Posted: 2/7/2008 7:26:36 PM EDT
Thanks for all the feedback guys... I always appreciate the time you all take to comment and reply.
I’ll keep that in mind... sort of like a “spare” kind of deal. |
Jason, I have noticed this trend of a tritium front sight but regular rear, but I don't follow? What is the idea behind that kind of setup? |
The idea behind a tritium front only is that it is less distracting and, for me at least, a more simple sight picture to acquire in a low-light environment. Instead of finding and possibly aligning two or three dots all one has to do is find a single tritium dot and, depending on distance and how the gun is zeroed, cover the target or place the tritium dot underneath the desired point of impact and press the trigger. Overall I like a tritium dot in the front only because it draws my eye to the front sight where it needs to be. A single dot in front is a fairly simple system to use but of course there can be downsides. Without a dot(s) in the rear one can loose the ability to adjust for windage... but that can be a balancing act in and of itself depending on time allowed for the shot and the distance to the target. |
|
That is one beautiful fighting gun Mr. Burton. The bad guy shot by that should be so honored. I set up my pistols' sights the same as well. On my MC Operator, I replaced the Novak tritium rear with a similar rear sight (a 10-8 rear). I found the 3 dot tritium to be so distracting, I was using up so much time lining them up. And shooting at night with the light attached defeats the whole purpose of night sights anyway as the glow is overwhelmed by the light. With this set up, you find the front sight and pull the trigger. Truly what you want in a fighting pistol. |














Do you accept monthly payments!