Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/20/2009 11:43:46 AM EDT
Not my, nor usual 1911, question.

I have the opportunity to purchase a Kimber Custom II, used with about 1500 rounds through it for $750...

Or I could wait 6-11 months for a new Springfield Loaded 1911 for $845 from a local store.

What would you do?
7/20/2009 11:45:14 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Not my, nor usual 1911, question.

I have the opportunity to purchase a Kimber Custom II, used with about 1500 rounds through it for $750...

Or I could wait 6-11 months for a new Springfield Loaded 1911 for $845 from a local store.

What would you do?



shoot myself
7/20/2009 11:58:05 AM EDT
[#2]
IMO both fine entry level 1911s. If the Kimber has an external extractor I would say no go. Other than that it's pretty much which one you like better. I've got two kimbers and they both run great. Used to have a Springer and it also ran great.

7/20/2009 12:06:49 PM EDT
[#3]
It seems from your question you'd rather have the Springfield. So Id get the Springfield if I were you.
7/20/2009 1:29:46 PM EDT
[#4]
1.  Price is high for a used Kimber Custom II.  Should cost about that new.
2.  Kimber has the Schwartz firing pin safety, which I don't think anyone considers to be desirable.  
3.  Tons of NIB Springfield Loadeds on Gunbroker.
7/20/2009 1:54:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
1.  Price is high for a used Kimber Custom II.  Should cost about that new.
2.  Kimber has the Schwartz firing pin safety, which I don't think anyone considers to be desirable.  
3.  Tons of NIB Springfield Loadeds on Gunbroker.


This
7/20/2009 2:08:26 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
1.  Price is high for a used Kimber Custom II.  Should cost about that new.
2.  Kimber has the Schwartz firing pin safety, which I don't think anyone considers to be desirable.  
3.  Tons of NIB Springfield Loadeds on Gunbroker.


This


No offense to either of you or to MrBackpack, but since he is referring to one of my guns I'd like to add (to my defense):

The Kimber has a NightHawk Custom steel MSH with fitted magwell, Bill Springfield tuned trigger, Chip MC magazine, Mike's Tactical holster and I lowered the price to $700.  You are right that a Custom II runs $750 new, but the extra stuff costs more than $250.

Mods if you don't like this post I will happily remove it, I just wanted to defend my posting in case anyone else saw it.
7/20/2009 2:17:26 PM EDT
[#7]
I own both, and Springfield is the better firearm.

7/20/2009 2:34:56 PM EDT
[#8]
buy an STI
7/20/2009 2:44:44 PM EDT
[#9]
Loaded in a heartbeat
7/20/2009 3:12:00 PM EDT
[#10]
It's a 'swartz' safety. Not a schwartz!
7/20/2009 4:20:43 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Not my, nor usual 1911, question.

I have the opportunity to purchase a Kimber Custom II, used with about 1500 rounds through it for $750...

Or I could wait 6-11 months for a new Springfield Loaded 1911 for $845 from a local store.

What would you do?


I have both so buy the Kimber and save like hell for the SA loaded.  A nice 1911 collection start my friend.

Kimber is MUCH lighter and easier on recoil IMO, ergo better accuracy.  YMMV
7/20/2009 4:59:34 PM EDT
[#12]
I would go with the Kimber. Artsohc is pretty knowledgeable about 1911's and he is a helpful guy so I wouldn't sweat buying the gun from him. I have had less than desirable observations of the Loaded model, so I can not recommend one. That being said, after buying the Kimber you can save up for a TRP or a Pro.
7/20/2009 5:13:08 PM EDT
[#13]
springfield hands down
7/20/2009 6:29:15 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
springfield hands down


/thread
7/20/2009 6:29:42 PM EDT
[#15]
Kimber hands down.  Especially with those mods/extras.
7/20/2009 7:21:21 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
springfield hands down


+1
7/21/2009 7:21:18 PM EDT
[#17]
Kimber!!!!!!!
7/22/2009 9:09:02 AM EDT
[#18]



Quoted:



Quoted:

springfield hands down




/thread






 
7/22/2009 7:34:21 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
springfield hands down


/thread


 


7/22/2009 9:21:55 PM EDT
[#20]
1. Colt > SA > STI > Kimber

2. SA > Colt > STI > Kimber

3. STI > SA > Colt > Kimber

4. Colt > STI > SA > Kimber

5. SA > STI > Colt > Kimber

6. STI > Colt > SA > Kimber


Take your pick

YMMV, but SA ranges anywhere from one to three rungs above Kimber.
7/22/2009 10:04:57 PM EDT
[#21]
Kimber.

I really dislike the "loaded" Springfields.  If you want a Springfield you are better off getting a Mil-spec or GI and fitting the parts you want, rather than paying extra for the "loaded" parts that you will want to swap out anyway.
7/22/2009 10:18:28 PM EDT
[#22]
Kimber sent their exec. over to SIG and he destroyed the QC of one of my favorite companies. -1
7/22/2009 11:27:16 PM EDT
[#23]
Colt my friend
7/23/2009 9:06:51 AM EDT
[#24]
kimber
7/25/2009 7:21:17 PM EDT
[#25]
Kimber
7/25/2009 7:36:33 PM EDT
[#26]
Tough choice, seeing who the owner is, but I'm quite the Springfield fan and can easily recommend them.
7/25/2009 9:27:49 PM EDT
[#27]
The used Kimber price is high.  However, none of my Kimber's has ever been a problem and they shoot amazingly!