
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars." - Unknown
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: That’s awesome I wasn’t aware of that. Bookmarked for when they are in stock. Love Varusteleka. The water bottle pouches came from them. View Quote Oh yea, Varusteleka is legit good people. They don't charge much for overseas shipping either, unlike everyone else. And it gets here fast. They have british belt kit compatible pouches in stock off and on. The Dutch MOLLE stuff works with this too btw. They have Dutch surplus utility pouches for $10 each right now. If you're rocking the M81 hotness, those dutch pouches match up pretty well. The Dutch MOLLE pouches fit 3 AR magazines too. That IFAK insert is exactly what you are looking for. It's almost a must with this kind of setup. |
|
|
Yup. If you haven’t tried their wool long johns they are the shit and usually way cheaper than the Smartwool etc.
|
|
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars." - Unknown
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: The way it rides I haven’t had any issues with over absorption and I sweat a lot. I did a tab with a friend in the spring but I don’t remember the hip pad being overly soaked. For sizing I have a 34ish inch waist and I initially bought a medium and it was too big. Ended up with a small and it fit perfectly. Measure your hips point to point around the back to get the right size. Ideally the pad should not go much past the points of your hips. I have a size medium pad that is unused if anyone is looking for one. ETA…One other note…I hate velcro so I chose to remove velcro from the water bottle pouches and opted for UW Gear pouches on the right hand side of the belt. View Quote Thank you for the insight! I appreciate it. Their sizing suggestions and measurements just weren't jiving with the suggested fit (hip to hip) and my PALS row counts from the pictures. |
|
|
Originally Posted By cap6888: I always try to incorporate one mag in an open top/fast mag/ready mag configuration. Plus I like the idea of starting off with a D60. If things go hot, it gives you some more time to lay down fire to maneuver. View Quote Do you want to carry the gun with a D-60 in it? You are going to slow down the speed you can move the rifle to target. I can see the appeal in the availability to have a D-60 for a break contact drill. A 40 might be a better compromise. |
|
Preferred Pronoun: Space Lord Mutherfucker
|
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal: Do you want to carry the gun with a D-60 in it? You are going to slow down the speed you can move the rifle to target. I can see the appeal in the availability to have a D-60 for a break contact drill. A 40 might be a better compromise. View Quote Meh, weight is negligible. Compared to a loaded thirty rounder, it’s about 1.5 pound more. It’s not like the difference between a SAW with a 100 round nutsack versus a 200 round box. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: I’ve been messing around with this kit. So far I found it to be way more comfortable than my old alice gear even though it weighs more. I think I may switch out the under armor yoke for a padded yoke. The other issue is where to place an ifak. I tried swapping out one of the gp/water bottle pouches for an ifak pouch but it seemed to affect the balance. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/5A6CE631-BEE4-44F3-8750-5A03190E092E_jpe-2538565.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/E78AE650-29E2-4A52-9B00-DEAD167913D3_jpe-2538566.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/189806/C2F34D06-E3BE-41EF-BEC1-A1DA88D90F1B_jpe-2538567.JPG Yoke Hip pad View Quote I would replace one of the mag pouch contents with one of those mag pouch med inserts, personally, if you were looking for a place for med. |
|
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: This is my attempt to use the buttpack, which I think works better overall. Alot of people say utility pouches are better. It's all personal preference. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: This is my attempt to use the buttpack, which I think works better overall. Alot of people say utility pouches are better. It's all personal preference. Good looking kit! So, the PLCE kit I’m building will have a buttpack as opposed to my other one that is just utility pouches. While it is a personal preference, I’m sure there is a more reasonable explanation…I just don’t know the origins of the British design. I do think the British PLCE concept balances easier than the typical ALICE/LCE-type system. You really need to focus on your load bearing strategy and balance more with the standard LCE concept. The yoke and suspension on the British system is more forgiving IMHO. But, why buttpack over a couple extra utility pouches? The traditional buttpack was a great way to carry additional sustainment gear if you have to drop your ruck. The size helps for bulkier items and if your belt system is fitted properly, it’s essentially a lumbar pack. The British utility pouches are smaller, which restricts bulkier items. The benefit is a better balanced “system”. I also think that with the capability to combine and add the two sustainment pouches from the Bergen pack and make a pseudo assault pack, you and address the bulkier items and keep your belt kit more suited to other field necessities. Six one way, half a dozen the other way. I’ll get a chance to do a side by side when my MOLLE hippo pad shows up… Forgot to add, I’m a little less concerned about a buttpack-sized pouch with my utility pouch setup. I found that the Eagle Industries Yute pack fits perfectly on the MOLLE short-backed Bergen and can quickly be detached and use as a patrol/E&E pack with those larger essentials… Originally Posted By RIFLEMANIV: I’ve been messing around with this kit. So far I found it to be way more comfortable than my old alice gear even though it weighs more. I think I may switch out the under armor yoke for a padded yoke. The other issue is where to place an ifak. I tried swapping out one of the gp/water bottle pouches for an ifak pouch but it seemed to affect the balance. Looks great! So, the Jay Jay’s setup is a little different. Both of the 3xmag pouches are on the left and it has a large “commander’s admin” pouch on the right. I’m likely going to end up with a med insert tray (I have something at home) and the Varusteleka one looks pretty decent. I just need to decide on using one of the mag pouches or making room in the large admin pouch. All the Jay Jay’s pouches have webbing on the side, so my plan is to just put a CAT on each side for access. I’m using the sewn-on pouches for my Jay Jay’s rig and while it limits I’ll be building a similar rig on a Jay Jay’s MOLLE hippo belt, so I’ll have more flexibility with pouch selections. Originally Posted By Ex_Sanguine_Nation: I have been eyeballing this exact pad since stumbling in here. I keep getting hung up on: Is it too hot/absorbent? I can’t speak to the pad above, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised with the Jay Jay’s pad. It doesn’t absorb sweat and drain well. Hot is relative to the user, but the location is less noticeable than most chest rigs that trap heat. My concern was more on minimizing absorption and this does quite well. Sizing is important. With most battle belts, you have gear creeping around to the front for easy access. With the PLCE kit concept, the main pouches and hippo pad shouldn’t go much further forward than your hip joints. When fitted properly there’s very little interference with running, squatting/kneeling, or crawling in the prone. Originally Posted By HeavyMetal: Do you want to carry the gun with a D-60 in it? You are going to slow down the speed you can move the rifle to target. I can see the appeal in the availability to have a D-60 for a break contact drill. A 40 might be a better compromise. A shorter profile would be better for patrolling and while I haven’t thought much about doing it with a D60, it’s not a bad idea. Our security guys operated with a D60 inserted and 30’s for their combat load. The D60 provided them less to worry about during initial engagements or if they needed to break contact quickly. ROCK6 |
|
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By ROCK6: Sizing is important. With most battle belts, you have gear creeping around to the front for easy access. With the PLCE kit concept, the main pouches and hippo pad shouldn’t go much further forward than your hip joints. When fitted properly there’s very little interference with running, squatting/kneeling, or crawling in the prone. View Quote That's the trick - finding the right size with the desired features. I don't mind if the 4 utility pouches are sewn on, but I want the wings to be PALS so I can choose the ammunition pouches I like. I don't mind if it's all PALS, but I want to make sure it can take the roll pin buckle as I want fast and easy re-sizing. It's just a lot of going back and forth trying to figure out which one will be the best compromise since I am not finding exactly it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ex_Sanguine_Nation: That's the trick - finding the right size with the desired features. I don't mind if the 4 utility pouches are sewn on, but I want the wings to be PALS so I can choose the ammunition pouches I like. I don't mind if it's all PALS, but I want to make sure it can take the roll pin buckle as I want fast and easy re-sizing. It's just a lot of going back and forth trying to figure out which one will be the best compromise since I am not finding exactly it. View Quote Yeah I get the idea of having MOLLE on the wings, I can make do with how the sewn on kit is set up, but I would almost prefer the option of swapping out the Commander's Admin Pouch with two 3xmag pouches for exactly the purpose of adding a medical insert. I have the Aussi "plastic" cobra buckle and it's still pretty flexible with sizing, just very fast to open up for air or quick on/off. I didn't think I would like it, but it's not too bad. The challenge is daily weather changes in the spring and fall where you may have to add an insulation and outer layer in the morning and then pack them away at noon; you want an easy way to adjust your belt circumference by a few inches! ROCK6 |
|
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By ROCK6: So, the PLCE kit I’m building will have a buttpack as opposed to my other one that is just utility pouches. While it is a personal preference, I’m sure there is a more reasonable explanation…I just don’t know the origins of the British design. I do think the British PLCE concept balances easier than the typical ALICE/LCE-type system. You really need to focus on your load bearing strategy and balance more with the standard LCE concept. The yoke and suspension on the British system is more forgiving IMHO. But, why buttpack over a couple extra utility pouches? The traditional buttpack was a great way to carry additional sustainment gear if you have to drop your ruck. The size helps for bulkier items and if your belt system is fitted properly, it’s essentially a lumbar pack. The British utility pouches are smaller, which restricts bulkier items. The benefit is a better balanced “system”. I also think that with the capability to combine and add the two sustainment pouches from the Bergen pack and make a pseudo assault pack, you and address the bulkier items and keep your belt kit more suited to other field necessities. Six one way, half a dozen the other way. I’ll get a chance to do a side by side when my MOLLE hippo pad shows up… View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ROCK6: So, the PLCE kit I’m building will have a buttpack as opposed to my other one that is just utility pouches. While it is a personal preference, I’m sure there is a more reasonable explanation…I just don’t know the origins of the British design. I do think the British PLCE concept balances easier than the typical ALICE/LCE-type system. You really need to focus on your load bearing strategy and balance more with the standard LCE concept. The yoke and suspension on the British system is more forgiving IMHO. But, why buttpack over a couple extra utility pouches? The traditional buttpack was a great way to carry additional sustainment gear if you have to drop your ruck. The size helps for bulkier items and if your belt system is fitted properly, it’s essentially a lumbar pack. The British utility pouches are smaller, which restricts bulkier items. The benefit is a better balanced “system”. I also think that with the capability to combine and add the two sustainment pouches from the Bergen pack and make a pseudo assault pack, you and address the bulkier items and keep your belt kit more suited to other field necessities. Six one way, half a dozen the other way. I’ll get a chance to do a side by side when my MOLLE hippo pad shows up… Yea, I prefer the buttpacks too. I want to be able to carry a poncho, poncho liner, some cordage, and some food in my buttpack as the minimum. Can't really do all that with the utility pouches. Originally Posted By ROCK6:Forgot to add, I’m a little less concerned about a buttpack-sized pouch with my utility pouch setup. I found that the Eagle Industries Yute pack fits perfectly on the MOLLE short-backed Bergen and can quickly be detached and use as a patrol/E&E pack with those larger essentials… I have a Hill People Gear Tarahumara that I can throw on the back of my pack. Pull that off with more sustainment stuff and water. Same idea. |
|
|
Many interesting responses.
|
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: That brings up another great thing. British style smocks. #HeartEmoji View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Originally Posted By lew: Either term is used. "Cape Carrier" was the official terminology long ago. The MTP poncho roll is a nice, simple affair. Check fleabay, as I've seen some from stateside sellers. I keep my MTP smock in mine. That combo goes with me for any roadtrip or bush excursion. Keeps the smock from unnecessary wear, and I can easily clip the ensemble to my battle belt suspenders so that it rides on the canteen pouches. There's enough room to add a poncho roll or sweater, in addition to the smock. Making your own poncho roll would be a simple endeavor if one is so inclined. That brings up another great thing. British style smocks. #HeartEmoji Speaking of Brit smocks and those they inspired, while I've a Flecktarn Gore-Tex Poncho, I gave both my Fleck- and Wustetarn cotton jackets the same waterproofing treatment as I did the MTP smock. No need for the Gore-Tex anymore, and the hooded jackets are way softer. |
|
"What is socialism? The most difficult and tortuous way to progress from capitalism to capitalism." -Stated at an intel conference, East Berlin, Oct. 1988
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -H.L. Mencken |
Originally Posted By lew: Speaking of Brit smocks and those they inspired, while I've a Flecktarn Gore-Tex Poncho, I gave both my Fleck- and Wustetarn cotton jackets the same waterproofing treatment as I did the MTP smock. No need for the Gore-Tex anymore, and the hooded jackets are way softer. View Quote What waterproofing treatment are you using? |
|
|
Originally Posted By joeviterbo: They are located near brecon garrison, in Wales, where infantry school Is located. The mountains around are a very difficult training area, where also early SAS selection happens, the "Hills phase". View Quote Come to the Western US and we'll show you what difficult mountains look like. Also, do you have any leads on British DPM and Desert DPM smocks? I want one at least to go with my MTP smock. |
|
"What is socialism? The most difficult and tortuous way to progress from capitalism to capitalism." -Stated at an intel conference, East Berlin, Oct. 1988
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -H.L. Mencken |
Originally Posted By cap6888: What waterproofing treatment are you using? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By cap6888: Originally Posted By lew: Speaking of Brit smocks and those they inspired, while I've a Flecktarn Gore-Tex Poncho, I gave both my Fleck- and Wustetarn cotton jackets the same waterproofing treatment as I did the MTP smock. No need for the Gore-Tex anymore, and the hooded jackets are way softer. What waterproofing treatment are you using? Star Brite. Get it off slamazon. I'm on my second bottle. I've used it on cotton, poly/cotton blends, canvas, nylon and leather. Put simply: it works. |
|
"What is socialism? The most difficult and tortuous way to progress from capitalism to capitalism." -Stated at an intel conference, East Berlin, Oct. 1988
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -H.L. Mencken |
Originally Posted By lew: Star Brite. Get it off slamazon. I'm on my second bottle. I've used it on cotton, poly/cotton blends, canvas, nylon and leather. Put simply: it works. View Quote Hmmm. Think it would work on a backpack? I know there would still be water ingress from the zippers, but I’m looking to repell water from getting caught in the rain on a hit or something to that effect. |
|
|
Originally Posted By lew: Come to the Western US and we'll show you what difficult mountains look like. Also, do you have any leads on British DPM and Desert DPM smocks? I want one at least to go with my MTP smock. View Quote Good place to order from too. Shipping is cheap. https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/british-cs95-windproof-smock-desert-dpm-surplus/20004 https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/british-cs95-windproof-smock-dpm-surplus/29501 |
|
|
We are in the middle of a Communist Revolution in the USA.
There is no voting our way out of this. |
Originally Posted By AIWB: Hmmm. Think it would work on a backpack? I know there would still be water ingress from the zippers, but I’m looking to repell water from getting caught in the rain on a hit or something to that effect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AIWB: Originally Posted By lew: Star Brite. Get it off slamazon. I'm on my second bottle. I've used it on cotton, poly/cotton blends, canvas, nylon and leather. Put simply: it works. Hmmm. Think it would work on a backpack? I know there would still be water ingress from the zippers, but I’m looking to repell water from getting caught in the rain on a hit or something to that effect. @AIWB Make sure you use the right one. The website says: Star brite Waterproofing is compatible with most quality outdoor fabrics including; nylon, canvas, finished leather, and acrylics. However, some economy materials like polyester and urethane-backed fabrics are not compatible with most solvents, so please check the material before use. Also note that solvent-based products can affect the adhesive glue used on some carpeting, and can further depreciate heavily sun damaged fabric. Star brite offers a solvent-free formula, 'SeaSafe Waterproofing' as an odorless alternative. |
|
We are in the middle of a Communist Revolution in the USA.
There is no voting our way out of this. |
Originally Posted By cap6888: What waterproofing treatment are you using? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By cap6888: Originally Posted By lew: Speaking of Brit smocks and those they inspired, while I've a Flecktarn Gore-Tex Poncho, I gave both my Fleck- and Wustetarn cotton jackets the same waterproofing treatment as I did the MTP smock. No need for the Gore-Tex anymore, and the hooded jackets are way softer. What waterproofing treatment are you using? If the item is a pack, or an outer shell, I spray the outside. If the item is cotton/fleece/wool, etc. I use a wash-in type of waterproofing, and not a spray. For example, when laundering my Austrian milsurp Gore-Tex field jacket I use a specific GT-compatible laundering detergent and DWR on the outside; when laundering my very similar USGI NyCo Field jacket (no GoreTex) I launder it with Woolite and use wash-in waterproofing. Amazon Nikwax Store Tutorial Some observations: (1) A properly laundered and "waterproofed" garment is no substitute for a dedicated rain garment. (2) I suggest most any pack can leak to some degree, particularly those with exposed zippers and/or lots of "sew-throughs" as found on packs with PALS webbing attached. There are ways to greatly reduce such "leakage", a simple but laborious process. |
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Yea, I prefer the buttpacks too. I want to be able to carry a poncho, poncho liner, some cordage, and some food in my buttpack as the minimum. Can't really do all that with the utility pouches. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Yea, I prefer the buttpacks too. I want to be able to carry a poncho, poncho liner, some cordage, and some food in my buttpack as the minimum. Can't really do all that with the utility pouches. I’m trying to make the “utility pouches” concept work and I have some smaller tarps that will work, but there’s no way you’re getting a poncho liner in one of those pouches! The Velocity Systems butt pack isn’t really that big and a poncho liner would likely consume the whole compartment, but you can add in insulation layers, wind shirt and a small poncho or tarp system. Originally Posted By marnsdorff: As for adjusting your belt, you could also go with an oldschool ALICE belt extender. You could make one super cheap, even one that is adjustable for how long you want it to be. Kinda like the one below, but with the same buckles you are using on your belt kit. https://isteam.wsimg.com/ip/87d055e5-2890-11e4-9af8-f04da2075117/ols/1634_original/:/rs=w:600,h:600 Funny you posted this extended. I used one way back in the day when temps fluctuated because it was a PITA to manually adjust the old LBE pistol belt! In fact, I have a battle belt from EMDOM, and I had them make me a similar extender with their buckle system Originally Posted By joeviterbo: https://images2.imgbox.com/7e/64/PqrJKHaL_o.jpg Thanks for this photo, I didn't even look to see if the divider can be positioned like that; the way it arrived is that it's "split" lengthwise with the divider... I'm working my way around the belt kit...left to right, haven't really filled out my admin pouch yet, it's not something I've used in the past on my Line-two kit. Most of my admin kit was kept in my BDU/ACU cargo pockets... Originally Posted By joeviterbo: This is the one i use. mostly reserve training (mostly medical), some SAR training, LARPing. It is a 2nd hand sewn altogether Dragon Supplies Assault Rig, Commander pouch variant. It is an old pic, now it has also shock cord on the utilities. Nice setup, same as my Jay Jays. I'm building a second one (with some Velocity Systems jungle pouches) on a MOLLE Jay Jay's hippo belt. I have the slimmer six-point MOLLE yoke; got to say, it stabilizes very well. I like your mods you mentioned ROCK6 |
|
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Thanks for the info Lew.
For adding a poncho liner, what about a “bum roll” pouch? Or for that matter, this might be a good way to incorporate a Molle Waist pack. If it just held a woobie, it might compress enough between a pack and the utility pouch shelf to be comfortable. Or since it isn’t really a lot of weight, maybe extend the belt and wrap it around the outer edge of the utility pouches. Although it would make your ass end bigger. Just thinking out loud here. |
|
|
From ROCK6: "Funny you posted this extende[r]. I used one way back in the day when temps fluctuated because it was a PITA to manually adjust the old LBE pistol belt! In fact, I have a battle belt from EMDOM, and I had them make me a similar extender with their buckle system..."
I've heard the ALICE "Extender" referred to as a "Kovatch Clip", but no matter. Still around; search "pistol belt extender". Seen them in both styles of plastic GI pistol belt buckles, and in various lengths. As noted, highly useful when donning/doffing heavy outer garments. It's possible to make these in most any length desired with a couple of appropriate belt buckles, a couple or three appropriate plastic tri-glide buckles, and a longer-than-you think-necessary length of webbing. No sewing required, and if user/maker is clever, can have a fairly wide adjustment range. |
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By cap6888: Thanks for the info Lew. For adding a poncho liner, what about a “bum roll” pouch? Or for that matter, this might be a good way to incorporate a Molle Waist pack. If it just held a woobie, it might compress enough between a pack and the utility pouch shelf to be comfortable. Or since it isn’t really a lot of weight, maybe extend the belt and wrap it around the outer edge of the utility pouches. Although it would make your ass end bigger. Just thinking out loud here. View Quote You can actually cram two poncho liners in the MOLLE waist pack, I got one hanging from the MOLLE medium ruck we picked up earlier in the year. The MOLLE waist pack is actually pretty freaking giant. If you're running a butt pack, you can just roll up the poncho liner and slide it under the lid top straps. If you don't have a butt pack, it might be the perfect fit for a little extra 1" webbing and a couple fastex buckles. You could lash it to the belt, pouches, or even the yoke straps or suspenders. |
|
|
I have a lot to learn about this system of load-carriage.
From what I understand, the pouches on the rear of the belt (those supporting the pack) must retain their shape in order to support the pack when the pack is present. Adding to or subtracting from such rear "shelf" pouches might be problematic for proper pack support, the weight of the pack supported by "solid' "shelf" pouches mounted to a very good load bearing waistbelt. Or do I have this wrong? |
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By ROCK6: I’m trying to make the “utility pouches” concept work and I have some smaller tarps that will work, but there’s no way you’re getting a poncho liner in one of those pouches! The Velocity Systems butt pack isn’t really that big and a poncho liner would likely consume the whole compartment, but you can add in insulation layers, wind shirt and a small poncho or tarp system. View Quote That's why I like the buttpack. I have a Bushcraft Outfitters multicam poncho that's smaller and lighter than the USGI ones, and a poncho liner that uses thinsulate insulation, which, again, is smaller and lighter. I can get both in the butt pack with room for a little more. Though it doesn't leave MUCH room - which is why I'm looking at those british poncho rolls. I'd LIKE to be able to put my poncho and a HPG Serape on the load, along with a day of food and a handful of other stuff (booboo kit and such) |
|
|
Originally Posted By raf: I have a lot to learn about this system of load-carriage. From what I understand, the pouches on the rear of the belt (those supporting the pack) must retain their shape in order to support the pack when the pack is present. Adding to or subtracting from such rear "shelf" pouches might be problematic for proper pack support, the weight of the pack supported by "solid' "shelf" pouches mounted to a very good load bearing waistbelt. Or do I have this wrong? View Quote This was covered in the posts above. Basically, yes, you have it right. But because of what you carry in there, it doesn't really matter. |
|
|
I was stationed in Panama when we still had troops there and have been to Jungle school three times. The LCE system works well in the jungle.
Jungles are hot, and your body needs to breathe. Think water and ammo. Take only what you need and nothing else. Panama was very thick dense triple canopy jungle and very hot. H harness suspenders, belt, ammo pouches, water, buttpack with socks, powder, tshirt and a MRE. Rucksack: Outer pockets; jungle hammock, space blanket, poncho and poncho liner. Strobe light, heat tabs, and other essential stuff. 2qt and e tool strapped to the sides Inside ruck: change of BDU’s. More socks, MRE’s, and anything else you needed. |
|
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: That's why I like the buttpack. I have a Bushcraft Outfitters multicam poncho that's smaller and lighter than the USGI ones, and a poncho liner that uses thinsulate insulation, which, again, is smaller and lighter. I can get both in the butt pack with room for a little more. Though it doesn't leave MUCH room - which is why I'm looking at those british poncho rolls. I'd LIKE to be able to put my poncho and a HPG Serape on the load, along with a day of food and a handful of other stuff (booboo kit and such) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: That's why I like the buttpack. I have a Bushcraft Outfitters multicam poncho that's smaller and lighter than the USGI ones, and a poncho liner that uses thinsulate insulation, which, again, is smaller and lighter. I can get both in the butt pack with room for a little more. Though it doesn't leave MUCH room - which is why I'm looking at those british poncho rolls. I'd LIKE to be able to put my poncho and a HPG Serape on the load, along with a day of food and a handful of other stuff (booboo kit and such) I have all the same and plan to do a little experimentation. While not multicam, I do have an OD Kifaru Scout butt pack and the Eagle Industries (tan/coyote-ish) buttpack, but with are larger than Velocity Systems. I also want to compare it to the Mersh buttpack and see how things fit. Originally Posted By bubba497h2: I was stationed in Panama when we still had troops there and have been to Jungle school three times. The LCE system works well in the jungle. Jungles are hot, and your body needs to breathe. Think water and ammo. Take only what you need and nothing else. Panama was very thick dense triple canopy jungle and very hot. H harness suspenders, belt, ammo pouches, water, buttpack with socks, powder, tshirt and a MRE. Rucksack: Outer pockets; jungle hammock, space blanket, poncho and poncho liner. Strobe light, heat tabs, and other essential stuff. 2qt and e tool strapped to the sides Inside ruck: change of BDU’s. More socks, MRE’s, and anything else you needed. Not much has really changed except for materials, but this is always good to hear from those who’ve done it. I never got a slot for Jungle School, but spent several months in South America as part of a ODA task force and our entry/exit point was Panama. Ironically, I had switched to using a two-piece Tactical Tailor MAV over my LCE stuff as our jungle environment was mostly doing helicopter patrols (it was an observer mission), and we were living in a compound that was at a higher elevation and the headwater area of the Amazon basin. I found that if I lowered it down my chest, it kind of served as the British PLCE without the preferred waist belt for stability and heavier loads. That said, it wasn’t too stifling, and being open in the front, you could open it up when flying to get cooled down pretty quick. I think your highlight of the hammock shouldn’t go unnoticed. I’m a hammock backpacker, and I would never venture into a jungle environment with out a hammock system. I recall hiking down to a waterfall one morning by myself and simply stopping on the trail and observing the surroundings. Everything was moving! Insects, spiders, lizards, frogs, snakes, birds…an extremely active area. Yeah, if I’m going to catch a few zzz’s, I’ll be hanging a hammock (and using a rain fly in the rainy season). Thanks for the feedback! ROCK6 |
|
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By bubba497h2: I was stationed in Panama when we still had troops there and have been to Jungle school three times. The LCE system works well in the jungle. Jungles are hot, and your body needs to breathe. Think water and ammo. Take only what you need and nothing else. Panama was very thick dense triple canopy jungle and very hot. H harness suspenders, belt, ammo pouches, water, buttpack with socks, powder, tshirt and a MRE. Rucksack: Outer pockets; jungle hammock, space blanket, poncho and poncho liner. Strobe light, heat tabs, and other essential stuff. 2qt and e tool strapped to the sides Inside ruck: change of BDU’s. More socks, MRE’s, and anything else you needed. View Quote If this would be your choice of approaching patrols in hot humid weather then the velocity jungle kit would be a good choice. Same concept, uodated materials. |
|
|
Never went anywhere without my hammock and poncho. Ants were a major issue in Panama. There would be any trails up to 18 inches wide and they would crawl over you if you were in their path. Only thing I was worried about in the jungle was the frogs (very poisonous) and African killer bees, and black palm cause that shit hurt. Gloves are friend.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By ROCK6: I have all the same and plan to do a little experimentation. While not multicam, I do have an OD Kifaru Scout butt pack and the Eagle Industries (tan/coyote-ish) buttpack, but with are larger than Velocity Systems. I also want to compare it to the Mersh buttpack and see how things fit. Not much has really changed except for materials, but this is always good to hear from those who’ve done it. I never got a slot for Jungle School, but spent several months in South America as part of a ODA task force and our entry/exit point was Panama. Ironically, I had switched to using a two-piece Tactical Tailor MAV over my LCE stuff as our jungle environment was mostly doing helicopter patrols (it was an observer mission), and we were living in a compound that was at a higher elevation and the headwater area of the Amazon basin. I found that if I lowered it down my chest, it kind of served as the British PLCE without the preferred waist belt for stability and heavier loads. That said, it wasn’t too stifling, and being open in the front, you could open it up when flying to get cooled down pretty quick. I think your highlight of the hammock shouldn’t go unnoticed. I’m a hammock backpacker, and I would never venture into a jungle environment with out a hammock system. I recall hiking down to a waterfall one morning by myself and simply stopping on the trail and observing the surroundings. Everything was moving! Insects, spiders, lizards, frogs, snakes, birds…an extremely active area. Yeah, if I’m going to catch a few zzz’s, I’ll be hanging a hammock (and using a rain fly in the rainy season). Thanks for the feedback! ROCK6 View Quote HPG has a nifty buttpack-like thing, too. |
|
|
Originally Posted By bubba497h2: Never went anywhere without my hammock and poncho. Ants were a major issue in Panama. There would be any trails up to 18 inches wide and they would crawl over you if you were in their path. Only thing I was worried about in the jungle was the frogs (very poisonous) and African killer bees, and black palm cause that shit hurt. Gloves are friend. View Quote The hammock is a hot tip. I can see how it might not be useable at any time on a patrol, but it is a wonderful, lightweight, packable option that gets you off the nasty, muddy, buggy ground. If you have trees, you should have a little hammock. |
|
|
The problem with the GI-Issue VN-era nylon "jungle hammocks" was that the nylon weave of the "bed" of the hammock was very "tight" in order to deter insects from biting through the hammock bed and into the sleeping user. Fabric was so tight that it allowed water to "pool" inside the hammock.
Cresson Kearney's (book mentioned above) original jungle hammock was made out of water-repellent cotton and could allow some reasonable amount of "Breathing" of user's back. In order to do this, the bed of the hammock had a false bottom which prevented insects from attacking the user. This essential feature was deleted by Gov't bean-counters in later iterations of the GI hammock. Unsure if this feature is included in modern hammocks, but it should be, along with a fairly loose and breathable weave of nylon fabric for the bed. Sold-off the WW II item because it was getting so "fragile" that it was a "Collector's piece" by then: still in very useable condition. I've looked at the current offerings of hammock makers, and I'm not at all convinced that any of them ever read the "Jungle Hammock" comments in Kearney's book. Kearny invented the "modern" Jungle hammock. Required "Expertise" level qualification: I have owned and used original WW II GI hammocks, and VN-era hammocks |
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By raf: The problem with the GI-Issue VN-era nylon "jungle hammocks" was that the nylon weave of the "bed" of the hammock was very "tight" in order to deter insects from biting through the hammock bed and into the sleeping user. Fabric was so tight that it allowed water to "pool" inside the hammock. Cresson Kearney's (book mentioned above) original jungle hammock was made out of water-repellent cotton and could allow some reasonable amount of "Breathing" of user's back. In order to do this, the bed of the hammock had a false bottom which prevented insects from attacking the user. This essential feature was deleted by Gov't bean-counters in later iterations of the GI hammock. Unsure if this feature is included in modern hammocks, but it should be, along with a fairly loose and breathable weave of nylon fabric for the bed. Sold-off the WW II item because it was getting so "fragile" that it was a "Collector's piece" by then: still in very useable condition. I've looked at the current offerings of hammock makers, and I'm not at all convinced that any of them ever read the "Jungle Hammock" comments in Kearney's book. Kearny invented the "modern" Jungle hammock. Required "Expertise" level qualification: I have owned and used original WW II GI hammocks, and VN-era hammocks View Quote Look into the DIY backpacking hammock world. They are relatively easy to make and you can pick your own fabric. Pick one that doesn't have the waterproof coating. You can also do a double layer, with the bottom one slightly looser than the one you actually lay on, as an offset so that bugs can't bite through the sleeping layer. |
|
|
Coleman's surplus is running a 15% off discount code for the next couple days - FLASH15
They have the short-back British PLCE packs for $39, before the discount. And surplus british utility pouches for $10 before discount. |
|
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Look into the DIY backpacking hammock world. They are relatively easy to make and you can pick your own fabric. Pick one that doesn't have the waterproof coating. You can also do a double layer, with the bottom one slightly looser than the one you actually lay on, as an offset so that bugs can't bite through the sleeping layer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Originally Posted By raf: The problem with the GI-Issue VN-era nylon "jungle hammocks" was that the nylon weave of the "bed" of the hammock was very "tight" in order to deter insects from biting through the hammock bed and into the sleeping user. Fabric was so tight that it allowed water to "pool" inside the hammock. Cresson Kearney's (book mentioned above) original jungle hammock was made out of water-repellent cotton and could allow some reasonable amount of "Breathing" of user's back. In order to do this, the bed of the hammock had a false bottom which prevented insects from attacking the user. This essential feature was deleted by Gov't bean-counters in later iterations of the GI hammock. Unsure if this feature is included in modern hammocks, but it should be, along with a fairly loose and breathable weave of nylon fabric for the bed. Sold-off the WW II item because it was getting so "fragile" that it was a "Collector's piece" by then: still in very useable condition. I've looked at the current offerings of hammock makers, and I'm not at all convinced that any of them ever read the "Jungle Hammock" comments in Kearney's book. Kearny invented the "modern" Jungle hammock. Required "Expertise" level qualification: I have owned and used original WW II GI hammocks, and VN-era hammocks Look into the DIY backpacking hammock world. They are relatively easy to make and you can pick your own fabric. Pick one that doesn't have the waterproof coating. You can also do a double layer, with the bottom one slightly looser than the one you actually lay on, as an offset so that bugs can't bite through the sleeping layer. |
|
Promoted to Member by Ed, Sr.
|
Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Look into the DIY backpacking hammock world. They are relatively easy to make and you can pick your own fabric. Pick one that doesn't have the waterproof coating. You can also do a double layer, with the bottom one slightly looser than the one you actually lay on, as an offset so that bugs can't bite through the sleeping layer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By marnsdorff: Originally Posted By raf: The problem with the GI-Issue VN-era nylon "jungle hammocks" was that the nylon weave of the "bed" of the hammock was very "tight" in order to deter insects from biting through the hammock bed and into the sleeping user. Fabric was so tight that it allowed water to "pool" inside the hammock. Cresson Kearney's (book mentioned above) original jungle hammock was made out of water-repellent cotton and could allow some reasonable amount of "Breathing" of user's back. In order to do this, the bed of the hammock had a false bottom which prevented insects from attacking the user. This essential feature was deleted by Gov't bean-counters in later iterations of the GI hammock. Unsure if this feature is included in modern hammocks, but it should be, along with a fairly loose and breathable weave of nylon fabric for the bed. Sold-off the WW II item because it was getting so "fragile" that it was a "Collector's piece" by then: still in very useable condition. I've looked at the current offerings of hammock makers, and I'm not at all convinced that any of them ever read the "Jungle Hammock" comments in Kearney's book. Kearny invented the "modern" Jungle hammock. Required "Expertise" level qualification: I have owned and used original WW II GI hammocks, and VN-era hammocks Look into the DIY backpacking hammock world. They are relatively easy to make and you can pick your own fabric. Pick one that doesn't have the waterproof coating. You can also do a double layer, with the bottom one slightly looser than the one you actually lay on, as an offset so that bugs can't bite through the sleeping layer. I was also going to say that double layers are a fairly common feature these days, both for an insulating layer (air pocket slows the sweeping away of body heat), and biting insect protection. The con of course being extra weight and bulk. |
|
|
Originally Posted By trails-end: @lew How long does it last? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes I haven't kept track of the duration like I should have, but I haven't had to reapply, even on my high-use nylon gear- chest rigs and bush belt rig (setup like a lot of the kits in this thread- MOLLE pouches on an HSGI Sure Grip Belt). I put that on a couple years ago. My OD Green Bundeswehr cotton pack is still holding up, and I did that one about four years ago. That's canvas with a vinyl bottom- in other words: a sponge if untreated. Granted, I'm not using this stuff every day, and I have enough crap to cycle through a bunch of different setups, but it holds up well, and at least doesn't degrade in storage. Originally Posted By cap6888: Thanks for the info Lew. For adding a poncho liner, what about a “bum roll” pouch? Or for that matter, this might be a good way to incorporate a Molle Waist pack. If it just held a woobie, it might compress enough between a pack and the utility pouch shelf to be comfortable. Or since it isn’t really a lot of weight, maybe extend the belt and wrap it around the outer edge of the utility pouches. Although it would make your ass end bigger. Just thinking out loud here. Happy to help. As for the poncho roll, if I'm not carrying a pack, I clip the poncho roll to the suspender straps and the roll's side clips attach to bottle pouches mounted on the belt on which I have a paracord loop. So, yes, it does stick out a bit further, but I don't have a problem moving through dense bush. I could wear a pack on top of the roll, if required. |
|
"What is socialism? The most difficult and tortuous way to progress from capitalism to capitalism." -Stated at an intel conference, East Berlin, Oct. 1988
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -H.L. Mencken |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.