Posted: 1/23/2011 4:15:40 PM EDT
|
I thought that 1911s were either 7+1 for standard frames and 6+1 for compact frames. Now I'm noticing that some brands like Colt and Kimber offer pistols in 8+1 and higher. Are these simply longer magazines that extend further beyond the bottoms of the frames or are these 1911s with longer grips (or what?)?
Thanks in advance |
|
Quoted:
original feed tubes were designed 6/7 + 1. the design was tweaked as posted above for 7/8+1. now Wilson has built an 8rd. mag that is purportedly an 8rd design rather than a 7rd design tweaked to 8. Tripp and metalform built true 8 rounders before Wilson as well. |
| The 1911 I just ordered comes with one 8 round mag. It's made by American Classic (Phillipine). Does that mean it should accept any 8 round mag made for 1911s? Any recommendations on a decent mag? (Doesn't have to be the BEST for competition. Just want something that's good and very reliable). |
|
Quoted:
Id wait and see how well the gun runs before you drop to much coin on mags. Good 8 round are 27 on up true. also remember, most welded-floorplate mags (7or 8) are flush and have a nice aesthetic lining up neatly with the frame, but that is exactly what you do NOT want for a carry mag. Reloads may not seat under stress and the main mag may not seat with a tap rack bang procedure. |
|
I have had great luck with Chip McCormick Shooting Star 8 rounders in my Kimber. Never had any problems and they are on sale at midway for $14.50 right now.
I use their 10 round power mags while target shooting and those are great. When I carry a spare mag it is what I bring along but it sticks out too far for me to reliably conceal. |
|
the mag question comes up pretty frequently and the answers always come back to the same manufacturers Wilson CMC Tripp Checkmate Metalform Colt factory i like to always refer to this archived thread http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=94016 |
