Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
4/24/2011 2:54:39 PM EDT
I was at the gun show this morning some shootin' irons.  I've never owned a 1911, but I've had a hankering for onesince I shot a rented Kimber TLE at the range a little while ago.  For around the same price, I can get a Kimber Pro Carry II, or a Sig 1911 Carry.  For a little less, I can get a Springfield Armory Champion Operator.  The Kimber doesn't come with night sights, and the Springfield is the only one with a rail.  Whatever I buy will likely be my CCW weapon, and if I get the Springfield, it may even take over as my HD weapon (since I like to have a light mounted to my HD weapon).



Opinions?



Thanks, all.
4/24/2011 3:08:17 PM EDT
[#1]
I handled Sig with light frame lightly used and new in box and the slide was loose on both pistols; I could shake the slide with the hammer down. I hope that Sig  Carry would be better
4/24/2011 3:12:24 PM EDT
[#2]
My vote goes for the Springfield Champion Operator....I like the Ambi safety and the night sights. I have a standard LW Champion and it is a great CCW pistol:



4/24/2011 3:57:17 PM EDT
[#3]
I'm not really concerned about the ambi safety, but it seemed like a well-put-together pistol.
4/24/2011 6:07:41 PM EDT
[#4]
Of the three, Springfield all the way.
4/25/2011 9:06:47 AM EDT
[#5]
i think the poll results sums it up.
4/25/2011 2:20:58 PM EDT
[#6]
I've actually always liked the Kimber Pro Carry, but for a novice you are better off with a Springfield.

That said, I'd be looking for a Colt Commander or a gov't length Springfield/Colt for my first 1911 that is going to be used hard.
4/26/2011 7:57:37 AM EDT
[#7]
Not that Kimber's are bad, because they totally aren't. But IMHO I feel you aren't getting what you pay for.  I think the Springer is a better value for the money.